The Ben Evans column – first thoughts on 2008

Posted on

| Written by

Already 2008 is looking like being one of the most interesting F1 seasons for a long time, if only because if 2007 was a year of transition, then 2008 will be a year of consolidation (although there are a good number of top driver moves too).

This is just my hunch, but I think that 2008 will be all about Ferrari domination.

By the end of 2007 the Raikkonen-Ferrari package was the one on the pit-lane that was working the most effectively. Sure the McLarens were quicker, but Raikkonen and his Ferrari seemed as one, whereas Hamilton and Alonso were never 100% hooked up.

Furthermore Raikkonen drove a champion’s season, when he didn’t feel the car was 100% he didn’t give 100% (e.g. Monaco), but instead he let the car come to him throughout the season so that he went into the final few races knowing that he would come away from the weekend unable to physically have gone any quicker.

Unlike McLaren and Renault, Ferrari is retaining the same driver line up for 2008.

Felipe Massa is still something of an enigma. He’s by no means a straight number two (like, say, Giancarlo Fisichella), as on his day he very fast. But fast Massa only shows up on six or seven Sundays out of 17. In fact Massa makes something of a perfect spoiler, unlikely to be consistent enough to seriously challenge for the title, but plenty quick enough to ruin Hamilton’s day if Raikkonen is off song.

Arguably in 2007 McLaren were de-railed (on the track at least) because they had two drivers going for the title, whereas Ferrari had one championship contender and another rapid pedaller, who could be deployed as needed (as in Brazil).

McLaren go into 2008 with golden boy Lewis Hamiltonfirmly ensconced in the team. However I have a hunch that he will receive a much stiffer challenge from Heikki Kovalainen than many are anticipating. This is for a number of reasons.

Like it or loathe it, in 2007 Hamilton was the beneficiary of Alonso’s astounding ability to develop and set-up a race car. Hamilton’s downfall came on the days when he couldn’t rely on the McLaren to be glued to the circuit – the changeable conditions in Germany and China. On the days when the set-up wasn’t a dilemma Hamilton was unstoppable, but when he had to rely on feel he faltered.

On the other hand Heikki has feel in abundance, his natural car control is beyond question. Despite his year as a Renault test driver, he is maybe not as consistent in setting up a car so perfectly as Alonso. If Hamilton and Kovalainen do not set-up the McLaren to be bang on the money every time out (as happened in almost every race in 2007), then I think Heikki will come out on top as he is seemingly far happier to rely on feel and instinct than Hamilton.

Likewise I struggle to see McLaren being as dominant as they were in 2007. For all the negativity that Alonso fostered in McLaren, he came as close to winning the title as Hamilton did and did a huge amount to drive the car’s development. He may prove to be a bigger loss than Uncle Ron would care to acknowledge.

So Alonso returns to the fold at Renault, arguably his spiritual home. This move means that Renault’s now overflowing driver development scheme is likely to place up and coming drivers with QPR as a means of keeping them in Flavio’s clutches.

However the Renault Brazilian flair player Nelson Piquet Jnr has been promoted to the race team – largely on the basis that he is less likely to pressurise Alonso than Heikki Koivalinen was. I understand Taki Inoue is on standby to take the seat mid-season if Piquet proves too fast.

However I think this is unlikely given that Piquet has never been as quick as his publicists would have you believe. Sure he won the British Formula Three Championship, but given that his main rival (Adam Carroll) was running on a minuscule budget with no testing, this is perhaps as much a triumph of circumstance. Likewise in GP2 he flattered to deceive, always being there or thereabouts but never really a locked-in favourite. At least his surly demeanour will prove a fitting replacement for Ralf Schumacher.

So what of everybody’s favourite pantomime villain (if you’re English), or second coming (if you’re Spanish)? Well Renault is Alonso’s home team and as such it is easy to expect great things. However Renault had a bad year in 2007 and seemed far enough from the pace that even Alonso would have struggled to turn the car into regular podium fodder.

You also wonder if going into 2008, Alonso is racing to win, or to beat Lewis Hamilton. I predict sparks flying whenever they meet on-track.

As for the rest. BMW will hopefully build on 2007 and with and ego and superstar-free setup they could be the dark horses of the year. Both Kubica and Heidfeld know a lot about the ups and downs of F1 racing and are safe bets for keeping a level head.

Honda need a good year or could seriously face closure – after all what sensible organisation would pump hundreds of millions of dollars at an embarrassing and doomed enterprise?

Williams were one of the surprises of 2007, although the line-up is lacking in the development skills bought by Alex Wurz. For my money Nakajima is in the car a year too early, and Toyota could well spend much of the year underwriting substantial damage bills.

The Toyota works team seems all set to plough its unique furrow of mediocrity – how long before Timo Glock develops the going-for-ninth mentality that has stymied the team in recent seasons?

Red Bull are another enterprise which must surely start performing to justify the investment. Mark Webber and David Coulthard are both solid performers, but its hard to see the package picking up much beyond a few fifth places. Toro Rosso have one of the more tantalising line-ups. Sebastian Vettel has proved his F1 worthiness but risks being poached mid-season, whereas Sebastien Bourdais will be either a triumph or disaster. There is no doubt the Frenchman is supremely talented, but for one so accustomed to winning, fighting for 17th place may be too disheartening.

Super Aguri seem all set for another year in 2008 and by retaining Sato and Davidson they remain likely to keep embarrassing their parent team. Force India on the other hand have ‘back row’ written all over them. If the team can afford to hire two drivers (rather than accept open chequebooks), then there may be some meaningful development of the car (for the first time since 2002/3 in the old Jordan days), but points will only come should the rest fall off.

Photos: Daimler | Ferrari S.p.A.

More about the 2008 championship contenders

Author information

Ben Evans
Motorsport commentator Ben is RaceFans' resident bookworm. Look out for his verdict on the latest motor racing publications on Sundays....

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

12 comments on “The Ben Evans column – first thoughts on 2008”

  1. I assume this was written to provoke a reaction and is not intended to be serious.

  2. this was probably written before the Force India announced the drivers.

    haven’t heard anyone speculating on Honda’s closure before, I do not think there is that much danger of that happening soon. If they however start thinking about that, the first step might be pulling the plug on Super Aguri if the team continues to rely on mostly Honda cash only …

  3. Ben you are right on the Money about Alonso’s ability to set up a car. It will be very interesting to see if he can lift Renault in a similar way he effected McLaren.

    Steven why would Ben not be serious?

  4. About Piquet’s speed, there’s something I need to ask… Was Piquet’s car faster or slower than Hamilton’s on the 2006 GP2 Series?

    I didn’t follow that season that close to know it for sure, but I felt that Lewis had the best car and, if he did have it in fact, Nelsinho’s campaign – 102 points against 114 – was highly respectable, considering what Lewis has become, so he can indeed be as fast as his father wants him to be…

  5. GP2 is a spec formula. All the cars are identical.

    The reason I don’t believe this is serious is it is entirely pro-Ferrari and dismissive of McLaren. The assumption that Lewis Hamilton was somehow riding on Alonso’s coat-tails is utterly unproven. Those of us who watched F3000 remember him going in to a team with the championship favourite in what was supposed to be a learning year followed by a serious attempt at the championship the following year. It didn’t quite work that way as Lewis blew away his team mate to the extent that most people have forgotten him already.

    The idea that Lewis Hamilton lacks feel is laughable. I am sure when he overtook Raikkonen at the first chicane at Monza the first thought everyone had was that he lacked feel. Like all the greats he seems to know where the grip is before he gets there. Rookie mistakes whould not be considered as a serious assessment of ability. To use the Nurburgring race to assess his ability in the wet is ludicrous as this was the first time he had driven an F1 car in the wet. As for China his tyres were shot and the team should have pitted him.

    It should be remembered that in his early car career where he did two seasons in a formula his second season was always massively better than his first. Raikkonen is going to improve a little over a year. Hamilton could improve a whole lot.

  6. Paul Sainsbury
    14th January 2008, 22:32

    I must say I think Steven is spot on here. It seems to me that Hamilton probably has the most raw feel and car control since Gilles.

  7. Keke Rosberg ran Lewis in karts as team mate to Nico. Anyone who has listened to Rosberg knows he thought Gilles Villeneuve was the ultimate racer. In the 25 years since Gilles died I have never heard Keke compare anyone to him until I read an article last year where he compared Lewis to him.

  8. Still, Nelsinho was the only match for the so-called wonderboy, genius, all-time great Lewis Hamilton, and with the same car… so, he deserves some credit, not only for his surname, and many people are forgetting this…

  9. Just one little problem, Steven. If Lewis improves a whole lot, the car should also improve for us to see Lewis’ improvement. If McLaren’s car isn’t as good, the improvement will be somewhat stifled, to say the least. Those early years were in pretty much single-spec formulae. Over here, the cars change every year (as do the rules), so it will be a LOT harder to make a marked improvement.

  10. i read u asking what manufacturer would pump in millions of dollars into a doomed operation?
    for a good answer, ask Toyota!
    if red bull have a yr like BMW did last yr (remember it’s thier 2nd yr with A.Newey) they’ll b happy!
    also, if honda dont improve under R.Brawn i’ll b supried!
    remember Ferrari b4 he went there?

  11. Hamilton’s German race cant be used to describe his driving because his race was compromised twice already. So trying to catch up with the leading pack and hitting standing water cannot be considered, as a lack of driving ability. China however is a different matter.

  12. Nathan, I wouldn’t expect Honda to make leaps just yet just with Ross Brawn – remember how long it took even with all the key members of the dream team (although it is relatively short compared to the period of nothingness Ferrari experienced). However, it would be, or at least should be, hard to repeat their failure of 2007 – the only way can only be up.

    I find the Alonso vs Hamilton dynamic interesting for 2008 – although I’m not sure about the sparks, as it seems rare to see in modern F1 now,but given they’re in different teams, who knows. I’m sure Alonso would rather be concentrating on his own agenda, but there probably won’t be that many situations to see these two at it unless the Renault’s back up to speed and the fight.

Comments are closed.