Australian GP practice two analysis

Posted on

| Written by

McLaren are happy with the MP4-25's pace around Melbourne

McLaren ended the first day of practice in Australia in a positive mood, talking up their chances after a strong showing in both sessions.

But Ferrari and Red Bull still look like the teams to beat ahead of qualifying tomorrow.

We’ve had five practice sessions so far in 2010 and a different team has been fastest in each of them. That shows two things: the field is quite closely matched at the front, and judging form based on practice times isn’t easy.

The second practice session was disrupted by two bursts of rainfall: one at the beginning of the session, the other around half an hour in. You can see the effect it had on the drivers most clearly in the chart of the front runners’ lap times below.

McLaren, Red Bull, Ferrari and Mercedes

FP2 times: McLaren, Mercedes, Red Bull, Ferrari

Ferrari ran a new front wing on Fernando Alonso’s car while Felipe Massa used the regular front wing so they could compare the two. The team said the new front wing gave positive results and Massa said he was happy with tyre degradation.

McLaren had some aerodynamic changes on their car including new wing mirrors mounted on the side pod wings. The general feeling at the team is that they’re closer to the pace than they were at Bahrain, particularly on one-lap qualifying pace.

Lewis Hamilton, who was quickest in the second session, was one of several drivers to complain about slower cars getting in the way:

Every time I’ve tried to put a good lap in on a new set of tyres, I’ve hit traffic.
Lewis Hamilton

Hamilton’s quickest lap (the lowest of the orange squares on the left-hand side of the chart) was on soft tyres. When Jenson Button came out to do his time on soft tyres the track was wet, making it hard to compare their efforts.

It was interesting to see Red Bull and Ferrari doing stints alongside each other towards the end of the first period of dry running in FP2. Red Bull were ahead on pace which was probably mostly down to fuel load. But when one considers that the Ferrari is believed to start the race heavier than the Red Bull because of its thirstier engine, that in itself could be significant.

At Mercedes, Michael Schumacher was one of few drivers to improve his time at the end of the session, having failed to set a lap during the first opportunity when the track was dry. He ended up ahead of Nico Rosberg for the first time in a session this year.

Renault, Force India, Sauber, Williams and Toro Rosso

FP2 times: Renault, Force India, Williams, Sauber, Toro Rosso

Williams published a detailed breakdown of their cars’ activities in FP2 as follows:

Rubens Barrichello: Run 1: New Prime (12 laps, tyre evaluations), Run 2: New Option (13 laps, tyre evaluations)
Nico Hulkenberg: Run 1: New Option (11 laps, tyre evaluations), Run 2: New Intermediate (3 laps, wet tyre test), Run 3: New Prime (11 laps, tyre evaluations)

The pair were out at roughly the same time for their new tyre evaluations. Barrichello ended his run on the hard (Prime) tyre with two laps in the 1’26.9s, while Hulkenberg’s last two laps on the soft tyres were 1’27.8 and 1’27.5.

This suggests the hard tyre is quick and, assuming we can take its durability for granted, it will surely be a preferable choice for Sunday.

Hulkenberg was driving at Albert Park for the first time and gave the track the thumbs-up:

Albert Park is quite a cool track; I really enjoyed it out there. It’s very bumpy, but definitely good fun.
Nico Hulkenberg

But at Force India Vitantonio Liuzzi was another driver frustrated by traffic:

Unfortunately there was always traffic as there was people slowing down and backing off to try and get some space, so I didn’t get a free lap. It was like people were on a Sunday drive in some places.
Vitantonio Liuzzi

However Force India appeared to be closer to the pace of the Renaults in the second session. Not that the French team were off their pace from this morning – in fact Vitaly Petrov’s best time in the second session was quicker than Robert Kubica’s fastest lap from first practice.

Jaime Alguersuari was critical of the new section of track at Bahrain two weeks ago but was much more positive about Albert Park, calling it an “amazing track”.

He enjoyed it so much he did 43 laps – 14 more than anyone else – mostly in one long stint beginning in the middle of the session while the track was still damp. This was clearly a high-fuel run, as he ended up the best part of four seconds off team mate Sebastien Buemi’s pace.

Virgin, Lotus and HRT

FP2 times: Lotus, Virgin, HRT

The award for most optimistic post-practice press release goes to HRT:

Bruno’s car has now covered its first race distance if the team takes into account all of the running from the Bahrain weekend.

However Bruno Senna covered no ground in the second practice session following fuel pressure problems and team mate Karun Chandhok stopped just 100 metres out of the pits with a gearbox problem. The uphill struggle continues.

Virgin did little running too, with just two installation laps for Lucas di Grassi.

Top 50 lap times

RankDriverLap timeLap

Lewis Hamilton85.8016

Jenson Button86.0765

Mark Webber86.24821

Mark Webber86.34319

Jenson Button86.34912

Michael Schumacher86.51116

Michael Schumacher86.52211

Michael Schumacher86.54813

Lewis Hamilton86.6484

Jenson Button86.6848

Vitaly Petrov86.7326

Jenson Button86.7354

Lewis Hamilton86.81912

Sebastien Buemi86.8327

Adrian Sutil86.83422

Vitantonio Liuzzi86.8358

Jenson Button86.87415

Rubens Barrichello86.90411

Adrian Sutil86.947

Rubens Barrichello86.95112

Nico Rosberg86.9564

Nico Rosberg86.95720

Nico Rosberg86.99421

Sebastien Buemi87.0055

Vitaly Petrov87.0785

Pedro de la Rosa87.10811

Robert Kubica87.1086

Sebastien Buemi87.1528

Lewis Hamilton87.21710

Jenson Button87.21711

Michael Schumacher87.29810

Rubens Barrichello87.4318

Kamui Kobyashi87.4558

Nico Rosberg87.4643

Sebastien Buemi87.4984

Vitantonio Liuzzi87.51212

Nico Hulkenberg87.54511

Rubens Barrichello87.5855

Vitantonio Liuzzi87.58717

Adrian Sutil87.6278

Vitantonio Liuzzi87.6346

Nico Rosberg87.70918

Kamui Kobyashi87.7459

Robert Kubica87.7464

Rubens Barrichello87.7767

Pedro de la Rosa87.78423

Kamui Kobyashi87.8117

Nico Hulkenberg87.8825

Nico Hulkenberg87.89910

Lewis Hamilton87.9373

2010 Australian Grand Prix

    Author information

    Keith Collantine
    Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

    Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

    30 comments on “Australian GP practice two analysis”

    1. Bored of hearing drivers moan about traffic already, having traffic on quali runs or in practice and in the race is part and parcel of motor racing, especially now ther are more cars in the field. The drivers moaning need to just accept it’ll happen, be frustrated, but just get on with it.

      1. Sorry, ignore the first comment, made a typo :P

        1. Getting ill is part and parcel of life, but I’m sure you will moan when you get cancer, won’t you?

          So stop moaning about drivers giving their opinion about stuff.

          1. Indeed. They are not even moaning, they simply respond to questions how their qualifying went.

            1. Indeed. If you read what hamilton says, it’s just a statement of the truth.

              Liuzzi’s tone seems a little more moan like, but so what. We need opinions!

    2. Keith,
      I assume where the axis read Session time (s) you probably mean Session time (M)? Minutes into the session?

      1. No, seconds – the session doesn’t last 5,000 minutes!

      2. Not sure if its possible, but maybe you might want to truncate the time axis for those empty parts to further differentiate the squares, circles and colours in the charts.

    3. I pity the new teams. How are they going to bag any sponsor in the current situation? They will fall by the wayside during the season and destroy their own future. The next season really needs some reputed teams like Lola and Epsilon Euskadi.

      1. Because if that XTrac gearbox and hydraulics were in an Epsilon Euskadi car or Lola car then it would have worked?

        How does that make sense?

        1. Perhaps not. But I bet they have more experience with big-time racing than this current bunch.

    4. This suggests the hard tyre is quick and, assuming we can take its durability for granted, it will surely be a preferable choice for Sunday.

      Quick enough for some of the top ten to qualify with? Or is it still too early to say.

    5. Hey, I can’t find the place to bet my predictions for this GP… Anyone has it?

      1. I did mention it in the round-up when it opened days ago.

        1. Keith, it seems a lot of people (me included) read only the full articles and not the round-ups. It happened to me, too. That might be the reason for quite a number of posters asking about this. I´d suggest putting up a special link in the home page (like the one for the “Race info”), it´d make things easier. Give it a thought.

    6. Did Vettell not go out in this practice session?

      1. no, he’s there. round blue circles in the top graph. not on his bahrain pace though.

    7. If I were McLaren, apparently confident about their race pace and more confident about their qualifying pace than Bahrain’s, I would think about doing Q3 on the hards. Then they can switch to the softs nearer the end of the race, when the track is more rubbered in. Albert Park is quite severe on graining the softer compounds, so this could be a good option.

      Of course, if there is an early safety car (likely at Albert Park), then it would ruin the whole thing, so maybe not!

      1. Yeah I’d agree with the second bit. A safety car is almost inevitable, I’d say starting on hards would be a bad choice.

        If the safety car arrives in the first dozen or so laps you could switch onto the hards and gamble about reaching the end on them. Not so sure about trying the same on the soft.

      2. I think qualifying on soft tyres is a foregone conclusion there’s no way they want to give away track position, we know how difficult overtaking is.

        1. No, we don’t really know how difficult overtaking is. We only really have Schumacher and Webber’s word for it. Further down the field there was plenty of overtaking and Alonso didn’t feel it would be impossible to try an attack on Vettel.

          Besides, last race they were about 4 or 5 seconds a lap slower at the end of the race than in qualifying.

          Some fresh soft rubber on a rubbered in track and the overtaking skills of Hamilton and Button could see them get past some cars.

          Though I agree with Icthyes, that the chance of a safety car is just too great.

          1. Hamilton was over a second a lap quicker than Rosberg in the first stint at Bahrain, and was much quicker than his in a straight line, yet Rosberg never even had to move to defend his line once. And Hamilton is hardly the sort of person to sit there and not try an overtaking move.

      3. Hamilton celebrates by getting his car impounded a few hours after 2nd practice doing ‘burnouts’ and ‘fishtails’!

        At least he’s doing his best to liven up the F1’s image! Think it augurs well…

        1. That’s all F1 needs…boy racer antics! LOL

    8. I think Red Bull have it in the bag, Mark Webber did his best lap time on a drying track not before it, and also did his lap on worn hard tyres with fuel…
      Mclaren went quick but had softs and low fuel….’Button hints at light McLaren fuel load’

      1. I noticed the same thing, a Red Bull will take pole and I hope it’s Webber for his home GP.

    9. I love the guff from HRT. Hope there is more like that to come over the year.

    10. Virgin Racing and HRT look like a Groucho Marx version of “Grand Prix”… they even make Osella look like Mclaren in perspective.

      … That aside the weekend “feels” good, as the drivers, teams and Fans are relatively sure we’ll have a better race than the one in Bahrain.

      Lets pray for that!

    11. Nice analysis, as always. Just there is no mention of Sauber..?

    Comments are closed.