Red Bull bounce back to claim title hat-trick

2012 F1 season review

Posted on

| Written by

Red Bull started 2012 on the back foot after triple-whammy of rules changes over the winter.

Their attempts to regain lost ground brought them into conflict with the FIA more than once during the season. But it paid off handsomely as the team clinched their third constructors’ championship on the trot and Sebastian Vettel retained the drivers’ title.

The FIA’s new exhaust restrictions was intended to reduce the ‘exhaust-blowing’ which Red Bull had used since 2010. At first they planned to recover some of the loss using bodywork behind the car’s rear axle, but a further rules clarification from the FIA shortly before the season began sent Adrian Newey back to his drawing board.

Newey said the situation was reminiscent of 1994, when the banning of several electronic devices he had used to optimise the car’s aerodynamics to a level beyond that of his rivals forced a change in design direction.

On top of those two developments was a third clamping down on the use of flexing front wings, which Red Bull also exploited very effectively in 2011. As a result they began the season behind McLaren, Mercedes and often Lotus on raw pace.

Red Bull team stats 2012

Best race result (number)1 (7)
Best grid position (number) 1 (8)
Non-finishes (mechanical/other) 3 (2/1)
Laps completed (% of total) 2,293 (96.18%)
Laps led (% of total) 434 (36.41%)
Championship position (2011)1 (1)
Championship points (2011)460 (650)
Pit stop performance ranking1

Mark Webber got on better with the car initially and often out-qualified Vettel in the first part of the year. He inherited pole position in Monaco and held on to win, and added a second victory at Silverstone after passing Fernando Alonso.

Meanwhile Vettel eagerly explored alternative exhaust solutions in an effort to find something he was happier with. Switching to the original configuration in China proved a dead-end, but he had a successful weekend in Bahrain with a simpler version of the bodywork.

Whereas last year the team were competitive everywhere they went – even power tracks like Monza – in 2012 there was more variation in their performance, and the effect was amplified by how close the field around them was.

In Valencia the combination of a track the car liked and another improvement to their exhaust saw Vettel produce a Q3 performance reminiscent of 2011. He took pole position and was running away with the race when he was struck down by another of the RB8’s weaknesses: unreliability.

Alternator failure claimed him there and at Monza, and his team mate too in the penultimate round. By this time other Renault teams had switched to a different design of alternator and Red Bull belatedly followed in time for the final race.

Webber also suffered with unreliability. Brake and hydraulic problems in Valencia meant he went out in Q1, though he recovered well to take fourth.

He had a five-place penalty for a gearbox change in Germany due to what Newey called “a really stupid operational failure”. Webber dragged his car home eighth after differential failure in Hungary, but the knock-on effect of that was another gearbox change penalty in Belgium.

While Red Bull’s car failures did not cost them as much as McLaren’s, without them both championships would have been secured earlier. But in other respects the solidity of the RB8 impressed – particularly how Vettel was able to complete a race distance in Brazil after two impacts on the first lap.

The team were more reliable in the pits than their car was on the track. Red Bull’s pit stops were as quick as McLaren’s and as consistent as Ferrari’s. They were usually complemented by effective strategies. Canada was an exception, but even there they limited the damage of the initial mistake by making a late pit stop. That gave Vettel another four points in his battle with Alonso which proved valuable at the end of the year.

At the mid-point of the season Red Bull’s one-lap pace was no better than Ferrari’s, who out-qualified them in Belgium and Italy. Vettel overcame the car’s straight-line speed shortcoming to climb from an early 12th to second in Belgium in one of his best drives of the year.

Their pursuit of performance provoked several responses from the FIA. Red Bull were instructed to change the configuration of their floor after the Monaco Grand Prix, alter their exhaust maps after the German Grand Prix and change their brake ducts at the Canadian Grand Prix.

Newey was unimpressed with the “sniping” his team endured, referring to another complaint rivals made about their car: “There has never been a manual ride-height mechanism, and certainly the car has never been changed between qualifying and race. In the end, all they needed was a bit of lockwire.

“There was nothing Machiavellian, It was all a bit of a non-story but, as usual, these things get blown out of proportion.”

Did Red Bull break the rules? The fact that they were never excluded from a race speaks for itself. The stewards’ response to Red Bull’s defence over how their engine torque maps were being used captures the argument perfectly:

“While the stewards do not accept all the arguments of the team, they however conclude that as the regulation is written, the map presented does not break the text of… the Formula One Technical Regulations and therefore [we] decide to take no further action.”

As Newey has often pointed out, there is no such thing as the spirit of the rules. This team was stung by a technical rules interpretation regarding Double Diffusers in 2009 which they did not agree with. Arguably it cost the both championships that year, and clearly they do not intend to be caught out again.

Over the final seven races Red Bull and McLaren pulled away from their competitors. The RB8s were further enhanced by the addition of a Double DRS rear wing at the Japanese Grand Prix, which gave them a useful boost in qualifying.

This was Vettel’s opportunity and he seized it magnificently with consecutive wins in Singapore, Japan, Korea and India. It propelled him into the lead of the drivers’ championship and left the team virtually unbeatable in the constructors’.

However a crucial error in Abu Dhabi meant the drivers’ championship went down to the wire. Vettel had to start from the back of the grid at Yas Marina after running out of fuel.

The team took the opportunity to start his car from the pits so they could change his set-up to improve the car’s straight-line speed and make overtaking easier. With a little luck and some excellent passes Vettel saved the day with a great third place.

Webber remained in the championship hunt until late in the year. And even at the final round he was initially reluctant to give quarter to his team mate, squeezing him out at the start and taking full advantage of Vettel’s need to exert caution. There was an audible note of relief on the team radio when he let Vettel by later in the race.

It must be galling for Webber to see his junior team mate rack up three championships on the trot, particularly after how close he came to winning in 2010. But he enjoyed a considerably more competitive 2012 and each of his two victories were more satisfying than his sole inherited win last year.

Vettel’s third world championship emphasised his claim to be one of the sport’s greats. Although he let points slip through his fingers in races like Malaysia and Germany, he scored more wins in a competitive season than any other driver, and produced excellent damage-limiting performances in Australia, Belgium and Abu Dhabi when he was disadvantaged.

But his finest hour came in Brazil. He was pointing backwards within seconds of the start, told the team couldn’t fix his car and had a slow pit stop due to a faulty radio. Yet in treacherous conditions and with the world championship hanging in the balance he patiently climbed into the points and took the result he needed for a fully deserved third championship victory.

As F1 becomes increasingly fixated on “improving the show” it sometimes gets overlooked that it is essentially a contest to see who can build the best car and drive it the quickest. Red Bull did this better than any other team this year.

Red Bull drivers’ 2012 race results

Sebastian Vettel211516443542221111326
Mark Webber444411174188620119234

Red Bull drivers’ 2012 laps per position

Sebastian Vettel36813813817880794620291219176133254121100
Mark Webber66152501477710113088824665351619117193541700

Over to you

What did you think of Red Bull’s third consecutive constructors’ championship win – and Vettel’s hat-trick in the drivers’ championship? Have your say in the comments.

2012 F1 season

Browse all 2012 F1 season articles

Images © Red Bull/Getty images

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

14 comments on “Red Bull bounce back to claim title hat-trick”

  1. Red Bull are clearly the best team in the past 3 years. Although Seb and Mark had difficult first half of the season, they achieved significant advantage for the Constructors title in the mid season. At that point i thought it will be difficult for Vettel to win another drivers title, but i was pretty sure about Red Bull sealing the constructors.

  2. By the end of Barcelona I thought they had a distant chance for WCC and no WDC. How wrong my predictions turned out to be

  3. I must admit that I thought that neither Red Bull nor Vettel will win any of the championships, and specially after Monza. They certanly rally from that point, and took the right steps to made a great comeback.

    1. I know I went for Vettel in some mid-season poll, cant remember when that was though.

    2. That’s a bit naive.
      People who can put consistent challenge together should never be discounted.
      I learned that way back in Schumi’s first years in Ferrari. Some drivers will inevitably always somehow challenge. Unless there’s a car difference as big as Williams 1992, Williams 1996, Renault and McLaren 2005 (compared to Ferrari), Brawn 2009 or Red Bull 2011.

      Despite the top car’s performance swinging around between teams in the last 20 years, there have been less then 10 drivers who were in the serious running for WDC multiple times through out their careers.

      Schumacher, Kimi, Alonso, Hamilton, Vettel and perhaps Hill and Hakkinen.
      Especially Schumacer and Alonso standing out for being in the sport for some time and yet, being in it almost every year.

      I remember, from the word GO in Australia, as an Alonso fan, I only watched out for Hamilton and Vettel. I didn’t get fazed one bit when either Button or Webber won, beyond being displeased by the fact that they took points off Alonso by finishing in front of him when Alonso was already ahead of Lewis and Seb.

  4. That update in Singapore and Japan proved absolutely crucial in retaining the titles: had Ferrrai made similar gains at least the driver’s title would’ve been out of their grasp I’m sure.

    1. I’m still puzzled how Ferrari managed to stagnate that badly for almost whole 2nd half of the season.
      I can always say it would have been different were it not for Grosjean, but the one other thing that is as obvious as that one, is that Ferrari failed miserably with developing their car in the second part of the season and that’s what really annoys me.
      I remember Alonso predicting that they should be really strong in Singapore, in Korea and on few more tracks, but he was probably completely disappointed that they were barely making the 3rd row, with Massa being out in Q2 on most occasions.

      1. @brace – I’ve thought always that maybe Ferrari hit a “development wall” with the F2012. There is no denying it was a vastly improved machine after the Mugello test but perhaps that came back to bite them late on in the season and just maybe they couldn’t develop it sufficiently in the course of a tightly-packed, restricted season to overcome it’s qualifying shortfalls – believed to have been caused by it’s DRS by Gary Anderson.

        Whether or not that is the case will likely never be known but I highly doubt that they couldn’t develop merely due to a wind tunnel problem, there’s definitely other factors.

  5. All was lost till Lauda said Alonso would be WDC. I have never seen correct prediction from Lauda. I felt the game was open for anyone from that point, including RBR and Vettel.

    1. LOL, interesting, I always remember that moment… and I actually agreed with him…

  6. OmarR-Pepper (@)
    20th December 2012, 22:22

    I agree with what Newey said on the video, about “the spirit of the rules”. Of course you can interprete the rules, go near the border, not beyond. Drivers also understand that. I recall now how sometimes drivers are penalized in a strange way because of this or that “spirit of the rules”, blah blah F1 lets the best TEAM win.
    Also, it bothers me when people claim this year was “Newey vs Alonso”, I wonder if Alonso is the new Jack Brabham who races the car he has built BY HIMSELF. All is a team. Hamilton ran with a team which let him down many times this year, ergo he couldn’t battle neither for some races nor for the championship. All drivers need the team and viceversa.

    1. You spoke my thoughts. Indeed, i was impressed by the response from Vettel when they asked the same “Newey Vs Alonso” question by press. He was cool to reply that there are more people in the team who makes the car development and not only Newey. Yes, that is correct. The RedBull is not the team only with Newey and Vettel.

  7. The red bull team is the next champions team for ten years.

Comments are closed.