Sauber have been fined �16,980 (?����?�20,000) for giving an incorrect radio message to Nico Hulkenberg which resulted in him holding up Max Chilton.
Hulkenberg was not penalised for the incident which happened at the end of final practice.
The stewards ruled that “the team of car 11 [Sauber] advised him [Hulkenberg] by radio that car 23 [Chilton] was on a ‘cool down’ lap. Car 11 was preparing for a fast lap when the driver realised car 23 was immediately behind him and tried his best to give car 23 the apex.”
“The team of car 23 [Marussia] does not believe the incident amounted to illegitimately impeding,” they added.
“However, whilst the driver of car 11 is not found to be in breach of Article 16.1(g), we determine the team to be responsible for the incident, which was potentially dangerous, by issuing an incorrect message.”
At the end of practice Hulkenberg was heard asking “What was that about, Chilton?” to which race engineer Marco Schupbach replied “Yeah we speak after”.
The stewards also gave Nico Rosberg his second reprimand of the year for driving too slowly on the track during final practice on the approach to 130R.
“Car 9 [Rosberg] slowed to less than 90kph when car 20 [Charles Pic] was closing at full speed on the straight,” said the stewards.
“The speed differential was approximately 200kph at the point where car 20 needed to decide on which side to pass. The driver of car 9 conceded that he should have more clearly indicated to car 20 on which side he could pass, by moving to one side.”
Adrian Sutil has also received a five-place grid penalty for a gearbox change after his original unit was damaged when he crashed at Spoon Curve during the final hour of practice.
2013 Japanese Grand Prix
- Grosjean voted Driver of the Weekend for first time
- Webber still has doubts over Japanese GP strategy
- Japanese Grand Prix gets average rating for 2013
- 2013 Japanese Grand Prix team radio transcript
- 2013 Japanese Grand Prix fans’ video gallery
Image © Sauber =
Armchair Expert (@armchairexpert)
12th October 2013, 9:24
Is FIA desperately looking for money or what, because I really don’t understand this huge financial penalty for such minor infringement?
Force Maikel (@force-maikel)
12th October 2013, 9:28
Now you mention it Red Bull/Vettel were only fined 200 € for speeding in the pitlane at Singaprore. Then again misinforming a driver over aproaching cars is a more serious thing.
Red Andy (@red-andy)
12th October 2013, 10:35
@force-maikel I’m not sure if it’s still the case now, but in the past the size of a pit lane speeding fine depended on how many km/h you were over the speed limit. If Vettel was only slightly over the limit, that would account for the small size of the fine.
Force Maikel (@force-maikel)
12th October 2013, 10:41
@red-andy That’s what I used to think but this article states it was calculated on the basis of his salary at Red Bull
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/formulaone/article-2426671/Sebastian-Vettel-fined-170-speeding-Singapore-pit-lane.html
Patrickl (@patrickl)
12th October 2013, 13:58
That’s just the article putting into a “funny” perspective
KeeleyObsessed (@keeleyobsessed)
12th October 2013, 15:55
@force-maikel
It doesn’t, it’s just putting the fine into context. The use of the word ‘effectively’ is what gives it away to me. My guess is he was only 1-2 kph over the speed limit and was fined accordingly
Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine)
12th October 2013, 19:48
@force-maikel @patrickl @keeleyobsessed At any right the article is incorrect because pit lane speeding fines are now paid by the teams, not the drivers.
BasCB (@bascb)
12th October 2013, 14:36
YEah, I was convinced that was the way these penalties were calculated too @red-andy
Fer no.65 (@fer-no65)
12th October 2013, 14:31
@force-maike speeding in the pitliane is like “legislated”. It’s a certain amount of money per km/h that exceeds the limit.
Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys)
12th October 2013, 9:31
Uh, it’s because they told Hulkenberg the wrong thing. Because of that, Chilton and Hulkenberg could have easily collided, and given the difference in speed between the two, it would have been a big one.
Furthermore, Marussia accepted that Sauber made a mistake and that there was nothing malicious in Hulkenberg blocking Chilton. So the stewards would have been kinder on Sauber, but still had to penalise them. So instead of a reprimand or grid penalty or what-have-you, they chose a fine.
Lewisham Milton
12th October 2013, 10:21
Ker-ching! Between them, Williams and Sauber have paid for the FIA Christmas party
(or a load of election ********)
Force Maikel (@force-maikel)
12th October 2013, 9:25
Ouch…
iAltair (@)
12th October 2013, 10:26
I lol-ed just by reading the title.
Magnificent Geoffrey (@magnificent-geoffrey)
12th October 2013, 11:44
I like how detailed the stewards’ explanation is. Makes a lot of sense to me. Wish all decisions were so well explained.
F1Rocket
12th October 2013, 14:12
Hmmm.. 3 Germans got penalty/reprimand. There is one German left :D
SlackBladder
13th October 2013, 6:00
Come on when did stuff just happening stop and all these fines and laws start? Racing used to be a free for all, a huge party, F-U-N. Since the Self impotant, Egotestical, Idiots who think this crap up think what they say matters, in the name of Safety, Security and the Nanny state. What next speed limits on ‘race tracks’? with F1 cars painted to look like cop cars zooming up to pull car and driver over for disobeying the speed limit!?
I was going to say if this keeps up F1 will be unwatchable in a few years to any one with discerning tastes, however I think we are at that point now with this ‘sport’, Nascar any one?