The FIA has overhauled its new F1 superlicence points structure which will now give credit to drivers who compete in touring cars, karting and other single-seater championships.
The World Touring Car Championship, Germany’s DTM, the American Indy Lights series and the CIK-FIA karting world championships will now all contribute towards the 40 points drivers must accumulate over three years in order to be allowed to compete in Formula One.
The weightings of the other championships have also been revised. No championship will award more than 40 points, however the highest-ranked series will give that maximum the more than one driver.
Formula Renault 3.5 now awards more points than GP3, though still less than the FIA’s Formula Three championship. Japanese Super Formula, which features some of the fastest cars outside of F1, has always been given more points, yet is still rated lower than GP3.
Junior Formula Renault championships have also increased in importance, with the champion now receiving ten points instead of five.
The FIA has also confirmed the Formula E champion will be eligible for an F1 superlicence, although the series is not included in the points system. It will also allow drivers who earn enough superlicence points to qualify for F1 but do to immediately gain a drive to retain them for up to three years.
Revised 2016 FIA F1 Superlicence points structure
Championship | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Future FIA F2 championship | 40 | 40 | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 201 |
GP2 | 40 | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 163 |
FIA F3 European championship | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 124 |
World Endurance Championship (LMP1 only) | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 124 |
IndyCar | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 124 |
Formula Renault 3.5 | 35 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 123 |
GP3 | 30 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 93 |
Japanese Super Formula | 25 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 88 |
FIA WTCC | 15 | 12 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 55 |
DTM | 15 | 12 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 55 |
Indy Lights | 15 | 12 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 55 |
National FIA Formula Four championships | 12 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
National Formula Three championships | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
Formula Renault 2.0 (EuroCup, ALPS or NEC) | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
CIK-FIA World Championships (Senior) | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Original 2016 FIA F1 Superlicence points structure
Series | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Future FIA F2 championship | 60 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
GP2 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
FIA F3 European Championship | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
FIA World Endurance Championship (LMP1 only) | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
IndyCar | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
GP3 | 30 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Formula Renault 3.5 | 30 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Japanese Super Formula | 20 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
FIA-certified national Formula Four championships | 10 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
National Formula Three championships | 10 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Formula Renault EuroCup, ALPS or NEC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2016 F1 season
- Which was F1’s best down-to-the-wire title fight?
- Are tickets too dear? Crowds fell at some tracks in 2016
- F1’s TV audience decline stopped in 2016
- Brawn among key F1 hires announced by Liberty
- Has F1 hit ‘peak penalties’? Fewer sanctions in 2016
Carlitox (@carlitox)
10th July 2015, 23:59
Formula 3 is still overrated in my opinion. Even more so, given the last few incident-prone races. Good to see they are taking FR3.5 and touring cars into account, though.
SatchelCharge (@satchelcharge)
11th July 2015, 2:46
Agree
wsrgo (@wsrgo)
15th July 2015, 15:34
@carlitox A series can’t be overrated. The drivers in it can. And the reason for that is F3 has huge grid sizes which wouldn’t be there had there been other F3 championships as well. Sadly, FIA’s flawed logic has prevented that. British, German and Italian F3s are dead, Spanish F3 (in its current iteration Euroformula Open) is limping on. There’s a massive void at that level that needs to be filled.
Iestyn Davies (@fastiesty)
11th July 2015, 1:21
Good to see the FIA still can’t do maths! A bit of an improvement..
David Not Coulthard (@davidnotcoulthard)
11th July 2015, 3:44
@fastiesty No they’re just trying to eliminate competition.
And I must say the excuse they’re using to do that is bl**dy brilliant.
Iestyn Davies (@fastiesty)
11th July 2015, 3:53
@davidnotcoulthard “12, 10, 7”.. uhoh. But I agree. Swap round F3 and FR3.5 and it starts to make more sense.
David-A (@david-a)
11th July 2015, 4:21
@fastiesty
The original proposal for F1’s current points system had a similar error too.
Iestyn Davies (@fastiesty)
11th July 2015, 5:19
@david-a @keithcollantine The FIA not learning from their mistakes? Not surprising in the slightest. Is it meant to be 13 for the win, but it was degraded to 12 because of ‘superstition’?!
Nase (@)
11th July 2015, 13:19
@david-a
Ouch.
The same thing is happening with Tour de France time bonuses. They used to be 20-12-8 seconds for the top 3 of every stage, then that system was abolished, and a couple of years later, a revised system resurfaces: 10-6-4.
Have these people never heard of monotony, or are they hell bent on avoiding it because a little bird told them it’s a synonym of “boredom”?
Frans
11th July 2015, 3:29
FR3.5 should at least be above of F3. Some drivers “move up” from F3 to FR3.5, which is from technical standpoint is correct, unfortunately from license point it is not. It isn’t like the competition in FR3.5 is worse than F3 (at least not before they make this license point).
R.J. O'Connell (@rjoconnell)
11th July 2015, 4:28
Except for the fact that it is this year.
David Not Coulthard (@davidnotcoulthard)
11th July 2015, 4:59
@rjoconnell Except that it’s only because of the silly points rule.
Alianora La Canta (@alianora-la-canta)
11th July 2015, 9:33
Formula Renault 3.5 has not had any rounds cancelled/terminated early due to collective driver incompetence this year. F3 has. That alone indicates the standard in Formula Renault 3.5 remains higher than in F3, given that F1 is not supposed to be the pinnacle of banger racing.
Iestyn Davies (@fastiesty)
11th July 2015, 6:14
Came up with my own proposal that probably fits better, and hopefully learned how to link and not mess it up in this forum comment
pal
11th July 2015, 10:02
FR3.5 should be equal to GP2.
lockup (@)
11th July 2015, 6:22
It is basically corrupt.
Unicron (@unicron2002)
11th July 2015, 8:10
This is all bull. Well intentioned yes, but complete crap and Verstappen (and many others over the years) has proved that. FIA you are boring me, sort out a budget cap instead of messing about with this.
lockup (@)
11th July 2015, 10:59
I don’t even see well-intentioned @unicron2002. FIA are not supposed to be selecting on performance, it’s supposed to be safety. That would mean on disciplinary record, age, number of races, things like that.
The idea of making hot but young drivers like Max wait is a good one, and recently we’re seeing that he is a bit young, but they could fix that by saying 19+ and 2 seasons of open-wheelers. There was no need for this points business at all.
It’s a blatant stitch-up, promoting their own series at the expense of others like Renault.
Alianora La Canta (@alianora-la-canta)
11th July 2015, 9:45
I do not feel the FIA has understood the problem regarding the Superlicence system. Nothing in the system guarantees, or even seriously implies, that the drivers who hold a Superlicence are going to be better than those who do not. Nothing here guarantees the drivers who have a Superlicence will be able to drive in a straight line (the purported point of the Superlicence). The continued overrating of F3 – which has been little more than a crashfest this year – compared to Formula 3.5, which is arguably the best preparation for F1, demonstrates this. The decisions on the points system appear to have been based on a combination of ideology and guesswork (F2 cannot be sensibly rated as above GP2 when it doesn’t exist and the previous version was a step down from GP3).
I’d rather see a system where an end-of-season test assessed potential new F1 drivers, who would need an invite from a F1 team to show up (and, ideally, also those F1 drivers who’d picked up too many penalty points or failed to score any points in the previous season, plus 2-3 randomly-selected “known good F1 driver” benchmarks). They could demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of all the various aspects of being a racing driver, have some surprise scenarios to make sure the test isn’t easy to “rote learn” and only those showing as above a certain standard would then receive the right to hold a Superlicence. (I’d also have every driver involved receive notes about where they were good and where they need to improve – some drivers have shown a worrying lack of awareness of their weak points, and this sort of feedback would improve the standard of junior racing).
Sharon H (@sharoncom)
11th July 2015, 20:37
I think stewards should be able to deduct Superlicense qualifying points for poor driving standards. I call it the “Canamasas Gambit”.
Michal (@michal2009b)
11th July 2015, 10:33
Personally I am not a fan of this system. It’s just another thing just complicating already over-complicated F1. I don’t think it will change much apart from creating another chaos.
Michal (@michal2009b)
11th July 2015, 10:38
Same applies to penalty points system. Look at their consistency, once they penalise the other time not. And it’s doubtful anyone will accumulate a race ban and even if he does that will only show he shouldn’t have had a superlicence. It’s another pointless thing. Maybe I am in minority but I feel that even every spin in the race, in the past regarded as simple driving mistake or car failure, it’s considered as 50/50 and no one knows what’s going on (Kimi in Canada).
Bobby (@f1bobby)
11th July 2015, 11:17
Typically bureaucratic solution to a problem that didn’t exist from the FIA. This is just a smokescreen to inflate/bury catagories as they see fit.
Unicron (@unicron2002)
11th July 2015, 18:55
Well said, another solution to a problem that doesn’t exist. A habit for both the FIA and the ‘Strategy’ Group over the past year or so
CountryGent (@countrygent)
11th July 2015, 12:11
It doesn’t change the fact that they are awarding an F3 series that carries their branding and sponsors more than a premiere class single seater in FR3.5 that develops almost double the amount of BHP.
It also doesn’t change the fact DTM drivers are, in essence, ineligible. Pascal Wehrlein will require three consecutive DTM titles if he wants a super-license whilst racing in DTM alone. Amusingly, whilst drivers like Wehrlein, Marvin Kirchofer and Dean Stoneman may struggle for eligibility, Will Power, Marcel Fassler and former GT driver Marc Lieb will have no problems.
Yes, speciation in international single seater racing is a valid problem because the true talent can be spread too thinly and it sometimes becomes difficult to deduce the most talented driver on offer (2014 scenario for example: who was doing the better job, Carlos Sainz Jr or Alex Lynn?). Creating a monopolistic system that steamrolls established mechanisms for F1 promotion is not the answer. So whilst the official justifications for this system are to tackle the series competition and the influx of “pay drivers” into F1 (a problem with an altogether more logical solution), it is not difficult to deduce that this is the FIA’s attempt to reclaim control of single seater racing.
Final point: even in the context of GP2, GP3 and FR3.5 all operating in parallel, have F1 teams truly struggled to spot the truly talented drivers?
anon
11th July 2015, 19:30
@countrygent, the latest proposal by the FIA is actually more lenient towards DTM than it was in the past – under the previous regulations, the DTM series held no value at all in terms of acquiring a superlicence, and to be honest nobody really cared about it (or at least I do not recall any protests about the old licence system from DTM drivers).
bezza695 (@bezza695)
11th July 2015, 12:32
don’t understand why its LMP1 only, why not LMP2, if the likes of F3 are on the list, LMP2 cars should easily be on the list?
seiche (@seiche)
11th July 2015, 13:39
Good news.
PorscheF1 (@xtwl)
11th July 2015, 16:23
So a consecutive triple DTM champ is only just enough for F1…
Andy (@andybantam)
12th July 2015, 10:52
Seems so.
So, if Paul di Resta appeared now, he probably wouldn’t have been given the chance to compete.
Sharon H (@sharoncom)
11th July 2015, 20:33
Formula Renault 3.5: 35 25 20 15 10 7 5 3 2 1 123
FIA F3 European championship 40 30 20 10 8 6 4 3 2 1 124
Something seems a bit off here, even if we ignore some of the driving standards that exist in the latter.
HK (@me4me)
12th July 2015, 11:02
I really dislike this system. I see no valid reason why the FIA had to introduce it.
Even though some teams need pay drivers, none of the teams are stupid enough to put a total rookie with unqualified skills in the car.
And then what about people like Pascal Wehrlein. He has done a great amount of testing with both Mercedes and Force India. He is no more of a safety risk than any other F1 driver. He has proven to be able to handle the car and do a decent job. I honestly have no idea how many license-points he actually has, but certainly he should deserve to be able to accept an offer from an F1 team if that possibility would arise.
This system is more unfair than some rookie like Max Verstappen bypassing a couple of junior categories.
Pat Ruadh (@fullcoursecaution)
12th July 2015, 20:20
I’m glad they realised the futility of awarding more than 40 points.
The single points still baffle me though, as I can’t imagine any situation where a one point would be a factor in getting over the line in a 3 year period.