Formula One’s new qualifying system was put to the test on Saturday in Melbourne and was found wanting. On Sunday the revamped tyre regulations and tighter radio restrictions will come under scrutiny.
The decision to grant drivers more freedom when selecting their tyre choices has already had a discernible effect. With plenty of super-softs in their tyre stacks, drivers overwhelmingly opted for the softest available rubber in qualifying.
The upshot of this is the top eight are all locked in to starting the race on their used super-softs from qualifying. The rest of the field has a free choice.
The temptation for the teams at the front of the field will be to try to stretch their opening stint on super-soft tyres long enough that they can complete the rest of the race with two further stops for for soft rubber. But it’s not clear how straightforward that might be.
Rain on Friday scuppered their attempts to run race simulations. A dry final practice session offered some opportunity for running during which two teams – Williams and Sauber – managed to eke out 15-lap runs on the super-soft tyre, while the Toro Rosso pair did 17 on the softs.
That would be insufficient for a two-stop race run and particularly challenging for those who have to start the race on used tyres. that could lead to teams hedging their bets at the second stop: risk going to the end on super-softs, accept the possibility of needing another set, or play it safe on mediums?
This will all play out within the context of much more limited radio communications with their drivers. Although teams can still advise their drivers to ‘push’ or ‘take it easy’ as needed, the kind of detailed coaching on lap times and strategy we used to see will be a thing of the past. Keeping their drivers on course for the optimum strategy is going to be harder for the strategists which will hopefully mean we see more improvisation.
But while there are lots unknowns for those of us watching, the armies of strategists and massive arsenals of computing power will have already eliminated many of the variables. Albert Park, however, is a venue which is quite capable of supplying a few more to keep the teams guesssing.
Go ad-free for just £1 per month
>> Find out more and sign up
Qualifying times in full
Driver | Car | Q1 | Q2 (vs Q1) | Q3 (vs Q2) | |
1 | Lewis Hamilton | Mercedes | 1’25.351 | 1’24.605 (-0.746) | 1’23.837 (-0.768) |
2 | Nico Rosberg | Mercedes | 1’26.934 | 1’24.796 (-2.138) | 1’24.197 (-0.599) |
3 | Sebastian Vettel | Ferrari | 1’26.945 | 1’25.257 (-1.688) | 1’24.675 (-0.582) |
4 | Kimi Raikkonen | Ferrari | 1’26.579 | 1’25.615 (-0.964) | 1’25.033 (-0.582) |
5 | Max Verstappen | Toro Rosso | 1’26.934 | 1’25.615 (-1.319) | 1’25.434 (-0.181) |
6 | Felipe Massa | Williams | 1’25.918 | 1’25.644 (-0.274) | 1’25.458 (-0.186) |
7 | Carlos Sainz Jnr | Toro Rosso | 1’27.057 | 1’25.384 (-1.673) | 1’25.582 (+0.198) |
8 | Daniel Ricciardo | Red Bull | 1’26.945 | 1’25.599 (-1.346) | 1’25.589 (-0.010) |
9 | Sergio Perez | Force India | 1’26.607 | 1’25.753 (-0.854) | |
10 | Nico Hulkenberg | Force India | 1’26.550 | 1’25.865 (-0.685) | |
11 | Valtteri Bottas | Williams | 1’27.135 | 1’25.961 (-1.174) | |
12 | Fernando Alonso | McLaren | 1’26.537 | 1’26.125 (-0.412) | |
13 | Jenson Button | McLaren | 1’26.740 | 1’26.304 (-0.436) | |
14 | Jolyon Palmer | Renault | 1’27.241 | 1’27.601 (+0.360) | |
15 | Kevin Magnussen | Renault | 1’27.297 | 1’27.742 (+0.445) | |
16 | Marcus Ericsson | Sauber | 1’27.435 | ||
17 | Felipe Nasr | Sauber | 1’27.958 | ||
18 | Daniil Kvyat | Red Bull | 1’28.006 | ||
19 | Romain Grosjean | Haas | 1’28.322 | ||
20 | Esteban Gutierrez | Haas | 1’26.645 | ||
21 | Rio Haryanto | Manor | 1’29.627 | ||
22 | Pascal Wehrlein | Manor | 1’29.642 |
Sector times
Driver | Sector 1 | Sector 2 | Sector 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Lewis Hamilton | 27.779 (1) | 22.380 (1) | 33.678 (2) |
Nico Rosberg | 28.018 (2) | 22.526 (2) | 33.653 (1) |
Sebastian Vettel | 28.093 (3) | 22.603 (3) | 33.979 (3) |
Kimi Raikkonen | 28.199 (4) | 22.743 (4) | 34.091 (4) |
Max Verstappen | 28.316 (6) | 22.930 (11) | 34.133 (7) |
Felipe Massa | 28.254 (5) | 22.835 (5) | 34.369 (8) |
Carlos Sainz Jnr | 28.358 (8) | 22.913 (7) | 34.105 (5) |
Daniel Ricciardo | 28.456 (10) | 22.918 (8) | 34.108 (6) |
Sergio Perez | 28.375 (9) | 22.871 (6) | 34.466 (11) |
Nico Hulkenberg | 28.335 (7) | 22.921 (9) | 34.486 (12) |
Valtteri Bottas | 28.525 (11) | 22.923 (10) | 34.442 (9) |
Fernando Alonso | 28.634 (13) | 23.037 (12) | 34.454 (10) |
Jenson Button | 28.620 (12) | 23.117 (13) | 34.567 (13) |
Jolyon Palmer | 28.929 (17) | 23.324 (16) | 34.940 (16) |
Kevin Magnussen | 29.038 (18) | 23.296 (15) | 34.894 (15) |
Marcus Ericsson | 28.789 (16) | 23.430 (19) | 35.089 (17) |
Felipe Nasr | 29.288 (20) | 23.344 (17) | 35.326 (20) |
Daniil Kvyat | 29.228 (19) | 23.516 (20) | 35.164 (19) |
Romain Grosjean | 28.732 (14) | 23.352 (18) | 35.099 (18) |
Esteban Gutierrez | 28.758 (15) | 23.213 (14) | 34.674 (14) |
Rio Haryanto | 30.132 (22) | 23.771 (22) | 35.724 (21) |
Pascal Wehrlein | 30.049 (21) | 23.633 (21) | 35.960 (22) |
Speed trap
Pos | Driver | Car | Engine | Speed (kph/mph) | Gap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nico Hulkenberg | Force India | Mercedes | 330.3 (205.2) | |
2 | Valtteri Bottas | Williams | Mercedes | 329.8 (204.9) | -0.5 |
3 | Felipe Massa | Williams | Mercedes | 328.7 (204.2) | -1.6 |
4 | Sergio Perez | Force India | Mercedes | 328.4 (204.1) | -1.9 |
5 | Lewis Hamilton | Mercedes | Mercedes | 328.1 (203.9) | -2.2 |
6 | Sebastian Vettel | Ferrari | Ferrari | 325.9 (202.5) | -4.4 |
7 | Pascal Wehrlein | Manor | Mercedes | 325.8 (202.4) | -4.5 |
8 | Kimi Raikkonen | Ferrari | Ferrari | 325.8 (202.4) | -4.5 |
9 | Nico Rosberg | Mercedes | Mercedes | 325.3 (202.1) | -5.0 |
10 | Esteban Gutierrez | Haas | Ferrari | 325.3 (202.1) | -5.0 |
11 | Rio Haryanto | Manor | Mercedes | 324.8 (201.8) | -5.5 |
12 | Romain Grosjean | Haas | Ferrari | 324.2 (201.4) | -6.1 |
13 | Marcus Ericsson | Sauber | Ferrari | 322.7 (200.5) | -7.6 |
14 | Felipe Nasr | Sauber | Ferrari | 322.1 (200.1) | -8.2 |
15 | Kevin Magnussen | Renault | Renault | 321.4 (199.7) | -8.9 |
16 | Carlos Sainz Jnr | Toro Rosso | Ferrari | 320.9 (199.4) | -9.4 |
17 | Daniel Ricciardo | Red Bull | TAG Heuer | 320.8 (199.3) | -9.5 |
18 | Jolyon Palmer | Renault | Renault | 320.6 (199.2) | -9.7 |
19 | Jenson Button | McLaren | Honda | 320.4 (199.1) | -9.9 |
20 | Fernando Alonso | McLaren | Honda | 320.2 (199.0) | -10.1 |
21 | Daniil Kvyat | Red Bull | TAG Heuer | 319.6 (198.6) | -10.7 |
22 | Max Verstappen | Toro Rosso | Ferrari | 319.6 (198.6) | -10.7 |
Over to you
What are your expectations for the Australian Grand Prix? Can Nico Rosberg take the fight to Lewis Hamilton? Will Ferrari be able to take the fight to Mercedes?
Share your views on the Australian Grand Prix in the comments.
2016 Australian Grand Prix
- Third Driver of the Weekend win for Grosjean
- F1 enjoys best season-opening race since 2009
- 2016 Australian Grand Prix team radio transcript
- Top ten pictures from the 2016 Australian Grand Prix
- 2016 Australian Grand Prix Predictions Championship results
WilliamB (@william-brierty)
19th March 2016, 19:41
“Can Nico Rosberg take the fight to Lewis Hamilton? Will Ferrari be able to take the fight to Mercedes?”
No…
Johannes (@johanness)
19th March 2016, 22:55
Exactly. That, the crap commentary (where’s DC?) & painful new rules means we’re in for another frustrating snooze-fest of a year.
glynh (@glynh)
19th March 2016, 20:25
Hopefully rosberg keeps the pressure on Hamilton and that keeps the ferrari’s in contention. It will also be interesting to see if verstappen can hold fifth, there should be some good battles there.
I’m predicting 16 finishers.
JohnNik (@johnnik)
19th March 2016, 21:13
Top 5 on the grid is my predictions championship prediction, so I hope he does hold on to it!
ruliemaulana (@ruliemaulana)
19th March 2016, 21:29
Massa & Perez speed trap number are a clear danger for Verstappen & Sainz. But I hope both of them made a great start.
hahostolze (@hahostolze)
19th March 2016, 20:30
The midfield battle, basically everyone from Kimi back to Hulk, will be epic, I think.
Lauri (@f1lauri)
19th March 2016, 22:44
As long as Max keeps his cool with Kimi on the first laps.
Minardi (@gitanes)
19th March 2016, 22:07
So they must use 2 types of compounds in the race, at least one of them to be one of the 2 nominated tyres for the race. ?? What?
How could a driver pick 2 compounds for the race and have neither of them be one of the 2 nominated tyres? Am I missing something? Or should I not be surprised that they didn’t really think this through?
TheApexPreditor
19th March 2016, 22:34
Pirreli nominate two of the three tire types brought to each race as the nominated tires (in this case they have med, soft, super soft, Pirelli nominated the medium and the soft) so the drivers MUST use one of those two types, AND another type in the race if dry. And actually, reading that back I see what you’re saying. If they have to use two types and they’ve nominated two types out of three, how can they NOT use one of the nominated types? That has to be a typo–do they only nominate one of the three?
Sonics (@sonicslv)
20th March 2016, 1:31
@gitanes Pirreli only nominated 2 set of tires and they could be the same compound. So for example if the available compound is super soft, soft, and medium, and Pirelli nominated medium-medium, the driver can’t race with only soft and supersofts
Tyler (@tdog)
19th March 2016, 22:18
@keithcollantine with the new tyre rules, would it be possible to include, in the race preview, a table of how many sets of new and used of each compound, that each driver has for the race? Or are you aware of such information being published elsewhere?
Jimmi Cynic
19th March 2016, 22:30
Keith published the driver tire choices over 10 days ago:
https://www.racefans.net/2016/03/08/drivers-tyre-selections-first-race-announced/
Still…would be good to see in the pre-race thread for those us in F1 with short memories. ;-)
Tyler (@tdog)
19th March 2016, 23:13
They have to give tyres back throughout the weekend, and some of the remaining sets will be new, some used from practice and qualy. So what the divers start the weekend with is not the same as what they have available for the race, and affects their strategy options. If that could be published here, or if anyone can point me to this info, I’d be grateful!
Yes (@come-on-kubica)
19th March 2016, 23:09
I forgot about Exteban’s great time in the Haas. Another reason this qualfying failed. He prodcued a superb lap but got screwed over by dodgy rules.
sato113 (@sato113)
19th March 2016, 23:31
Only 8 drivers go through to Q3? that rule change passed me by!
I think 6 should drop out in q1, 6 in q2, leaving a top 10 shootout for q3…
Mike
19th March 2016, 23:40
Wow! 330km/h! On Albert park! That’s mind blowing.
Mike (@grippgoat)
20th March 2016, 3:20
And only a 10 kph gap between first and last! Isn’t it usually like a 20-30kph gap?
Dave
19th March 2016, 23:49
Wasn’t the track lap record set by Schumacher back in 2004 with a 1:24:125? Lewis had a faster time today, but I’ve heard no one talking about it. I assume I must be missing something?
Minardi (@gitanes)
20th March 2016, 0:47
The outright lap record is held by Vettel at 1:23.529.
Schumacher still holds the race record.
Dave
20th March 2016, 4:03
Ok, that still makes no sense to me. If Vettel has the fastest lap, why is that not the lap record? Because it was in qualifying? Then why does Barrichello have the fastest lap at Monza, which was set in qualifying?
Beau Rouge
20th March 2016, 0:42
Force India first to start on good rubber. No wonder they did not want to improve in Q2.
Thomson (@fish123)
20th March 2016, 1:25
I think Ferrari will try something different to Mercedes:
Mercedes: Super-soft – Soft – Soft
Ferrari: Super-soft – Medium – Super-soft
So then Vettel will be on the faster tyre at the end and will be able to fight the Mercedes’ drivers.
Force India (Perez) may try a one-stop
Soft – Medium
He might be able to finish 5th or who knows maybe even a podium??
Race Predictions:
1. Vettel
2. Hamilton
3. Perez
4. Raikkonen
5. Rosberg
6. Verstappen
7. Sainz
8. Hulkenberg
TomMK (@tommk)
21st March 2016, 2:59
Gutierrez’s Q1 time can’t be right? @keithcollantine
Ian Stephens (@ians)
21st March 2016, 18:58
I think it was 1:29.06.
Ian Stephens (@ians)
21st March 2016, 18:58
Sorry, 1:29.606.