The original start of the Australian Grand Prix was aborted due to momentary confusion over whether the field was ready to start.
Race control had noted two separate points of concern ahead of the initial start which prompted the decision to delay it.
Race control could not see what the marshal was alerting them to. However they had noticed Sergio Perez had failed to pull into his correct starting position of tenth and had begun re-positioning his Force India.
It was in this moment of uncertainty over whether there was one or two separate problems on the grid that race control decided to delay the start in the interest of safety. The field was sent around on a second formation lap.
However as all the drivers were able to pull away and continue, no driver was held responsible for delaying the start and therefore no one was required to start the race from the pit lane.
Ricciardo had originally qualified in tenth position. However he was demoted to 15th place by a five-place grid penalty for a gearbox change, then had to start from the pits after experiencing a technical problem on his reconnaissance lap.
During last year’s Austrian Grand Prix the start was given despite Pascal Wehrlein having to reverse into his correct starting position having stopped too late on the grid.
2017 F1 season
- Sepang pays Haas compensation for Grosjean’s 2017 crash
- Williams revenues rose in 2017 after Bottas deal with Mercedes
- Australian Grand Prix cost government £56 million last year
- “Grand Prix Driver” takes you inside McLaren’s nightmare final year with Honda
- Undisputed champion: 10 titles name Hamilton top driver of 2017
@F1-liners (@f1-liners)
26th March 2017, 12:42
Having the only driver from OZ still in the pit, and rumours of fuel saving, did not hurt the decision either :p
kpcart
26th March 2017, 16:15
don’t start any conspiracies please Donald Trump :)
Pieletjie
26th March 2017, 16:25
The conspiracy theorists are the ones who still can’t get to grip with losing to Trump. Still pushing the Russian hacking fantasy four months after their election loss, and still not giving any hint of positive evidence to back it up. But hey, why should they let the truth ruin it for them?
Wombat757 (@jmcmillan757)
26th March 2017, 21:36
Because unlike you, most people don’t run on television commercial time.
Mr Sheen
27th March 2017, 6:21
Theories other than all the clearly defined political and financial links to Russia you mean?
Ben (@chookie6018)
26th March 2017, 16:56
There was a lot of confusion from the marshalls throughout the midfield and it was just a precaution. For those who think it was for Riccardo. It probably helped him by 40 seconds not the 5 minutes he needed.
Sensord4notbeingafanboi (@peartree)
26th March 2017, 18:40
The first thing on my mind was how could teams try to indeed exploit these re starts to get their way either on tyres or fuel.
NewVerstappenFan (@jureo)
28th March 2017, 10:09
Long time F1Fanatic right here, thinks of loopholes right away.