The contest between Nico Hulkenberg and Jolyon Palmer at Renault was such a one-sided affair it came as no surprise to anyone that Palmer was shown the door before the year was out.
The qualifying scoreline was especially brutal. Palmer suffered 15 consecutive defeats in qualifying (he was unable to set a time in Azerbaijan due to a technical problem) and his 0.838 second average deficit to Hulkenberg was the largest of any driver.
Go ad-free for just £1 per month
>> Find out more and sign up
And while Palmer was classified in front of Hulkenberg on three occasions, two of those require some qualification. In Malaysia Hulkenberg had gambled on an unusual strategy which backfired, forcing him to make a late pit stop, while Palmer spun twice. In Hungary he had to let Hulkenberg past (“Jo is slower than you”, he was told).
In Palmer’s defence, there were times when Hulkenberg had newer parts on his car before his team mate did. But that alone doesn’t explain a difference of this size.
Hulkenberg vs Palmer: The scores
Hulkenberg vs Palmer: Season results
| AUS | CHI | BAH | RUS | SPA | MON | CAN | AZE | AUS | GRE | HUN | BEL | ITA | SIN | MAL | JAP | ||
| Nico Hulkenberg | Q | ||||||||||||||||
| R | |||||||||||||||||
| Jolyon Palmer | Q | ||||||||||||||||
| R |
Hulkenberg vs Sainz
On the face of it Carlos Sainz Jnr’s results look little better than Palmer’s. But there are a few important details to keep in mind, not least the fact that Renault’s reliability problems late in the season compromised the efforts of both drivers.
Despite having to get to grips with an unfamiliar car, Sainz was immediately much closer to Hulkenberg’s pace than Palmer had been. On average he was within three-tenths of a second of the team’s established driver in qualifying.
2017 F1 season review
- The complete F1 Fanatic 2017 Formula One season review
- 2017 F1 season in stats: The 68th season in context
- Essential reads 2017: The best articles and your favourite features
- Take the F1 Fanatic 2017 end-of-season quiz
- F1 Fanatic’s top Tweets of 2017
KnGS (@)
1st December 2017, 13:02
2018 will be absolutely delicious from a neutral fan’s view. Tensions will hike at Renault if they have a car at Force India level. We saw Ocon and Perez duke it out this year. They’ll be more mature next year but Sainz and Hulkenberg are going to be very evenly matched unless Renault power plays spoilsport.
Jere (@jerejj)
1st December 2017, 17:00
@godoff1 +1.
ruliemaulana (@ruliemaulana)
1st December 2017, 18:43
@godoff1 Yes. Both Ocon-Perez and Sainz-Hulkenberg pairs are the one to watch. On the other news, since the ex-FIA technical guy could effectively push Renault on Force India after April 1st, I hope there could be a four way battle between them soon enough.
ruliemaulana (@ruliemaulana)
1st December 2017, 18:44
*push Renault to Force India level
Yuri (@yulocke)
1st December 2017, 19:09
+1 Force India and Renault exciting driver pairings
Hugh (@hugh11)
1st December 2017, 13:13
Surely Hungary shouldn’t count as Palmer finishing ahead because Hulkenberg retired from the race? Same with Alonso at Canada etc. I know, the 75% rule, but I’d only count it as finishing ahead if both cars saw the flag.
Next year does look very interesting, with Sainz having time with the team over winter, and the possibility that the car could be a bit better next year too, and of course with a much better driver pairing. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Renault closer to McLaren that McLaren are to Red Bull. Hulkenberg and Sainz is also probably the 3rd or 4th strongest line up on the grid.
Cristian (@panzik)
1st December 2017, 14:21
I think Renault will be much closer to RB than McLaren to RB, then i finally hope to see Hulk fighting for podiums, i really really hope that.
nase
1st December 2017, 16:03
@hugh11
Just a minor correction, other than that I agree with what you said:
The 75% rule marks the minimum race distance needed for full points. The cutoff for being classified is 90% of the race distance.
Hugh (@hugh11)
1st December 2017, 18:27
Ah. Could’ve sworn it was 75%. Either way, still don’t think it should count as being classified.
Esploratore
4th December 2017, 6:23
Also you counted belgium qualifying for hulkenberg! Palmer did better than hulk in q2 and had a problem before he set a lap in q3, hulk never beat palmer’s q2 time, mechanical problems should be excluded!
Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine)
4th December 2017, 15:40
I see where you’re coming from but I don’t necessarily agree using Q2 times in this example would always be more representative.
For instance imagine driver A and driver B from the same team do their first runs on new tyres in in Q2. Driver A does a time quick enough to go through but driver B does not. Driver B therefore runs again using another set of new tyres and, thanks to track evolution, sets a time which is faster than Driver A’s. The statistic would tell us Driver B had done a better job, when arguably that isn’t the case.