Daniel Ricciardo, Renault, Silverstone, 2019

Ricciardo: Renault more competitive than times show

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: Daniel Ricciardo believes Renault should be contenders for Q3 at Silverstone.

[dietersinboxpromo]

What they say

Ricciardo summarised a mixed first day at Silverstone for Renault:

The times sheets don’t show too much optimism. But I think we are better than that.

For sure we’ve still got some work to do but I think there’s some lap time on the table which we can get quite quickly. But to put us into that P7, P8 area we do need to find a little bit more. I think we are currently good enough to get inside the top 10, but [only] just. I think we obviously want to get a bit deeper in there.

There’s still a few things to discover on the car. I had a bit of an issue this afternoon for the long run but other than that not a bad day. We won’t be up ’til midnight but we’ll do a bit more work tonight to get a bit more out of it.

We split the set-ups for a little bit, then we got a bit closer in the afternoon, myself and Nico [Hulkenberg]. We’re still a little bit different in some areas so we’ll just try and work out which direction to follow.

Quotes: Dieter Rencken

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

Does F1 need to do more to avoid clashes with other sporting events?

The clash is a real problem for fans of multiple sports. if you factor in the Tour de France as well, there is a lot of sport competing for our attention (personally I am interested in all four events – what to do?)

I’m a bit surprised they didn’t have a double-header with Austria – then it would have been clashing with the Tour de France only. there were no Cricket World Cup games last Sunday and Wimbledon traditionally has a rest day on the middle Sunday (which it did this year because there were few rain delays in the first week).

In an era of very dull races and a waning television audience, all efforts should have gone into avoiding this clash. These other events are in the calendar many months in advance, so F1 could schedule accordingly.
@Frood19

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Pawelf1, Robert, Voaridase, Hoolyf1, Paul Sainsbury, Swh1386, Paul Schofield and Swh1386!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

26 comments on “Ricciardo: Renault more competitive than times show”

  1. Regarding the COTD,Some years ago F1 realised such midsummer clashes were inevitable and quickly moved to make the cars quieter so fans at the track could listen to their other sports while watching the GP. Stop complaining.



    ;-

    1. Why is this not COTD??? …year?

    2. Haha.

      But really, when have they ever cared about clashes with other sports? They rarely care about clashes with other motorsport! All those years clashing with Le Mans.

      Also I know they’re not on at the same time, but somehow I’ve got to find time to watch F1, FE (2 races) and IndyCar this weekend. Ideally I’d like to watch the F2 and F3 as well, but it might be a challenge!

      1. I think the clashes are more pertinent to UK audience because this is our only free-to-air race. @jerejj made some good points about how it’s not incumbent on F1 alone to avoid clashes, but the sport does have that air of insularity about it that suggests it has never cared about clashing with anything, even le mans as you say. It all feels very ecclestone-esque.

  2. That Rich Energy tweet is the very definition of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Storey proudly showing that Haas fail to see how the other investors can wrestle control from him, but oh by the way, he is in control of a company about to be insolvent. Well done.

    1. I have not been this entertained in ages, I can tell you that.

      1. Following a board meeting of Rich Energy Ltd chaired by CEO William Storey and in light of the treacherous conduct of minority stakeholders the exclusive rights to distribute @rich_energy have been transferred to another company. Mr Storey retains complete ownership #RichEnergy

        1. Any more popcorn and I’ll fall ill :)

    2. the Rich Energy saga is already the highlight of the season

  3. When you consider the vast amounts of money and effort the teams put into a widget here, a slot there, a serrated edge elsewhere, all in the cause of cleaning up the airflow I can’t help feeling that the cockpit camera (see photo at top) must be hugely counterproductive, especially as it would seem to directly interrupt the flow onto the rear wing, surely a more streamlined/smaller camera could do the job.

    1. @hohum – two things that probably mitigate (but not eliminate) the impact are:
      a) the rear wings are lower now, so roiled air coming off the camera housing to impact the wing had a smaller effect
      b) IIRC, the camera housing has a teardrop profile when seen from the side, which is very aero-friendly – the tail of the teardrop prevents a vacuum forming (which would otherwise cause drag).

      1. @phylyp, Hmm’ suppose so, it just looks very clunky in the photo and obliterates some of the text on the wing, would that teardrop follow the dimensions that professor Kamm believed necessary to significantly reduce drag.

        1. obliterates some of the text on the wing

          @hohum – now you’re talking. Get teams to say the camera obscures the sponsorship message, and the F1 world will unify in a way never seen before to fix the problem ;)

  4. And another thing, Williams clearly demonstrate that the Tyre-change crew are entirely separate from the engineering crew, so I say again that the mandatory pit stops are an expense that could be done away with, flights and accommodation for a team that size* must be expensive.
    * Ok, a few may be needed for other duties (getting the boss a cuppa etc.) and some for wet races but the FIA could mandate 1 person per wheel for that, making the choice to change even more crucial and exciting.

    1. @hohum, you are mixing up two entirely different sets of personnel and are therefore coming to an erroneous assumption.

      There is no separate “tyre change crew” – the mechanics that change the tyres are the same mechanics that prepare the cars, as changing the tyres during the pit stops is a secondary function that they have. They’re still going to be there, irrespective of whether there is or isn’t a pit stop, so you are not going to be saving anything.

      1. @hohum @anon
        Was just going to point that out. However, reducing the amount of mechanics in general, and thus the number of people available to do the pitstops, could significantly reduce cost.

  5. Counterpoint: Do other sports need to do more to avoid clashing with F1?

    I’ll get my coat.

    1. @ahxshades – that’s a fair question.

      Under normal circumstances, I’d say it would be in the interest of all organizers (FOM, ICC, the tennis dudes) to rationalize their schedules so as to maximize TV viewers.

      However, Liberty seem to be focused on growing their casual viewer base, by bringing in new fans. In that circumstance, it might help them to take the lead to ensure they don’t lose their intended new viewers.

      Liberty also seem to be focused on growing their US and Asia viewer base, so they might be more concerned about competing events for viewers in those geographies (such as Indycar, Nascar, baseball and ̶f̶o̶o̶t̶ handball in the US, cricket and football in Asia).

      1. Liberty seem to be focused on growing their casual viewer base, by bringing in new fans.

        Apart from clashing with other major sports events, moving away from free-to-air seems terribly counterproductive with regard to this core focus. Quite baffling really.

        1. @jeffreyj – yeah, very good point. You need a lot of enthusiasm amongst fans before you can convince a new fan to pay up for F1 TV Pro, or to subscribe to a premium TV package that covers F1.

    2. @ahxshades You took the words from me; I was about the post something similar. People always seem to blame F1 for more or less any given weekend clash as if these were solely F1’s fault. Should everyone want to avoid clashes to the greatest extent possible, then all parties should be required and willing to make sacrifices to contribute to that, not only F1. If F1 were to circle every other sports event there is, race events of different Motorsport categories, etc., then there’d be zero weekends left for the F1 races.

  6. Renault should be contenders for Q3

    A factory team with a large budget and it “should”?
    Renault should be fighting for 4th place in the constructors chanpionship at least if not more.
    It’s a disgrace with two of the best drivers still competing with the lower midfield.

  7. jsw11984 (@jarred-walmsley)
    13th July 2019, 10:16

    @keithcollantine

    Shouldn’t this be Renault?

    Ricciardo summarised a mixed first day at Silverstone for Red Bull:

  8. When you have a sport that runs for almost half of the weekends in a year, yes it will clash with other things on during the year.

  9. Pat Ruadh (@fullcoursecaution)
    13th July 2019, 12:25

    Really looking forward to this weekends action. Not because it looks like it will be close, but because it’s the one weekend of the year I don’t have to listen to Crofty having a conniption on lap 1.

    Leigh McKenzie is having a busy weekend, Wimbledon for the BBC yesterday and F1 for C4 today.

Comments are closed.