Alexander Albon, Red Bull, Sochi Autodrom, 2019

Albon won’t be distracted by prospect of 2020 seat

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: Alexander Albon says he won’t be distracted the possibility Red Bull could decide his F1 future this weekend.

What they say

Red Bull motorsport consultant Helmut Marko has indicated a decision on the team’s driver line-up for the 2020 F1 season will be taken around this weekend’s race. Albon said he won’t dwell on the possibility he could get a full season in the seat he was promoted to last month:

I don’t think it will change too much. I don’t think my approach would change because I have a deadline in that sense I think.

The way I’ve been going about things this year has been the same since winter testing and it’s just been about focussing on each race as it comes. I think if I do a good enough job or not, time will tell at Mexico but it doesn’t mean I’m going to be… I don’t think it’s possible to be putting more effort before Mexico and then not put the effort after it gets decided.

I’ll keep the same mentality going through the year and into next year as well. And then if it’s good enough it’s good enough.

Quotes: Dieter Rencken

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

Should F1 change its penalty system – or do we need to be more patient with the stewards?

While I quite like the long lap idea, I think the current situation (five/10 second penalties for “minor” infringements, stop/go and drive-through penalties for more serious ones) works pretty well. The issue in Japan was the stewards indecision in whether or not to investigate Leclerc.

The stewards are under enormous pressure, there is no doubt about that. F1 is a fast paced sport and they probably feel the need to investigate incidents as quickly as possible because they know us keyboard warriors will have their heads if they dilly dally. I say give them the space and time to review the evidence and make a decision… if we all cut them some slack they will make good decisions. To be fair, they made the right decisions in the end in the F1 examples highlighted in the article (Leclerc in Suzuka and Vettel in Canada).
@Geemac

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Manatcna!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

8 comments on “Albon won’t be distracted by prospect of 2020 seat”

  1. How can Nissan possibly be that blind. We JUST got away from every major team in the WEC using that exact combination, Toyota still has that, F1 had a bunch of those the last decade.
    Audi HAS THE SAME COMBINATION IN THE SAME SERIES !

    (insert rage meme here, like you would in any real comment section tools)

    1. Actually Audi has some green; it’s Porsche that has the exact same colours, and there’ll be confusion with Mahendra as well, which has a similar livery with dark blue instead of black. But overall, the Formula E liveries will be less alike than last season at least, when for example the HWA’s and Jaguar’s were undistinguishable.

      Nissan deserves some credit because this year Mercedes has simple imitated last year’s Nissan livery, so thanks Nissan for changing it.

    2. insert rage meme here, like you would in any real comment section tools

      Actually one of the plusses of this comment section is that you cannot insert memes and other page fillers, @uneedafinn2win. It encourages people to use words (and in many cases reasoning) to make their points.
      An up/down-vote, or at least ‘report abuse’ button, would be welcome though IMO.

  2. Regarding the COTD: I agree, in principle, for everything except for the ‘Leclerc in Suzuka’ part. He shouldn’t have received a penalty for the lap one-incident anymore than Sainz for his incident with Albon at Lesmo 2 in Monza. They’re effectively carbon-copies of each other. Sainz similarly understeered into Albon, and as a result, forced him off the track, yet Leclerc received a penalty for a not-massively-indifferent incident at the exit of Suzuka T1-T2. The Stewards should stick to their decisions, not go back on them.

    Mclaren-tweet: Why don’t they use the MP4-25, or MP4-26, or perhaps even the MP4-20 for these types of occasions instead? The MP4-28 was horrible AF in its active season, LOL.

    1. Mclaren-tweet: Why don’t they use the MP4-25, or MP4-26, or perhaps even the MP4-20 for these types of occasions instead?

      I think that’s because it is the most recent car they can run themselves, given they no longer have a relationship with Mercedes (to run the hybrid 2014 car) or any of the Honda hybrids. The aim of the test is to give the prize winner a run in a representative F1 car.

  3. The question should really be if F1 should have a penalty system. A system that lumps all kinds of misdemeanors, be it on track and off track, serious and benign and them assigns illogical weights to those infractions.
    The penalty system is a big mess and needs to be scrapped or overhauled completely.

    1. That’s an interesting concept: ask the driver to pull into the pits so an FIA official can fit some “penalty weight” to the car, then allow the car to rejoin the race. Of course, being the FIA, they might not fit the weight in “less than 10 seconds”.

  4. RedBull will probably now promote Daniil, drop Albon, and bring Jenson Button into Toro Rosso, just to keep the drivers on their toes.

Comments are closed.