Norris pipped to IndyCar iRacing pole by McLaughlin

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: Lando Norris narrowly missed out on pole position for today’s IndyCar iRacing Challenge event to Scott McLaughlin.

IndyCar iRacing Challenge Indianapolis grid

McLaughlin led Norris and ex-F1 racer Scott Speed in qualifying for today’s race on Indianapolis Motor Speedway, meaning the top three places were swept by non-IndyCar drivers. The 33-car field was covered by less than two-tenths of a second.

Position Number Driver Time (s) Speed (mph)
1 40 Scott McLaughlin 39.432 228.241
2 4 Lando Norris 39.439 228.201
3 39 Scott Speed 39.446 228.16
4 15 Graham Rahal 39.448 228.148
5 20 Ed Carpenter 39.449 228.143
6 33 James Davison 39.452 228.125
7 12 Will Power 39.453 228.12
8 55 Alex Palou 39.454 228.114
9 24 Sage Karam 39.454 228.114
10 22 Simon Pagenaud 39.457 228.096
11 25 Stefan Wilson 39.458 228.091
12 99 RC Enerson 39.461 228.073
13 1 Josef Newgarden 39.463 228.062
14 8 Marcus Ericsson 39.467 228.039
15 30 Takuma Sato 39.473 228.004
16 10 Felix Rosenqvist 39.477 227.981
17 26 Zach Veach 39.478 227.975
18 5 Pato O’Ward 39.482 227.952
19 41 Dalton Kellett 39.485 227.935
20 27 Alexander Rossi 39.486 227.929
21 18 Santino Ferrucci 39.489 227.912
22 31 Conor Daly 39.494 227.883
23 7 Oliver Askew 39.494 227.883
24 88 Colton Herta 39.495 227.877
25 14 Tony Kanaan 39.497 227.865
26 98 Marco Andretti 39.521 227.727
27 60 Jack Harvey 39.521 227.727
28 9 Scott Dixon 39.522 227.721
29 4 Sebastien Bourdais 39.522 227.721
30 21 Rinus Veekay 39.529 227.681
31 28 Ryan Hunter-Reay 39.541 227.612
32 59 Max Chilton 39.557 227.52
33 911 Helio Castroneves 39.614 227.192

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

Is now the right time to lower F1’s budget cap further?

Surely it’s about time some common sense prevailed, and teams/FOM and the FIA stop this silly haggling over the cost cap.

Last year a cap of $175 million was agreed. At no time was I said that any team “had” to spend that level and it was generally agreed that the top teams were the only ones that would be anywhere near that cap and would be for quite some time to come.

Now, the teams that had no chance of getting anywhere near that cap are looking to have it lowered. Even if it’s lowered to 100 million, a couple (or more) teams would still be hard pressed to get there.

So why all this haggling and potential fallout regarding the cap? It’s a given, and has been for years, that the top teams will still retain an advantage budget wise for several years until the other teams budgets start to converge, lowering the cap will still have a convergence factor, albeit shorter, but it was agreed previously that the convergence path was tolerable.

All I see happening is some teams trying to take advantage of a bad situation to force the larger teams out of the competition or at least cause them major disruption. They’re not trying to aid survival – if they don’t have the budget to continue next year, then lowering the cap won’t change that – their budget will still be the same, as will their results.

If indeed there was interest in ensuring that there will be teams capable of competing next year, the discussions should be about setting up a temporary facility to provide all teams equal share from revenue or a guaranteed loan facility that teams could draw upon to stay solvent not discussions to change the budget cap that was agreed to and signed off.
DB-C90 (@Dbradock)

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Adam Kibbey and Ruliemaulana!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

17 comments on “Norris pipped to IndyCar iRacing pole by McLaughlin”

  1. It will be fun watching this as a another distraction with no real racing going on, but what does qualifying once again tell us? Lando and McLaughlin have the most sim experience by MILES, and have a huge advantage over the rest of the field. I can’t wait to see him after F1 go into turn one at the start of the 500 going 240+ mph and not lift, or crap his pants. Four terrifying laps of qualifying at the limit of adhesion also will be an experience he will never forget.

    1. Yeah, and not just Indy. I imagine one does some serious soul-searching before getting on any of the ovals. When I’m watching these guys on ovals, I am fearing for their lives more often than not.

  2. Ross Brawn has a good grasp of what’s required to get F1 started and how Austria is a suitable venue, but I don’t see any advantage over Silverstone, and Silverstone has the advantage of having the majority of the teams already there whereas every team will have to travel across borders to get to Austria. Maybe it’s the old Bernie ploy of playing off tracks against each other to get a better deal.

    1. He/they seem to have a grasp up to a point.

      When I see things like “easy to charter a plane to get there” and catering can be provided, I’m wondering who is going to pick up the tab for the extra (if any) costs.

      Most team personnel travel commercial (or in busses/trucks between European tracks) & chartering normally involves much higher costs. I’d guess that all the medical testing etc that would need to be done would also involve a not insignificant cost.

      I’d like to know whether there has been any determination as to who is going to pay the additional costs. Will it be the teams, most of which are struggling financially, or Liberty, further eroding any potential income?

      They also seem to have thought through how to get people there and keep them isolated, but there’s no mention on how they get them back home or to the next venue in a timely manner, which involves not only keeping them all healthy, but also getting agreement from more countries than just Austria.

      1. I can’t see where logistics is going more expensive than usual. It will certainly be very cheap to charter planes & buses at the moment (book ’em for the year at dimes on the dollar) and given no fans are attending they should easily be able to take over entire hotels wherever they go. The only new costs will be additional cleaning, organising no-touch services & testing and maybe extra staff for associated supervision/security & perhaps medical/epidemiological monitoring.
        They’ve now had a long time to plan all this and they’ll certainly start in an over-the-top fashion. Failure is not an option.

        1. @didaho whilst demand for air freight services is down a bit, it’s not gone down anywhere near as much as passenger flight demand has – I’d be surprised if that was that much cheaper.

          If anything, some have suggested it will be the opposite – that, because the volume of flights has reduced, those who are still flying are charging more to keep their total revenue up.

          1. The biggest issue for freight, Anon, is that normally it gets carried along with all the thousands of passenger planes that are flyign around. Since there are hardly any of those out there now, it is an issue to transport freight, since only the few planes used for transport of goods only are available.

            Transport is relatively easily solved as @didaho mentions. DHL has dedicated planes for them, they will use those, just like they always do. And freight can off course be sent by truck from the UK too, road transport is more or less working. There is an airport relatively close to the Red Bull ring that can be used. Then the crews can be transferred from there with helicopters and smaller aircraft or busses directly. And yeah, there is a boatload of hotels that are empty now since there are no tourists in an area that normally has tourists AND the fans.

      2. @dbradock Indeed. Should there still be a mandatory 14-day quarantine in place for people entering the country in question, the first Silverstone-race could only take place on August 2 at the earliest if there’s a second Red Bull Ring-race on July 12. The same also goes for other places in this scenario.

    2. Alianora La Canta (@alianora-la-canta)
      2nd May 2020, 19:16

      @hohum Because Austria is 2 weeks earlier on the orginal schedule. If Hungary doesn’t happen (and that’s entirely plausible at this point), there’ll be plenty of time for both Austria and the UK to have double rounds.

      1. @alianora-la-canta, Plenty of time for 4 races ? Sure, but we’re already at 10 races cancelled and more in doubt.

        1. Alianora La Canta (@alianora-la-canta)
          4th May 2020, 0:18

          @hohum We are, but we can’t schedule those races into a slot they cannot occupy. The point of doubling-up venues is to get some races done while waiting for the situation to clear up elsewhere. We definitely won’t get back every race that has been lost, but getting as many races as safely practicable held is important to F1 – not only to salvage F1 2020, but to protect F1 2021.

          1. @alianora-la-canta, Your last sentence above shows that we agree as to what is the problem, you’re are just a little more conservative on how to implement a solution, I think we can both say E(i?)sport is not it.

          2. Alianora La Canta (@alianora-la-canta)
            4th May 2020, 0:47

            @HoHum eSports might have to be the solution – that part isn’t in our hands, nor any of motorsport’s powers-that-be. It’s just that Liberty and F1 cannot afford to break contract on races it can safely and practically complete. It all depends on how well COVID-19 can be controlled, as to whether there are options that involve people leaving their homes…

  3. Well there won’t be quarantine in the UK, that’s for sure. It will mean that the trip to Austria will have to be two weeks early if they have it. So two weeks quarantine will cover the first four races, that’s do-able.

  4. So all the crews etc. , possibly 1000 plus people arrive at the circuit and are all tested for virus. What happens if any of these test positive? Will it then be called off as in Australia. It must be a real risk and possibility.

    1. @feral good point. I’d say it’s almost an inevitability given the high number of asymptomatic carriers.

  5. Imagine being 18th and within 0.05s of pole. Or 30th and within a tenth. I know it’s because of the nature of the circuit and the short lap, but still.

Comments are closed.