Formula 1 has announced details of the progress it has made towards its aim of becoming a “net zero” producer of carbon emissions.
One year to the day since its green target was revealed, F1 said it has already made steps towards significantly reducing the carbon emissions produced by its global operation, despite the challenges presented by Covid-19. It also confirmed details of how it plans to overhaul its engine formula in the future.A new working group involving car manufacturers plus F1 and FIA personnel has been created to help formulate future engine regulations based around sustainably-fuelled hybrid technology. F1 believes this is the best way it can contribute towards developing greener technologies in a world where the vast majority of cars are still powered by internal combustion engines burning fossil fuels.
F1’s headline aim last year was to develop a net-zero hybrid power unit, using a sustainable fuel. The new working group will examine how the cars could be powered by cleaner energy sources.
“This group will be expanded to include specialists from the [original equipment manufacturers] and energy suppliers as well as seeking expertise from independent research groups,” said the series in a statement.
“Although the carbon footprint of the cars is a very small percentage of our carbon footprint as a sport (0.7%) it is important that the most visual part of our sport is sustainable and can have real-world benefits.”
The championship expects internal combustion engines will be part of a net-zero carbon future. “We believe that with over 1 billion of the 1.1 billion vehicles in the world powered by internal combustion engines, we have the potential to lead the way in technologies that reduce automotive carbon emissions globally.
“We also believe that there is not a single solution to the engine technologies of the future but that a sustainably fuel hybrid engine will be a significant moment for the sport and the automotive sector.”
During 2020 F1 has joined Formula E in achieving the FIA’s highest standard of environmental accreditation, the three star rating, along with McLaren and two Formula E teams, Mahindra and Virgin. It also signed up to the United Nations Sports for Climate Action Framework and switched its offices to run on electricity from renewable sources, one of the commitments it set out last year.
The global coronavirus pandemic pushed the championship to accelerate a two-year plan to make its broadcast operations more remote, completing the work in just eight weeks prior to the delayed start of the season. Making the change removed a reported 70 tonnes of freight from what has to be transported to each race and reduced the number of travelling staff by 36%.
F1 also intends to “significantly reduce the amount of single-use plastic bottles and cutlery and food waste in the pit and paddock”.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
2020 F1 season
- Pictures: Wrecked chassis from Grosjean’s Bahrain fireball crash to go on display
- Bottas vs Rosberg: Hamilton’s Mercedes team mates compared after 78 races each
- F1 revenues fell by $877 million in Covid-struck 2020 season
- Hamilton and Mercedes finally announce new deal for 2021 season
- F1 audience figures “strong” in 2020 despite dip in television viewers
nickthegreek (@nickthegreek)
12th November 2020, 9:22
but according to the comments section of Racefan internal combustion engines are dead and nobody uses them anymore? surely they no better than the Formula 1 engine manufacturers…
Barry Bens (@barryfromdownunder)
12th November 2020, 10:13
The specific use of the term ‘vehicles’ is obviosuly done to mark the undesired truth: the percentage non-combustion engine cars in first world countries (the countries that matter when it comes to ‘showing progressive tech’) is obviously higher than that of ‘all vehicles in the world’. You’re not going to have electric tractors or (majority) of trucks. Not to mention 99% of the cars used on the entire continent of Africa are old rustbuckets. Sure, you can say ‘but those are traditional combustion engine-cars’, but I doubt they give a single heck about going electric or ‘good for the environment tech’: they just want to go from A to B.
Electricity is the future of the automobile industry and F1 knows that very well. The fact they have to grasp at straws like using the term ‘worldwide vehicles’ makes that pretty obvious.
BasCB (@bascb)
12th November 2020, 13:35
@barryfromdownunder, I think that the part about “grasping at straws” is not quite correct there.
Apart from that, you give a good idea of how many billions of vehicles (scooters, motorcycles, rikshas, cars, delivery vans, large trucks, busses, off course trains, ships and even aeroplanes) are out there that won’t get (at least not fullly) replaced by electric vehicles anytime in the next 2 decades or probably even the next 4 decades or ever.
Even in the western world, unless all such vehicles are banned from being used, with an average age of about 10-12 years, it will take 2 decades before a majority of that vehicle park becomes EVs. In conglomerations electric will almost certainly become the standard, simply because the lack of pollutants from exhaust gasses. But for the longer haul transport?
So there is a real market for developing more sustainable fuels for the next 2 decades. And if they work well, and are really sustainable, they can become the go to solution for lang-haul transport including aeroplanes and ships (and trains), especially if they can be used in current engines with some adaptation or additives.
Tony Mansell (@tonymansell)
12th November 2020, 11:44
Yes this is the nearest we’ve had yet to f1 stating they will step away from the hated* hybrids. Fingers crossed.
*not everyone on here for sure
Robbie (@robbie)
12th November 2020, 14:12
@tonymansell Not sure what you mean. It sounds very much like their next pu will be hybrid, just hopefully/potentially fuelled by synthetics.
Adam
12th November 2020, 15:55
You are going to be disappointed. The next engines will be hybrid power units.
Tristan (@skipgamer)
12th November 2020, 12:12
Why not have your own opinion rather than argue against an argument that nobody has made?
Tony Mansell (@tonymansell)
12th November 2020, 13:50
What are you on about, this site is full of rabid hybrid lovers! All 9 of them never stop going on about the forefront of tech. Youre on here enough, I cant believe you haven’t noticed
petebaldwin (@)
12th November 2020, 15:55
I don’t think anyone loves the hybrids. They just don’t want to change a formula that provides consistent wins for the driver they support.
Rhys Lloyd (@justrhysism)
19th November 2020, 2:15
@petebaldwin I love the hybrids. I don’t care about sound. I love the technology. I love the fact that they are the most thermally efficient engines in the world.
Also not a LH fan, although I do respect him. As an Aussie I back Danny Ric.
Jere (@jerejj)
12th November 2020, 9:22
Hopefully, the (organization of the) race calendar would also reflect more on this in the long-term.
MEGATRON M12 (@megatron)
12th November 2020, 11:31
Get rid of the dry ice on the start grid. Get rid of the tire blankets that use massive electricity. Cut the number of tire sets used from 13 to 3 per car per weekend. Fuel the cars with biofuel made from ocean plastics.
Tristan (@skipgamer)
12th November 2020, 12:17
As they say the cars are .7% of the emissions, so it doesn’t really matter what technology they use.
This is great progress and should be championed, well done F1 👏 Hopefully the rest of the circus can be trimmed back a similar amount.
BasCB (@bascb)
12th November 2020, 13:37
Apart from the window dressing, it would be of use as a development platform for manufacturers and maybe even more so for the chemicals/oil industry to support IMO @skipgamer
Only once they power the aeroplanes and ships that transport the materials and the planes, busses and trains that ship the visitors with those more sustainable fuels, will it make a direct impact.
Tony Mansell (@tonymansell)
12th November 2020, 13:51
Can you comment on the 23 races and the number of jetting between continents in electric aeroplanes?
Tristan (@skipgamer)
12th November 2020, 18:41
Well electric aeroplane’s don’t exist so don’t be daft. They are making measurable changes in the right direction and that is a good thing.
nick---0 (@nick-0)
12th November 2020, 12:36
I’m fine with them switching to a bio fuel for the cars if they want. It’s a good symbolic step, but I hope they don’t make a big deal about it if it’s not something that could be scaled for other vehicles to use. Probably the world of biofuels has advanced since I last looked at it, but previously there was always some major draw back like it used too much arable land, or that it was too energy intensive, or was just not economically viable.
ruliemaulana (@ruliemaulana)
12th November 2020, 12:54
Ok. So, where’s the details of the progress F1 has made? Statement like ‘will examine how’, ‘will be expanded to include specialists’, and ‘seeking expertise from independent research groups’ is not a progress.
Robbie (@robbie)
12th November 2020, 14:06
@ruliemaulana Of course it is progress. This is about them setting themselves up for the next power unit for 2026, and defining what that will be. And it is about all the R&D that will ensue as they head towards their zero emissions goal, which can also spill over to the domestic ICE market.
ruliemaulana (@ruliemaulana)
13th November 2020, 3:49
It’s not remotely close to ‘the details of’.