Minutes before the start of qualifying for the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, Lewis Hamilton was under investigation for two separate incidents which occured during the third free practice session. One, for allegedly failing to respect double waved yellow flags; and the other, for allegedly impeding Nikita Mazepin.
But by the time qualifying ended, Hamilton had been cleared of one infringement and received a minor sanction for the other. Cue a sigh of relief for the world champion, who headed qualifying and will start the race from pole position.
Coming just two weeks after his championship rival Max Verstappen received a five-place grid penalty for ignoring double waved yellows in qualifying, how did Hamilton avoid a potentially race-losing penalty not once, but twice?
In the case of the alleged ignoring double waved yellow flags, it was a straightforward decision from the stewards, if an unusual case.
As Hamilton began a flying lap around 20 minutes into the session, a warning signal was briefly triggered ahead of him. According to the official decision published by the stewards. “The double yellow flag warning on the FIA Marshalling System was activated at light panel number six accidentally, for less than one second.” The signal was shown on the outside of turn eight.
But as the stewards noted, it was not shown to Hamilton. “As the on-board video of car 44 [Hamilton] clearly shows, there was no yellow flag displayed, no yellow lights were displayed to that driver and the yellow warning light was not visible on the driver’s steering wheel.”
This made the situation quite different to Verstappen’s incident in Qatar, where a marshal was seen waving yellow flags as the Red Bull driver passed. On that occasion Pierre Gasly’s car has come to a halt off the racing line, and Verstappen was one of two drivers penalised for failing to back off, the other being Valtteri Bottas.
“Unlike other incidents this year, there was no yellow flag or yellow light displayed to the driver (the driver already being well into the marshalling sector when the system was briefly activated) hence no breach of the regulations has occurred,” the stewards noted.
It was, effectively, a false alarm, and a brief one, as no vehicles were stranded on track when Hamilton and Verstappen were negotiating this portion of the circuit.
As Hamilton’s onboard showed, a signal was being displayed to him at light panel six, but it was a white flag indicating the slower car of Yuki Tsunoda ahead.
“With the yellow flags, there was a white panel going through turn nine, but there was no yellows,” explained Hamilton. “There wasn’t a car stopped anywhere.” Hamilton subsequently passed Verstappen on approach to turn 13, the lightly-banked hairpin at the far end of the circuit.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
While Hamilton was cleared over that infringement, he came much closer to getting in trouble over the incident involving Nikita Mazepin. Indeed, he was penalised, through the reprimand he received will not affect his starting position.
Mazepin was forced to take evasive action in the turn eight run-off as he approached Hamilton at full speed while Hamilton was on a cool-down lap. For that, Mercedes were fined €25,000, and Hamilton his second reprimand of the season, leaving him one away from triggering an automatic 10-place grid penalty.
Race engineer Peter Bonnington was informing Hamilton that both Mazepin and his Haas team mate Mick Schumacher were approaching him at full speed, just as the incident unfolded. A startled Hamilton exclaimed: “Fuck, Bono, you didn’t tell me, man – I had no idea [Mazepin] was coming.”
“With Nikita, I was told that he is 10 seconds behind starting a lap,” explained Hamilton. As the stewards’ assessment noted, that was the last warning he received until Mazepin caught him.
“It’s such a difficult track,” said Hamilton. “You have to get the feedback all the way down to when they’re four seconds behind or something like that, three seconds, so you know when to get out of the way. And there was radio silence, so I had no idea where he was. Next thing I know he’s right behind me.”
“Yesterday in the driver’s briefing, I did say that there was a potential for this,” Hamilton added. “So we should probably keep a minimum speed everywhere. Like they did for [turns] 22 [through] 27.”
Race director Michael Masi, in a radio conversation that was broadcast on the world feed, noted that “there was no flags of any form shown through that sector for Nikita or Lewis.”
The stewards viewed Hamilton’s situation sympathetically, noting: “Due to a failure in communication by the team he was not given another warning until car nine [Mazepin] was alongside him.”
Unusually, the stewards took the unusually fast and winding confines of the Jeddah circuit in mitigation when assessing the incident.
“The stewards accept that this circuit presents challenges for drivers in relation to using their mirrors as the method of determining the approach of overtaking cars,” they ruled.
“Although it is the driver’s ultimate responsibility to avoid impeding, for this circuit the driver must depend upon the team to communicate efficiently. This did not happen in this case and accordingly the penalty for the competitor is imposed.”
“The stewards take this opportunity to emphasise that due to the nature of this circuit it is essential that teams communicate effectively and proactively with their drivers,” the stewarded added. “This is not to be taken as a precedent for other circuits.”
In this instance, the stewards felt more responsibility lay with the team than with the driver. Hamilton may very well have been fortunate to have only received a reprimand for running slowly on the racing line and forcing a driver to take evasive action, on an ultra-high speed circuit littered with blind corners.
Because the decision on the incident between Hamilton and Mazepin was issued after the start of qualifying, and new video was issued at the time, the FIA gave any teams considering an appeal an extra 30 minutes to do so. However Mercedes’ title rivals Red Bull chose not to take advantage of the opportunity.
Some may take the stance that the stewards were not willing to risk having the championship battle being influenced by a grid penalty. However Red Bull’s unwillingness to protest the decision indicates they were ultimately satisfied by it. Similar leniency was shown in qualifying, where Pierre Gasly was giving a warning for impeding Carlos Sainz Jnr, albeit at lower speeds and with neither driver on a fast lap.
However the officials laid down a marker for the grand prix in their verdict: “The stewards take this opportunity to stress to ALL TEAMS that due to the nature of this circuit, it is essential that efficient and timely radio communications be made to their drivers about cars that may be overtaking during the race (in the case of lapped cars).”
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
2021 Saudi Arabian Grand Prix
- Analysis: Is Jeddah circuit’s layout fit for F1 or a “recipe for disaster”?
- Hamilton closes on another Schumacher record with first ‘hat-trick’ of 2021
- How Hamilton and Verstappen’s roughest scrap yet played out on the radio
- Brawn defends Masi following criticism of Saudi Arabian GP decisions
- F1 drivers want safety changes to Jeddah’s “Suzuka with walls” layout
21 comments on “Why pole-winner Hamilton was twice spared a grid penalty blow in Jeddah”
5th December 2021, 9:03
Solid explainer, thanks. Yeah the timing of it made it a bit hard to know exactly what happened, especially with the waves yellow infringement (which then apparently be definition wasn’t an infringement).
I do think that Hamilton was a bit lucky the stewards felt they wanted to put pressure on his, and other, teams to make sure to tell drivers about what other cars are around. Especially given he himself (as did others) already saw the issue going in.
I also think FIA has some culpability because they approved this track, which clearly makes this problem worse than maybe it had to be. Perhaps for the next tracks (like the street track in Qatar, and/or the apparently under planning new track to replace this one), they can think about issues like this pro-actively?
5th December 2021, 9:55
Still a very strange story.
There were visible two moments of yellow. Not for a “second” and hard to see.
5th December 2021, 10:02
they are white flags
5th December 2021, 10:06
Indeed. It’s almost as if erikje didn’t bother reading the article or even watching his own video closely.
5th December 2021, 10:11
Interesting then, never saw a double white. They do not exist.
5th December 2021, 11:19
That’s not a “double white”. “double” does not mean two at two separate marshalling posts. It means two flags waved simultaneously at the same post. A white flag means slow car ahead.
5th December 2021, 13:54
Erik once again exposing his lack of knowledge.
These fans who only turned on in 2015…
5th December 2021, 12:54
You’re not covering yourself in glory here, erikje.
ferrox glideh (@ferrox-glideh)
5th December 2021, 13:17
@slightlycrusty erikje has recently admitted on this site that they are here to provoke “hamfans” and have a laugh at their expense, so I wouldn’t take anything they say very seriously, especially when Hamilton is concerned.
5th December 2021, 13:28
Thanks @ferrox-glideh, I notice from the responses they’ve got that no-one was particularly provoked.
5th December 2021, 10:24
If after that explainer, you still find the decision strange, you’ve got orange wool pulled over your eyes, or you need to read it again.
5th December 2021, 10:51
Read the article! You’ve also got a problem with colour identification. The second was a white. I couldn’t see the first at all so will refrain from commenting on that one.
Also, dont double waved flags come from same Marshall post?
5th December 2021, 11:14
Yes, “Double Yellow” means two yellow flags being waved simultaneously at the same marshalling post. Not yellows at two separate marshalling posts.
Also, as you say, those flags are white not yellow. According to the article, no yellow flags were waved at any point.
5th December 2021, 10:26
Given he nearly caused two crashes and didn’t spot waved yellows, he’s been very lucky this weekend. His championship rival crashing on the final corner was just the icing on the cake.
5th December 2021, 11:02
@joshgeake the near misses were a stroke of luck. The “yellows” weren’t there to spot, just a computer glitch triggering an investigation, no luck involved there.
5th December 2021, 11:17
Did you even read the article? There were no waved yellow flags. There’s a video floating about, but that shows waved white flags (slow car ahead).
5th December 2021, 11:21
There were no “waved yellows”, read the article.
David BR (@david-br)
5th December 2021, 12:07
So it wasn’t entirely scot-free. Watch this space…
5th December 2021, 12:43
Again. Read the article. The team was penalized! The marshal felt that lack of communication was to blame. In order to fine the team 25 grands they have to get through the driver, hence the reprimand. Why the heck are we arguing with Maxholes anyway? :)
5th December 2021, 13:22
The article has “unusual” or a variant of it 3 times and “sympathetic” once which in my mind reads, Stewards want to keep the championship fight intact until the end. A reprimand is a lucky sanction and probably won’t amount to anything in the little that is left. Hamilton was indeed “lucky@,
6th December 2021, 7:28
Indeed, earlier in the season and there would have been a penalty. The stewards have done a wonderful job of manufacturing a close title fight.
Comments are closed.