The minimum weight limit for cars built to new technical regulations for the 2022 Formula 1 season has increased again.
The minimum weight limit for cars built to F1’s incoming new rules has been repeatedly increased. The new rules were originally slated for introduction this year with the minimum weight limit set at 775kg. A further 20kg has been added since then.
Next year’s cars will be 43kg heavier than their predecessors. This will be F1’s largest year-on-year weight rise since the V6 hybrid turbo power units were introduced in 2014, when weights rose by 48kg. A separate minimum weight of 150kg is defined for power units, including at least 7kg for the MGU-K and 4kg for the MGU-H.
The new cars for 2022 are being built to extensively changed technical regulations. They include a change from 13-inch to 18-inch wheels which has added to the weight at each corner of the car.
Formula 1’s motorsport director Ross Brawn previously indicated they may reduce the external dimensions of cars in the next major rules change, due in 2026, but not necessarily a reduction in the minimum weight limit.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
F1’s minimum weight limit, 1961 – 2022
NB. Separate minimum weight limits were enforced for turbocharged and normally-aspirated cars in 1987 and 1988.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
2022 F1 season
- Steiner “not ashamed” of panning “slow” Schumacher in Drive to Survive
- Albon believes year out of F1 improved him as a driver
- Hamilton sees diversity gains in F1 years on from his ‘traumatising’ experience of racism
- Verstappen returns to Drive to Survive as season five launch date is confirmed
- Why first Alonso and now Williams backed young Argentinian racer Franco Colapinto
55 comments on “FIA increases minimum weight of new F1 cars for 2022 again”
21st December 2021, 12:15
How much slower?
21st December 2021, 13:52
Approximately 25 milliseconds per kg
22nd December 2021, 14:52
According to some simulations I made a while ago, 1% increase in weight is about 0.2% increase in laptime in Monza (the figure depends on the circuit and engine power). For 2022 the minimum weight increase is 5.7% (with no fuel), so 79 seconds of laptime should go up to about 79.90 (again, with no fuel – ie: Qualy).
Just for comparison, for the same sim, a 1% decrease in power has an impact of about +0.06% in laptime in Monza, so weight increase more than triples laptime increase caused by power loss, by the same (small) relative amount.
22nd December 2021, 14:58
That doesn’t take into account the cars new aerodynamics or 18inch tyres so is pointless.
21st December 2021, 12:23
I find the minimum weight for individual components a lot more troublesome than the overall minimum weight. I really prefer ‘overall’ regulations over component regulations in general. The restrictive nature is stifling the innovation that makes the technical aspect of Formula One so interesting. Ideally Formula One cars should need to pass safety and structural integrity tests, adhere to maximum dimensions, possibly a ban on electronic driver aids, and that’s it for me.
22nd December 2021, 10:57
The problem with not mandating sensible minimum weights is it leads to spending a huge amount of money chasing negligible weight savings.
Rhys Lloyd (@justrhysism)
22nd December 2021, 21:11
@optimaximal it certainly used to, but there’s a cost cap now, yeah?
24th December 2021, 13:34
@justrhysism The cost cap doesn’t apply to engines.
Jim from US (@jimfromus)
21st December 2021, 12:30
And this increases fuel efficiency and decreases carbon footprint?
Jay Menon (@jaymenon10)
22nd December 2021, 0:41
That math is too complicated for us mere mortals. Please dont hurt yourself.
22nd December 2021, 14:59
No as the cars have a maximum amount of fuel the can use during a race, it’s been like that for many years now.
Luke S (@joeypropane)
21st December 2021, 12:56
Surely this is just counter-productive? Heavier cars will generate more force when crashing, so will need to be reinforced more, adding more weight, no?
I’m struggling to figure out where all this weight is even going – the wheels will be heavier, obviously, but the simpler aero shouldn’t be an issue? Is it all extra batteries and hybrid tech??
21st December 2021, 13:04
There is no change to batteries or hybrid tech in 2022, this is an unnecessary change initiated by back marker who claim that the cost cap is making it difficult to use more exotic/expensive/lighter materials.
22nd December 2021, 10:48
You say backmarker but RF article in September reporting the minimum weight increase request says it’s an agreement by all teams.
21st December 2021, 13:46
Even F1 cars put on a bit of weight over Christmas
31st December 2021, 15:50
21st December 2021, 13:54
In 2021 the FIA used to call it weight but in 2022 it is now mass.
In ordinary conversation they might be interchangeable in scientific terms they are different.
21st December 2021, 14:11
Scientifically, it has always been a mass limit: It’s specified in kg, which is a unit of mass. They have just used the everyday English term “weight” in place of mass in the past. Maybe they just decided they should get the terminology correct if they are producing technical specifications.
21st December 2021, 15:33
Then maybe they should start using international units too, instead of PSI, Mile, etc.
21st December 2021, 14:07
(I’ll say it again) With the budget cap and separate driver minimum weight there is no need whatsoever to have a minimum car weight.
21st December 2021, 14:58
Yeah I agree – set the “driver + seat” minimum weight at something that is easily achievable for drivers of all sizes and then let the teams try and shed weight on the rest of the car however they can. If one team wants to invest heavily in weight reduction whilst another team wants to focus mainly on aero, you’ll have interesting variances between the teams. Instead of one team winning every race, they’ll struggle on some tracks but will dominate on others.
21st December 2021, 15:36
And that is one of the reasons F1 is getting more and more boring every year.
21st December 2021, 22:51
If you thought last season was boring, you might consider finding another sport to watch.
21st December 2021, 23:36
As far as competition between drivers you mean? Maybe. But F1 is using cars that aren’t fit for racing actually, which is proven by the use of DRS and the rule changes to make the cars less sensitive to loss of downforce when behind one another. Not that it will do much good as DRS is there to stay. There’s actually a lot of spec classes that provide much better racing. Plus the FIA etc. manages to make F1 more and more about politics and ‘the show’, which is not my cup of tea.
Then, as far as competition between constructors, the FIA is deliberately heading towards less and less room for clever inventions. And when – FIA forbid- they do come up with something, it’s promptly forbidden.
So that going towards a spec class with cars that can’t race. And…. those minimum weights?! That’s become utterly ridiculous. I’ve owned and raced road legal sportscars that weigh less. (Around 570 and 740 kg, to be more precise.)
It’s no longer what F1 should be about, certainly not what it used to be and less and less what attracted me in the first place, nearly 50 years ago.
Oh, and what I consider to watch or not is entirely up to me, and no one else, thank you.
If all of us who do not agree with your opinion would heed your advice, you’d have nothing and noone left to talk to, talk about or discuss anymore.
22nd December 2021, 10:58
Except when all teams have that opinion it kinda moots your point. Especially since all teams are still financially responsible for their own damages even when it’s not their fault and those materials will not be easy to replace. Pre-budget cap they probably wouldn’t care as much on this, at least you wouldn’t have the consensus they have now to actually *ask* for a minimum weight increase which caused this latest one.
The teams all asking for it also signals that even the light material focused teams think it’s a challenge and not just the technically weaker backbenchers.
22nd December 2021, 15:02
Money saving. Richer teams might start using ballast planks next year like 20 years ago.
Richard C (@rich156)
22nd December 2021, 12:15
Such a rule would need to be very carefully worded as a bright designer would insist on a driver, of microbe proportions, sitting on a very dense slab of material that lowered the centre of gravity significantly over that of a tall driver. You would still have drivers such as Mark Webber, Nico Hulkenberg, etc having to diet dangerously to skeletal form to meet the driver + seat combinations to be competitive where microbes like Vettel or Alonso could strategically place 20-40kg of weight on the chassis floor to get better handling.
22nd December 2021, 15:45
Then add to the rule that there’s a virtual cage of minimal proportions that should alway fit, and, driver included, determine where it’s CoG should be?
Phew, that was hard thinking.
What is it with you guys that it’s always easier for you to come up with problems than with solutions?
22nd December 2021, 10:49
Except the teama all asked for it.
21st December 2021, 14:18
What’s behind the increase in weight?
21st December 2021, 14:41
It’s a mix of things, but it’s mainly due to the hybrid power units and certain safety improvements. Harmonising driver weight is another issue as is the use of heavier materials under the cost cap.
21st December 2021, 14:51
Why is making up minds unnecessarily hard? Could someone enlighten me?
Originally 768 kg (pre-2019 US GP when the upcoming car concept was scheduled for this year’s campaign).
That should’ve already been enough, but no, first to 775, followed by 790 when even that wasn’t enough for some, & 792 before this (hopefully) final one, so four separate alterations from the original figure.
I don’t know how to feel anymore about this ridiculous indecisiveness.
22nd December 2021, 10:50
FIA were fine with 790 but the teams all asked for more.
23rd December 2021, 9:02
@yaru Yes. 790 was already 15 up from the previous one, so that should’ve been enough for all teams.
790 versus 792, or 792 v 795, shouldn’t make a difference as they’re close to each other, weird stuff.
Armchair Expert (@armchairexpert)
21st December 2021, 15:23
Since 2009 they’ve added 5.7-6.65s of laptime in weight increase. Truly the pinnacle of motorsport.
22nd December 2021, 10:51
Yet WRs were broken a lot in 2019 to the point where they had to mandate downforce reduction for safety reasons.
23rd December 2021, 9:04
@yaru That was last year.
21st December 2021, 15:41
A quick search on the internet gave me the top 10 best brands in this weight class as being:
Leopard, Abrams, Armata, Challenger, Black Panther, Merkava, TK-X, Leclerc (!), T-90MS, VT4
23rd December 2021, 9:06
Now there is a race I would watch..
..on tv, from my home, far away from the action…
21st December 2021, 15:53
Man, an Indy car weighs 714 kg without the driver……..
22nd December 2021, 15:21
But it has less power and about 5% of F1 budget and stricter and simpler aerodynamics., Yet it arguably produces better racing. Weight is not an issue. Even if F1 cars weigh 900kg, they are still likely to be the fastest race car, as it can afford more expensive aero setups and development, better brakes, Rich manufacturer developed power units. Weight of the cars is a non issue to me, more important is to get closer racing and passing without aids like drs. Heavy saloon cars can provide better racing than light weight open wheeler cars
The Edge (@the-edge)
21st December 2021, 20:39
As long as the cars are deemed safe I dot understand why the keep increasing the minimum weight
After all, it’s not a maximum weight.. cars are allowed to be heavier if teams can’t hit the minimum target
All this does is reduces yet another avenue of performance gain
22nd December 2021, 10:51
It’s explained here. The teams asked for it.
23rd December 2021, 9:39
I’d say his question is a legitimate one. I don’t feel it is explained there at all. The article features a td complaining they can’t seem to reach the minimum weight. Well, then be above it. Which is absolutely fine. With the budget cap a team must consider where to spend the money. If one team can make a lighter car than the others at the expense of lacking development somewhere else on the car, that’s fine by me.
Dear teachers, it’s too hard to score A+ on every test. Could you please lower the benchmark for everyone?
No, get a B, it’s fine. If someone want’s to study for an A+ on this subject and therefore doesn’t have enough time to study for the other subject and get a C there, that’s also fine.
21st December 2021, 21:10
mercedes havent spend their development token on this years car,next year they will be the top dogs.
Jay Menon (@jaymenon10)
22nd December 2021, 0:45
22nd December 2021, 10:05
Minimum weight rules, except driver, now that there is a budget cap is illogical and against the essence of the sport.
22nd December 2021, 14:54
I loved watching the late 90s/early 2000s 800kg CART champcara with 900hp. F1 will be a bit like that next year but with 25years ahead technology. Should be fun, hopefully lots of overtaking like in those Indycar years
22nd December 2021, 16:34
Why don’t they listen to the drivers and fans? We need lighter and smaller cars die overtaking. How hard van it be, FIA?
22nd December 2021, 16:35
Die = for overtaking.
This site needs an edit button!
22nd December 2021, 17:45
“We need lighter and smaller cars for overtaking overtaking”??
22nd December 2021, 17:54
You’re wrong. Lighter cars mean shorter braking distances, which dicreases the room for overtaking.
Also, lighter cars mean faster cornering, therefore less braking – again, less room for overtaking.
People driven by nostalgia conflate and project their dislike for some characteristics of current F1 cars onto other unrelated characteristics (i.e. “F1 cars used to be light and sound great, today they are heavy and sound badly, therefore I hate them being heavy”.), and so hate on the heavier cars, but those are actually better for the sport.
23rd December 2021, 8:52
Fair enough. But I’ll think lighter and smaller cars with ground effect and way less aerodynamics are better for overtaking than big heavy cars. Because the tires wouldn’t overheat so fast. And lap times would still be great. Maybe i’m just a purist on performance. It’s the pinnacle of motorsport.
23rd December 2021, 9:15
If it is overtaking that you want: they could make them narrow, that would give more racing lines. Extremely narrow. And remove 2 wheels. Remove braking capacity so the braking zone is 6 times longer. The result is lots of overtaking but I feel we end up with a series that already exists ;-)
22nd December 2021, 21:05
Want to increase overtaking and save money? Mandate ferrous metal brakes…….
Comments are closed.