No satisfaction in McLaren being quickest Mercedes-powered team at Imola – Seidl

2022 F1 season

Posted on

| Written by

McLaren team principal Andreas Seidl says he isn’t taking any satisfaction from his team leading the eight Mercedes-powered cars in last weekend’s Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix.

Following a tough start to their 2022 campaign, McLaren have steadily improved and scored a breakthrough podium finish at Imola. Lando Norris took third place ahead of Mercedes driver George Russell.

However Seidl said the team has to set its sights higher than leading the Mercedes-powered pack.

“I don’t take any pleasure by being, for a single weekend, in front of Mercedes,” he said. “Our aim when we wake up in the morning is to win races.

“We know we are not in a position to do that at the moment because we are not there yet in our journey of getting everything in place that we need in order to fight regularly for race wins. But that’s what we are focussed on.”

McLaren’s priority, says Seidl, remains building up its resources to become regular contenders for victory again.

“We need to close the gap in the next years on the infrastructure side compared to the teams that are running in front of us,” Seidl said. “We need to close the gap in terms of levelling up the experience also within the team after we did all the changes, ultimately, in order to close the gap in terms of lap time performance, and that’s what we’re focussed on.”

Norris took the chequered flag in Imola seven seconds ahead of Russell. However, Mercedes believe they might have been able to beat McLaren to the final podium place had they been able to successfully change Russell’s front wing setting at his pit stop.

“Given the difficulties we had in qualifying, given the fact that [Russell] finished the sprint race where he started, it was certainly a good effort on Sunday to bring the car home in fourth,” said the Mercedes’ head of trackside engineering Andrew Shovlin.

“We also had that issue with the front wing adjuster that meant he had the wrong balance. He was effectively driving a wet car balance in the dry. So, there is no doubt that was costing him performance.

“We are very pleased with the fourth place that he was able to achieve. Who knows what he could have done if he’d had the right car balance in that final stint? But he also did a great job to keep Valtteri [Bottas] behind.”

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2022 F1 season

Browse all 2022 F1 season articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

6 comments on “No satisfaction in McLaren being quickest Mercedes-powered team at Imola – Seidl”

  1. Yeah sure… totally Believable…

  2. If in competitive sport (and top-tier, mind you) there’s no satisfaction in being better than your competitor, then where can such satisfaction ever be found? There’s politics in everything, but don’t overplay it, it’s ridiculous how coy you can all be.

    1. then where can such satisfaction ever be found?

      In maximising (or optimising) your own performance.
      Even when you win, there are still areas you can work on to improve.

    2. I believe him, mclaren is after all a championship winning team, I started watching in the schumacher era, in 1999, so mclaren was slightly the best car back then and they still have those ambitions, and obviously they want to be able to compete with ferrari\red bull, being ahead of their supplier isn’t enough, they want to make the last step to really be in the mix, there’s been times where they were really close last year in quali\race.

    3. McLaren want to be World Champions. Having one car finish ahead of both Mercedes is good for a moral boost, but it isn’t enough. Both cars need to be finishing ahead of Mercedes.

  3. I wonder if they understand how they have achieved what still seems illusive to the Mercedes.

    Did they just ‘luck’ into a more successful aero package? Do have they carried forward a previous working knowledge of these ground effect designs, which they’ve updated. Or is the fault really on Mercedes and their ‘divergent’ aero design philosophy.

    In theory Mercedes still has the better engine and the better cooling solution.

Comments are closed.