De Vries’ F1 chance shows Drugovich needs to be ‘patient’ after F2 title win

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: Formula 2 champion Felipe Drugovich is told he should draw encouragement from the example of his 2019 predecessor Nyck de Vries, who will become a full-time Formula 1 driver with AlphaTauri next year.

In brief

Drugovich has patience needed to reach F1 – Krack

Drugovich won the F2 title last month with three races to spare and was later confirmed as Aston Martin’s junior driver. The team’s principal Mike Krack said the team were impressed by the maturity he showed in his title campaign and believes that, with patience, he can earn an F1 chance like De Vries did.

“One thing you always have when you look at drivers is that very often if they are not winning F2 in the first year or F3 in the first year, they quickly get to be drawn into ‘second best’ [drawer], which I think especially in the case of Nyck is not a fair judgement.

“We looked at Felipe, we were quite impressed by the maturity of his racing. He was not hot-headed in many, many races, brought it home and was one of the few not affiliated to a junior programme, to an academy. They went their own way and this is quite impressive.”

The previous seven drivers’ champions in F2 (formerly GP2) drove for powerhouse F2 teams Prema and ART. Drugovich won his title with MP Motorsport.

“To even choose, maybe not one of the famous teams for his third year, I think shows the kind of self-confidence they were having,” said Krack. “And they brought it home and for us that was very impressive.

“So, I think Felipe and his environment are very professional, they have a very good understanding of the scene, and they will have the required patience for Felipe to get into F1.”

Every inch matters in midfield fight – Zhou

Zhou Guanyu said the Japanese Grand Prix was a difficult weekend for Alfa Romeo as the team failed to score for the eighth time in the last nine races.

“Overall this weekend after trying the new package and new front wing it’s looking positive, but we need a little bit more time to understand exactly,” he explained. “But overall I think it’s not an been easy weekend. It’s so close in the midfield battle, every little inch matters here.”

Zhou, who was racing at Suzuka for the first time last weekend, said he “learned a lot” from his debut at the track.

IndyCar swaps Florida test venue for California

IndyCar’s first pre-season test of 2023 will take place at The Thermal Club near Palm Springs in California. The series has previously run at Sebring in Florida.

President Jay Frye described the circuit, frequently used by club racers and sports car drivers, as “a new and unique backdrop” for the series and a “spectacular” facility. The drivers will use the venue’s North Palm and South Palm circuits combined to create a 17-turn, 4.6-kilometre circuit.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

As Red Bull’s cost cap violation could have been by as much as $7.25 million, should the FIA have given a more precise indication of the scale of their transgression?

I am amazed the figure has not been provided. Give me an estimate to the nearest million, round down to the nearest million if need be, but are we talking like $20,000 or $7 million overspend? There is surely no way they can try and justify a penalty, whether harsh or lenient, without giving an indication of the overspend.
Sam

Happy birthday!

No RaceFans birthdays today

On this day in motorsport

  • 30 years ago today Luca Badoer clinched the Formula 3000 championship by winning the penultimate round at Nogaro in France

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

20 comments on “De Vries’ F1 chance shows Drugovich needs to be ‘patient’ after F2 title win”

  1. I agree with @willwood there. The FIA should get their communications together. Why not “decline comment” on speculations? Why not announce the penalty for AM and RBR immediately?

    All this leads to is team managers with time to spin the story their way, articles full of speculation and comment sections filled with nonsense and hatred.

    1. I think they said exactly the right thing, so as to discourage further unsubstantiated rumours to be spread from within F1.

      Regardless of what they say, though, nasty people will always make things up to discredit others.

      1. Well, it’s a bit of egg-on-face when you’re first very fierce about singling out specific teams only to reveal a week later that the press was right. Why not “decline to comment” or “can confirm nor deny” instead.

        Regardless of what they say, though, nasty people will always make things up to discredit others.

        Sadly true.

      2. I assume that was a typo and you meant “encouraged”, since that’s what happened. There were many more rumours after the FIA attempted to claim the rumours were false than beforehand, due to the FIA’s lack of credibility.

        1. If that’s your assumption, your assumptions are discouraged.
          Thank you for providing a soft example of my final sentence, though.

          All the FIA were doing is asking everyone to stop talking in a negative manner about F1 until some facts have been presented. Surely that’s justifiable in their position, isn’t it?

    2. The FIA cannot “immediately” announce penalties because there is a process they must go through to determine what they will be, and it is first dependent on RBR and AM responses to the non-compliances. It’s described in detail here –

        1. Can’t get the link to work. It’s a Jonathon Noble/ Autosport article dated 11 October.

          1. The effort is appreciated!
            I see that there is/should be a process to be followed, but having a suggested penalty included in the verdict to which teams can protest would be better in my opinion.

          2. It’s a pity normal links to other sites don’t work.
            maybe it works like this: https://bit.ly/3Td5uXi

      1. @pault That makes the whole thing even more suspect than I thought, because it would be easy to conveniently change whether there was a breach, or the nature of that breach, in response to what the team responses said.

        Team responses belong to after judgment is rendered, not before.

    3. I think the FIA’s statement re: rumours and the like stem from the likes of Wolff fomenting trouble by claiming that “it’s an open secret that one team is massively over the budget cap”.

      The fact that the rumours about which teams were over the cap turned out to be true does not change the context of the FIA’s reaction to strongly worded statements by people who legally could not be in possession of all the facts. To be clear I’m not trying to say this was all Wolff’s doing, but his willingness to be soundbite guy does make it easier to use him as an example.

      I can’t believe I’m defending the FIA, what a bizarre year this is!

  2. someone or something
    11th October 2022, 2:24

    Rokit leaving behind a trail of unpaid bills and hungover business partners feeling defrauded? Who could’ve possibly seen it coming?
    As it turns out, pretty much everyone. I mean, if I can say “I told you so“, that’s not a very high bar.

    And, in contrast to my largely gut-feeling based cynism, William Jones did an excellent job of putting some flesh on the “money laundering” bone.
    Add to that the fact that the whole episode was rife with oddities. Jonathan Kendrick boasting that he used to be a ‘tyre engineer’ for Alan Jones – at a time when, mathematically speaking, he must’ve been no older than 20 – which absolutely no one could remember, but everyone at Williams seemed to just shrug it off and roll with it? The whole story about Claire Williams claiming in apparent earnest that putting a bottle of brown sauce on the meeting table may have tipped the scales in favour of the sponsorship deal?

    Those were never, of course, obvious red flags. Double-waved yellows, more like. Be extremely cautious and be ready to stop at any time. Still, I wonder how that many people could so oblivious to what a scam looks, tastes, feels, and especially sounds like. Did no one follow F1 in the Nineties?
    The comment section in the “brown sauce” article is an interesting excavation site for F1 fan sociology (I was going to say “gold mine”, but nah). The majority seemed to welcome the deal and express positive sentiments and wishes for Williams’ future. So far, so unspectacular.
    A minority, including myself, could not help but comment that something smelled oh so fishy.
    And a third group thought it fitting to attack the second group, occasionally personally and ferociously, for daring to insinuate that Rokit may be nothing but hot air and bad news (well, now we know how that turned out).

    I’m not sure what my point is here. There may be several. One of them might be the fact that the second and third group would probably no longer be a minority on this site, but comprise 90% of the comment section and be even nastier to each other. But I think what impressed me the most back then was the collective lack of scepticism of vast groups of F1 fans who could be thrown of the scent of something that looks, swims and quacks like a duck if it carried a sign saying “Ceci n’est pas un canard” (if they additionally knew any French, that is).

    1. @someone or something At the time, Williams was desperate for money. Jordan encountered at least one major scam (Gametrac) in its attempts to keep itself afloat in 2003-2003. The difference is that in Williams’ case, it worked long enough to find itself a buyer (and the fact Williams could maintain confidence and not upset its sponsors unduly – paying or otherwise – likely helped in securing one).

  3. Re: COTD & Will Wood tweet
    This makes me wonder how big the chance that this cost cap saga is just a ploy to drive engagement so F1 still on the news even after they have WDC a bit too early.

    1. Not everything is a nefarious plot.

      Sometimes things just happen because the process is followed and have results at some point in time.

    2. @ruliemaulana Not a very effective ploy if so – little use in being in the news cycle if it puts people off the series when they notice it.

      1. @alianora-la-canta maybe it just an Austin build-up show. There’s still a chance that Red Bull only get a fine.

        1. @ruliemaulana Still underlines my point that F1 would have been better off avoiding the cost cap saga altogether by not dragging it out and ruling on it in a manner consistent with the evidence thus far presented.

  4. The sad thing is that the polarisation between the Max and Lewis fans is back after it faded slowly this year. The Japanese audience showed us how F1 should be with a great atmosphere and respect to all fans.

Comments are closed.