Schumacher confident of return to F1 grid after “interest” in off-season

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: Mercedes reserve driver Mick Schumacher is confident he will have an opportunity to race in Formula 1 in the future.

In brief

Schumacher confident of return to F1 grid after “interest” in off-season

Schumacher lost his drive with Haas after two seasons with the team in favour of Nico Hulkenberg, and hoined Mercedes as reserve driver. However, he says he has already received “interest” about his future from other teams.

“There’s obviously no guarantee, but I’m in a comfortable position right now where I feel like I can learn, I can extract the maximum out of this year – even though I’m not driving,” Schumacher told media including RaceFans at the team’s launch this week.

“I’m sure that with the results I’ve shown in junior categories, but also in F1, I’m sure that there will be opportunities. Over the winter, a few people have already mentioned that there’s interest. So in one sense, I’m not too worried.”

Maini quickest on final day of F2 test

Campos driver Kush Maini set the fastest time on the third and final day of the pre-season F2 test in Bahrain, ahead of veteran Roy Nissany.

Maini’s best time of a 1’42.623 was almost three tenths faster than Nissany’s, but not quick enough to beat the overall fastest time of the test set by Richard Verschoor at the end of the second day.

The Formula 2 championship begins during the weekend of the Bahrain Grand Prix on Saturday March 4th.

IndyCar Detroit GP to offer free viewing areas

Detroit Grand Prix track rendering
Detroit Grand Prix track rendering

The first of IndyCar’s new-look Detroit Grand Prix will have free viewing areas around half of the circuit, organisers say.

The race, which is moving from Bell Isle to a new street circuit in downtown Detroit from this year, will allow fans to watch from standing areas trackside free of charge.

“Our mission statement is to give back to the Detroit community in different ways,” said Detroit Grand Prix president Michael Montri. “We are excited to welcome the entire community to our re-imagined and inclusive event.”

The Detroit Grand Prix will be held on Sunday 4th June, the weekend following the Indianapolis 500.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

With so many cars on the 2023 grid with little in the way of paint to reduce weight, reader Robert isn’t so keen…

Personally I think it’s sad that it has come to this, where the cars have so much bare carbon on them. The carbon-look in itself isn’t as cool as it was 15 years ago so I don’t see any reason to go for it other than necessity for weight savings. Mercedes can try to talk up their look as much as they want, but I think they must be truly desperate. They don’t have a livery this year, only some sponsor stickers.

If enough people, and perhaps more importantly the right people, shout out that they want to see more color on the grid eventually they will put it in the rules. Something like minimum 65% of visible bodywork area must be painted or wrapped. They already do CAD-checks for some stuff so that should be relatively easy to implement. You could still run a black livery if you wanted to, it would just have to be painted black. Or even carbon-looking vinyl on top of the carbon itself… if you truly desire that look. But if forced to cover up the structural material, I bet all teams would boast their true colors and nobody would ever doubt who is who in the pictures.
Robert

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Steve_P83, Mister Nillionaire and Roodda!

On this day in motorsport

  • 25 years ago today Arrows gave its A19 chassis an official launch, though the car had already run in testing

Author information

Will Wood
Will has been a RaceFans contributor since 2012 during which time he has covered F1 test sessions, launch events and interviewed drivers. He mainly...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

22 comments on “Schumacher confident of return to F1 grid after “interest” in off-season”

  1. The amount of comments about the look of the cars, their colours or lack thereof, is a true example of bikeshedding. Let’s move past this, especially the talk about enforcing painted surfaces.

    1. It’s not that long ago that rear wing end plates in F1 were enlarged solely to make more space for increased visibility. All cars were also mandated to have a large vertical plane on their rear bodywork for increased visibility.
      A significant factor in the design of the current car was to also maximise space for increased visibility.
      Amending technical rules for audience and sponsor benefit is not a new concept.
      Now teams no longer have to worry about keeping lots of sponsors visible on their cars, they’ve just about stopped painting them. Perhaps F1 is paying them too much….

      If you think that’s the right way for F1 to go, then that’s your thing – but most people don’t. 1 additional rule with no downsides would not be worth protesting against.
      When Crofty is continuously tripping over himself trying to figure out which car is which and taking 3 or 4 goes before he finally gets the right team (but still the wrong driver), I’ll be more than happy to remind everyone that the cars should be painted properly as they are designed to be put on TV.
      F1 is entertainment made for an audience.

      1. but most people don’t

        I’d like to see some data to back up this claim.

        1. The amount of comments about the look of the cars, their colours or lack thereof…

          I think you have part of the answer in what you said yourself.

          1. I view them as a vocal minority. Looking at comments sections of the car launch articles it’s the same group complaining about the lack of colour. Those who don’t mind the trend are not complaining nor are they likely to post about how great it is because it’s irrelevant.

    2. I’ve never heard of ‘bikeshedding’. What on earth does this mean. Can’t we use proper English?

      1. See….Brexiters!

    3. Just one more rule in a book already too thick. What’s next? Extreme weight chasing is the result of rules that forced the cars in the overweight zone. Do we really need new rules to counter the effect of the old ones?

    4. For me the “issue”, if we can call it that, of lack of paint is similar to that of driver weight. There is now a rule for the driver and seat to be a minimum combined weight. I think that is a positive, because without that rule the larger drivers would have been forced away from the sport due to the performance benefit in having a smaller driver. Many great talents would have been unable to ever get into F1 because their genes simply made them tall. I don’t want that, and I think many would agree. In fact, enough people did agree to make it a rule.
      A similar problem have now arisen regarding paint. The extreme competitiveness in F1 have led the teams to even remove a few grams of paint to gain performance. Once they have started, they will never stop, only go to even further extremes. This means that even if they wanted to paint their cars, they can’t because that would give them the same type of disadvantage as having a larger driver did before. Do we really want that? Color doesn’t make a car go faster, or race better. But people like colors, that’s why very few people have all their walls and furniture at home in plain grey.
      Ideally, I would love to see a completely revamped rule book with far fewer rules. A set of safety standards, a few key performance limiting factors, and then let everything else free under a budget cap. But that will never happen. So at this point, the best solution I can see is to regulate this are too. Before it gets completely out of hand. The paint-stripping trend has been ongoing for some years now, and it’s only going in one direction. It will never turn on its own.

    5. Nice attitude to label many people’s opinions as bikeshedding just because you don’t agree.

  2. I can’t see him realistically becoming a full-time driver for 2024, any more than Ricciardo, as teams are clear with their driver plans for the medium to long term.
    2025 is another matter, but for 2024, only Team Hinwill & even that team is a stretch unless Zhou starts to underperform massively.

    1. I’d love to see Ricciardo join Bottas at Alfa Romeo. I wonder if he’d be willing to go to Alpha Tauri, I doubt Tsunoda has another season in him.

      1. @Jay Tsunoda would only get replaced by an RB driver from outside F1, most likely Iwasa, but certainly not by someone like Ricciardo.

        1. I like how certain you are. Got any stock tips?

  3. some racing fan
    17th February 2023, 10:04

    The IndyCar series’s schedule has got to expand, and this “revitalized” downtown Detroit street circuit, that unless it becomes good for racing will be a complete disaster. I have seen maybe 2 or 3 circuits worse than that one. This near-identical schedule to last year’s is not good for the product. They need to be at the Homestead-Miami oval, Mexico City, Watkins Glen, the Nashville oval, Mont-Tremblant, the Pikes Peak oval and have rounds in England (Donington wouldnt be bad), Japan (Motegi oval) and Surfers Paradise. This 17 race schedule- including 2 road course races at Indy is weak.

    1. Holding too many events each season outside of the US (used to be more than 2, could have changed?) would make them an international championship rather than a domestic one – meaning the FIA automatically become directly involved with it.
      Would the FIA endorse two somewhat comparable, top level, open wheel international championships concurrently? I doubt it.
      More to the point – would Indycar want to move away from their core market? And what is there to gain?
      A recent answer to a similar question by Roger Penske firmly points to them being quite content to stay in the US. It’s all working pretty well for them where things are, and they don’t want to deal with all the downsides that F1 suffers.

  4. So much drama for some livery reveals. We haven’t even started testing yet and the demands from fans are tiring! When the 5 red lights go out, none of this will matter.

    1. These are the same fans that will immediately start complaining if a driver “winges” on the radio, or Wolff or Horner “winge” in the media.

      1. @ciaran and @sjaakfoo: correct and correct

  5. It appears the Schumacher PR machine is considerably more successful than its subject.

    The machine has been grinding out stories telling us how wonderful he is and now they tell us that ‘other teams’ want to sign him and the future looks rosy. Strange that when they had the opportunity to sign him just a few weeks ago, none of them was even vaguely interested in giving him a seat. But best not mention that…
    My money is on him never getting another full time driver seat in F1 in spite of all the hyperbole.

    1. I pretty much agree with this.

      Not sure if others will think the same as me here, but I think his overall performance including everything was no better than Latifi. He had a few more signs of good speed, but latifi wasn’t without them. he did well in Hungary in 2021 and japan last year for example. But despite Latifi and Mazepin getting criticized for their crashes, schumacher actually crashed far, far more than both of them. In 2021, he was the most expensive driver in terms of the repair bills for damaged caused by crashes, and he also had the most of anyone last year too.

      He is far too crash prone and not really fast enough to be of that much interest to other teams in my opinion. I think it is more related because of his name and family.

      Grosjean was deemed to be crash prone and the vast majority wanted rid of him. Yes, Schumacher is way younger, but he was actually worse than Grosjean in his final season. I don’t see much reason for teams actually being interested in giving him a seat. Giovinazzi looked better to me and he’s now out of F1.

Comments are closed.