Mercedes told Lewis Hamilton to give up fourth place to Carlos Sainz Jnr despite not knowing whether he would get a penalty for passing the Ferrari driver off-track.
Hamilton gained the place from his rival as the pair went side-by-side through the first corner at the start. However Hamilton ran wide at the exit, putting all four wheels outside track limits, and Mercedes were concerned he might be penalised for gaining a position off-track.The FIA no longer advises teams whether to give up positions to avoid penalties in such situations, as was the case in earlier seasons. Mercedes were therefore unsure whether Hamilton would be penalised for the move.
Mercedes technical director James Allison confirmed Hamilton “didn’t have to” give the place up. “It was a question of judgement,” he said in a video released by the team.
“We all saw the start of the race along with all the people who viewed it. We saw the little tangle that Lewis and Carlos got into with Lewis just being edged wide off the circuit, keeping it lit and getting ahead of Carlos.
“Immediately the question in all our minds, and Lewis’ mind is: Was that place gained by leaving the track? Did I gain an advantage by leaving the track?
“You know in the back of your head that you get a little bit more leniency from the stewards sometimes in the first corner of the first lap of a race. But you can’t rely on it.”
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
The FIA has increased the standard penalty for gaining a position by going off-track from five seconds to 10 seconds this year. This made Mercedes less willing to risk staying ahead and being penalised.
“You know that the consequences if you don’t give the place back and the stewards rule against you is worse than just giving the place back,” Allison explained. “So we did what we always do which is get on the blower to the FIA and ask for a bit of guidance as to whether that looked a bit much to them.
“They did what they always do which is to be as inscrutable as the sphinx and say ‘well that’s up to you, you need to make your own judgement.’ The more we looked at it, the more we thought we probably won’t get away with this.”
Race control announced on the third lap of the race that the incident had been noted. On the following lap they confirmed Hamilton was under investigation for leaving the track and gaining an advantage, which led Mercedes to act.
“While we were thinking about it we saw the messaging come up to say that the incident was being investigated. Which we were pretty sure was going to be the case and we just thought the balance of risk was one where we had better to surrender that place.
“We therefore asked Lewis to give the place back. He knew the situation, he gave up the place without a word, he didn’t even put up a breath of a fight on the radio because he understands that balance of risk as well.”
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
The stewards ultimately ruled Hamilton had gained an advantage by going off the track but did not penalise him because he returned the position.
“As things turned out, we’re glad we did because the stewards subsequently ruled in a way that made it clear that had we pushed our luck we would have ended up with a penalty.”
Although the decision ultimately made no difference to Hamilton’s finishing position, Allison believes they made the correct call to give up the place instead of risk a 10-second penalty.
“Giving back that place to Carlos, a place that we didn’t earn legitimately at the start, cost one second or something like that. So, nine seconds of extra penalty to be served and that could have had quite a significant impact later in the race.
“As things turned out with some of the floor damage to Lewis’ car, and the subsequent penalty he had for crossing the white line on pit entry, if he had served it, it wouldn’t have made a world of difference.
“But early in the race when everything was still possible then it was clearly the right thing to do; to take the hit of giving the place back to Carlos, not incurring the wrath of the stewards, not getting a 10 second penalty and fighting forward from that point.”
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Miss nothing from RaceFans
Get a daily email with all our latest stories - and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:
2024 Austrian Grand Prix
- Austrian GP clash will have taught Norris how to race Verstappen – Ricciardo
- Verstappen was “lucky” tyre damage didn’t force him to retire like Norris
- Pirelli introducing new C6 tyre to improve racing on street tracks next year
- Norris admits ‘overreacting’ but queries why Verstappen avoided track limits penalty
- Norris and Verstappen’s Austrian GP collision “blown out of proportion” – rivals
Applebook
3rd July 2024, 15:27
Wouldn’t have mattered. Lewis far too slow to beat Sainz anyway.
Leroy (@g-funk)
3rd July 2024, 15:44
The headline is a bit misleading. The “inscrutable” response from the FIA wasn’t what prompted them to give the position back; it was their internal judgment of the incident that determined they would receive a penalty and Lewis should give the place back before a penalty could be issued that prompted them to give the position back. But that is a hard headline to write.
Red Andy (@red-andy)
3rd July 2024, 15:51
Breaking news: The system works as intended. More when we get it.
FlyingLap (@flyinglapp)
3rd July 2024, 16:47
And Mercedes needed Hamilton to give the place back to Sainz before he caught and overtook Russell.
SteveP
3rd July 2024, 17:44
Hamilton fan and non-Q-Anon member here.
There is no conspiracy, Lewis is fine.
matt90
3rd July 2024, 18:43
They might just mean that passing Russell would make any order to give the place back to Sainz or receiving a penalty more awkward.
FlyingLap (@flyinglapp)
3rd July 2024, 22:12
Exactly. Thank you.
Jere (@jerejj)
3rd July 2024, 18:39
I already noticed Hamilton being briefly off-track on the longest straight in the live footage, but he didn’t seem to overtake while being off or even gain a speed advantage that would’ve helped him get past into Remus, but a wise move just in case.
Tristan
3rd July 2024, 21:19
Did they game it to give it back just before DRS? If he were fighting for a championship that would be the play for sure.
I’m still not a fan of the current penalty situation. Why we can’t we just have slowdowns like iRacing or Gran Turismo? The technology is definitely there.
DEARLS
4th July 2024, 5:09
There’s nothing inscrutable about Ben Sulliedman’s FIA rulings. If Hamilton is involved, its a penalty (“especially” harsh, because its Hamilton). If the braketester crashes into, crosses white lines, Holds people up in the pitlane, sticks two fingers up at yellow flags, its according to the new rule. Simples. Unless he’s crashed in which case they will give the creature a ten second penalty. And Liberty Media’s paddock pass pundits will nod their heads, and David Cuntard will give a little cheer and say its just a business.
Jere (@jerejj)
4th July 2024, 6:35
”They say you cut the course”
Jere (@jerejj)
4th July 2024, 6:38
To be fully serious, a good idea in theory, but an automatic remote-controlled slowdown effect or whatever could be risky if it happened in blind corners, such as shortly after Raidillon.
Rob Jarman
3rd July 2024, 23:38
The FIA and stewards should not make teams guess…. Be simple, transparent, and consistent.
Julian Goddard (@juliangoddard)
4th July 2024, 9:02
Hamilton would not have been penalised by the stewards.
His indiscretion was far less than that of Verstappen overtaking Norris off track at corner 3 for which no penalty was given.
Denis (@denis1304)
4th July 2024, 10:11
Mercedes is playing dumb. It’s well known fact, stewards do not discus this kind of mater with teams ever since new race directors came to F1 after Michael Masi.