Is Hamilton right McLaren threw victory away by “killing their tyres”?

2024 Italian GP interactive data

Posted on

| Written by

Lewis Hamilton believes his former team McLaren squandered their chance to win the Italian Grand Prix by putting their drivers on two-stop strategies.

McLaren locked out the front row of the grid for today’s race but Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc split their two drivers at the start. While both McLaren drivers pitted twice, Leclerc only came in once, and took the chequered flag first.

Hamilton is convinced McLaren could have made a success of Leclerc’s winning strategy. “Looking at the race trace, I think McLaren had the pace, they just pushed too hard,” he told Sky. “They were doing much too fast laps early on and killed their tyres.”

He believes McLaren’s strategists were too hesitant to consider alternatives to two pit stops. “I guess they literally had planned for a two-stop,” said Hamilton. “That’s why they were pushing so hard.

Oscar Piastri, McLaren, Monza, 2024
Piastri’s lap times were still strong late in his first stint
“If they had just backed off and gone longer they could for sure have made a one-stop. But I was getting the information of the times they were doing, and there’s no way your tyres are going to last at that pace.”

The idea McLaren were wedded to a two-stop strategy is underlined by the haste with which they brought Lando Norris into the pits, seizing the opportunity to “undercut” Leclerc for second place. Norris was shaping up to pass Leclerc on the track at the time.

Two laps later, McLaren brought Oscar Piastri in from the lead. His lap times were holding up well compared to the second Ferrari of Carlos Sainz Jnr, which had also not yet pitted. McLaren appeared to bring him less due to the state of his tyres and more because they didn’t want to let him fall behind Norris and Leclerc, who swapped positions through their first pit stops.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

After the race Piastri dismissed the idea that pushing too hard early on made the one-stop strategy impossible for McLaren. However he conceded they could have approached the race differently in terms of both tactics and, crucially, driving technique.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Monza, 2024
Leclerc nursed his front-left to the finish
“I need to go back and look at what the graining level on Charles was when I pitted for the second time. Up until that point it was you know a pretty controlled race. We felt pretty early on that it was a two-stop race and maybe, in hindsight, there are things we could have done a bit differently from obviously a strategy point of view, but also a driving point of view to keep the options open a little bit more.

“But if the information I got is right, on the radio, then it wasn’t really a matter of driving slower. It was just kind of sticking with the graining and getting through it.

“Which, given that in practice when that happened you basically couldn’t hit the brake pedal because you turned your front left into a 50 pence coin, it seemed like a very risky thing to do so. Obviously, it was the right thing in hindsight but everyone’s a lot smarter when the chequered flag falls.”

Norris believes Leclerc’s skilful nursing of his front-left tyre, minimising the graining, was what allowed him to make the one-stop strategy work and win the race.

“We tried, we knew it was a quicker thing to do, but I think we just killed the tyres a little bit too easily,” he said. “And like Oscar said, when you’re in third, it’s a much easier position to just try and risk and do such a thing. So I don’t think we can be too disappointed.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

“I think it was a lot riskier for us to try and do it than it was for Charles, and he made it work. So, yeah, hats off to them and Ferrari and himself because the driving part makes a big difference out there.”

2024 Italian Grand Prix lap chart

The positions of each driver on every lap. Click name to highlight, right-click to reset. Toggle drivers using controls below:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Italian Grand Prix race chart

The gaps between each driver on every lap compared to the leader’s average lap time. Very large gaps omitted. Scroll to zoom, drag to pan and right-click to reset. Toggle drivers using controls below:

2024 Italian Grand Prix lap times

All the lap times by the drivers (in seconds, very slow laps excluded). Scroll to zoom, drag to pan and toggle drivers using the control below:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Italian Grand Prix fastest laps

Each driver’s fastest lap:

Rank # Driver Car Lap time Gap Avg. speed (kph) Lap no.
1 4 Lando Norris McLaren-Mercedes 1’21.432 256.1 53
2 44 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1’21.512 0.080 255.85 53
3 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull-Honda RBPT 1’21.745 0.313 255.12 43
4 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren-Mercedes 1’21.943 0.511 254.5 53
5 63 George Russell Mercedes 1’22.036 0.604 254.22 49
6 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin-Mercedes 1’22.232 0.800 253.61 52
7 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin-Mercedes 1’22.944 1.512 251.43 46
8 11 Sergio Perez Red Bull-Honda RBPT 1’22.971 1.539 251.35 47
9 55 Carlos Sainz Jnr Ferrari 1’23.219 1.787 250.6 53
10 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari 1’23.226 1.794 250.58 33
11 27 Nico Hulkenberg Haas-Ferrari 1’23.275 1.843 250.43 44
12 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas-Ferrari 1’23.437 2.005 249.95 51
13 77 Valtteri Bottas Sauber-Ferrari 1’23.609 2.177 249.43 52
14 43 Franco Colapinto Williams-Mercedes 1’23.728 2.296 249.08 53
15 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine-Renault 1’23.755 2.323 249 51
16 23 Alexander Albon Williams-Mercedes 1’23.918 2.486 248.51 53
17 3 Daniel Ricciardo RB-Honda RBPT 1’24.219 2.787 247.63 52
18 31 Esteban Ocon Alpine-Renault 1’24.343 2.911 247.26 52
19 24 Zhou Guanyu Sauber-Ferrari 1’25.092 3.660 245.09 17
20 22 Yuki Tsunoda RB-Honda RBPT 1’26.198 4.766 241.94 4

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Italian Grand Prix tyre strategies

The tyre strategies for each driver:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Italian Grand Prix pit stop times

How long each driver’s pit stops took:

Rank # Driver Team Complete stop time (s) Gap to best (s) Stop no. Lap no.
1 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren 23.793 1 16
2 11 Sergio Perez Red Bull 24.03 0.237 2 35
3 31 Esteban Ocon Alpine 24.146 0.353 1 31
4 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull 24.15 0.357 2 41
5 44 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 24.155 0.362 2 37
6 4 Lando Norris McLaren 24.169 0.376 1 14
7 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine 24.203 0.41 2 30
8 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin 24.209 0.416 2 36
9 55 Carlos Sainz Jnr Ferrari 24.313 0.52 1 19
10 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine 24.335 0.542 1 10
11 77 Valtteri Bottas Sauber 24.41 0.617 1 33
12 44 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 24.469 0.676 1 15
13 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin 24.501 0.708 2 35
14 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari 24.551 0.758 1 15
15 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren 24.67 0.877 2 38
16 11 Sergio Perez Red Bull 24.728 0.935 1 23
17 23 Alexander Albon Williams 24.801 1.008 1 17
18 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin 24.866 1.073 1 12
19 4 Lando Norris McLaren 24.87 1.077 2 32
20 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin 24.98 1.187 1 19
21 43 Franco Colapinto Williams 25.147 1.354 1 16
22 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin 25.269 1.476 3 50
23 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas 25.672 1.879 1 14
24 63 George Russell Mercedes 26.297 2.504 2 33
25 24 Zhou Guanyu Sauber 27.138 3.345 1 15
26 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull 28.198 4.405 1 22
27 3 Daniel Ricciardo RB 30.317 6.524 1 11
28 63 George Russell Mercedes 32.696 8.903 1 11
29 27 Nico Hulkenberg Haas 36.576 12.783 2 32
30 27 Nico Hulkenberg Haas 38.875 15.082 1 5

2024 Italian Grand Prix

Browse all 2024 Italian Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

29 comments on “Is Hamilton right McLaren threw victory away by “killing their tyres”?”

  1. Damn if you do, damn if you don’t. It’s easier to go on the alternative strategy when you’re the underdog in the race as was the case with Ferrari. The difference was marginal anyway, it could’ve gone both ways, just like Lewis and George at Spa (pre DSQ)

    1. +1, hindsight is a wonderful thing

      1. notagrumpyfan
        2nd September 2024, 7:37

        Indeed.
        The headline is incorrect stating that they were “killing their tyres” (more than Leclerc and the others).
        It’s just that they didn’t believe in ‘rising from the dead’ as the Italians do.

    2. Not necessarily. Lando has proven he can nurse tires better than most. The should’ve split strategies putting Lando on the one stop and Piastri on the two. It was clear early on the Ferrari had good race pace so they couldn’t count on a big delta to be able to catch and overtake them.
      I think the issue is they were so busy watching each other they didn’t see the threat from the Ferraris.

    3. @fer-no65 given Monza has traditionally been a one stop race, it could be pointed out that it was those that were going for two stop strategies, such as McLaren, who were gambling on the alternative strategy paying off.

    4. No, The race was theirs if Piastri hadn’t decided to sabotage his own teammate’s championship run. Lando really has to pull his head out from under him self, and realize Oscar will end his champion ship run in a heart beat, Lando must destroy Oscar, by any means necessary, and make his team beg for him to give places back to his teammate.

  2. Yep, Hamilton’s right, the lap time data shows the McLarens were racing each other rather than looking after their tyres Leclerc-style and allowing themselves tactical flexibility. Still, seems to be all part of their genius game plan to avoid having to compete for the WDC.

    1. I don’t even think they were racing each other that much, for the first stint Norris just sat behind Leclerc. It felt like they got their setup wrong on looking after the hard tyres and they pushed them too early after the stops which I concede was possibly when vying to beat each other to the undercut/overcut.

      1. @slowmo I watched a post-race YT video on the race that highlighted the fast lap times being traded mid race by Piastri and Norris and the damage being done to the left front. That data analysis confirms Hamilton’s imprecision that the two McLarens were racing each other rather than looking after the tyres – I’d take his assessment as informed and accurate.

    2. If thy were racing each other to death how Leclerc was still so close? The fact is that Leclerc pushed Norris he was close. But Piastri was 5 seconds in front of Norris.

    3. Yeah, I also think Hamilton saw that right. They were pushing the laps instead of just gently bedding those tyres in and making them last the distance.

      1. pretty much, Lando lost the lead because he didn’t think his teammate was stupid enough to throw the race, his mistake apparently. Lando has to see his teammate as an enemy, and destroy him completely. Even if it means ruining Piastri’s race, putting him off the track, running him off and in to a barrier, etc, He has to do what the guys leading the team refuse to do, and that’s win.

  3. I don’t know. Leclerc was doing the same lap times as the McLaren and he made the one stopper work. So he was either plane faster or he could push and make his tyres last at the same time.
    But Piastri was going just fine until they pitted him. It was really only Norris who fell away

    1. Leclerc made the one stopper work by making his second stint right, not the first.

  4. Thanks to racefans laptime tool and reducing it to Leclerc, Piastri and Norris what is impressive is the consistency of Leclerc laptimes, like a robot. Even at last lap where he allowed himself to make almost same laptime as in lap 32.

    1. Leclerc’s driving on those Hards was amazing – it looks like he would still be doing 1:23.5s this morning if they’d let him.

  5. Like HAM but if McLaren blew it then so didn’t Mercedes and Red Bull. Those cars are good enough to beat McLaren if they do one less pit stop.

    1. Sainz didn’t blow it and could not beat the McLarens. If Mercedes and Red Bull were even further behind, there was no point in trying that.

      1. Russell was 3rd. Unfortunately, he blew it at the start

  6. Lewis always like to stir the pot ;)
    But listening to his reaction on his own quali result he better focus on his own performance or lack thereoff

    1. There are others who should look after their qualy pace. And regarding race he was flawless, and achieved what was in the car. But we know your biased hate, so your distractor comment is as surprising as christmas in december.

      1. “Hate”? What are you, in puberty or worse?
        Stating the facts is never “hate”,.
        And yes i am biased and well aware of it.
        You are obviously not!

        1. There are literally dozens of your anti Lewis comments all over any article related to him. So dont cry around for being called out on your biased hate. And dont claim to state facts when all you do is stating your twisted reality.

  7. Lewis narrowly missed out on the fastest lap at the end there.

  8. It seemed to get lost in the race but it was good to see Franco Colapinto complete his first race and set the fastest lap of the 2 williams drivers. Very acceptable showing for his first F1 race

    1. Just the fact he wasn’t meandering around in 20th shows how bad Logan was on Sundays for the last few years.

    2. Yes, couldn’t finish much higher than that in a tough midfield with Alonso and unlike de Vries 2 years ago, he had to race against Albon!

      A good sign that Kimi and Ollie and Jack and all these F2 drivers will be just fine. Looking forward to seeing how Bearman goes in Baku (it will be him, Haas isn’t run by a nutter any more…)

  9. I guess I’m not as focused upon the relevant information as I should be as my take away from that was “why did Oscar refer to a 50 pence coin, and not a 50 cent coin?”

    1. Because Oscar has spent very little of his teenage and adult life in Australia. He has been UK based for a decade.

Comments are closed.