Antonelli’s crash left Mercedes low on current-spec spares, says Russell

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: Mercedes do not have a much in the way of spare parts after Andrea Kimi Antonelli’s practice crash, says George Russell.

In brief

Mercedes low on spares after crash

After Antonelli crashed his car during Friday practice, Russell admitted that Mercedes are running low of spare parts in case any further mishaps befall him or team mate Lewis Hamilton

“Obviously we’ve lost quite a few parts,” Russell said. “Fingers crossed Lewis and I don’t do any further damage, otherwise we’ll have to revert back to some of the old parts, unless we can get some new pieces made in the interim.

“It’s not the end of the world as long as we both don’t do any further damage. As it stands, we don’t have any spares of our upgraded stuff.”

Colapinto will ‘learn how to drink’ for debut

Williams rookie Franco Colapinto says he will have to learn to get used to the onboard drinks system in his car for his grand prix debut today.

Colapinto, will start 18th on the grid for his first F1 race, which is expected to take place in temperatures of over 30C, and the newcomer has had difficulty operating his drinks system so far. “It’s going to be really hot, so I will have to learn how to drink,” he said.

“It’s been a quick weekend. Everything has been going on very, very quick. I have enjoyed it a lot and taking in a lot of information. So a lot of things I’ve been learning so far. A lot of things to learn, of course, in the race and let’s see how it goes.”

Ferrari take COTA WEC pole

Ferrari’s number 51 car will start from pole position for Sunday’s Lone Star Le Mans World Endurance Championship race at Circuit of the Americas.

Antonio Giovinazzi set the best time in Hyperpole with a 1’50.390, while Robert Kubica made it a Ferrari one-two in the number 83 car. The number two Cadillac will start third on the grid, just ahead of the number 35 Alpine in fourth.

The highest place Toyota, the number seven car, will start down in ninth on the grid, the only Toyota to reach the shootout session. The top nine positions in Hyperpole were covered by just under six tenths of a second.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from X (formerly Twitter), TikTok and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

With it finally confirmed that Andrea Kimi Antonelli will fill Lewis Hamilton’s seat at Mercedes in 2025, Bernasaurus wonders if this is a premature promotion…

I cannot help shake the feeling that Toto Wolff, Mercedes want him to be the next Max Verstappen or Lewis Hamilton, etc, more than he is likely to be. Of course he can only be himself, and his career will be a long road ahead and he doesn’t have to win multiple championships to be deserving of a top seat in F1. I just feel that a few drivers might wonder what they didn’t do that Kimi did to get the drive?

I wish him all the best regardless, and in an era where F1 teams seem more reluctant than ever to give young drivers a chance, it’s nice to see it when it does happen.
Bernasaurus

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Chris Sz, Meander, Glaszwiebel and Erzen!

On this day in motorsport

Carlos Sainz Jnr's 2024 Italian Grand Prix helmet
Will he take victory on his birthday? Sainz turns 30 today

Author information

Will Wood
Will has been a RaceFans contributor since 2012 during which time he has covered F1 test sessions, launch events and interviewed drivers. He mainly...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

14 comments on “Antonelli’s crash left Mercedes low on current-spec spares, says Russell”

  1. COTD: many greats are known for terrible starts.
    – Vettel has the record for the fastest penalty ever from debut into F1. > 4 time world champion
    – Hamilton crashed his Mercedes on his first day of testing in 2013 with them > 7 time world champion
    – Verstappen was known to be over aggressive and dangerous in his first few years > 3 time world champion.

    Sometimes the people who commit the most serious mistakes are the ones to acheive great things

    1. Vettel being a couple of kmh off the pit lane speed is nothing compared to crashing a car, man. As bad starts go that’s not a good example.

    2. By that metric Maldonado would have surpassed Hamilton, sad he was sacked before his greatest time…

      With purple font off, a bit like COTD I’m split about the move. I also criticise the lack of rotation in the drivers in F1, but it would probably have been best for him to be in a Williams couple of years and Sainz in that Mercedes. Learning in a top team is often learning under pressure which can go either ways. Wish him the best anyway and hope we continue to have a fight between 4 teams at the top next year.

      1. Greatest crashpion of all time! Maybe de Cesaris was better.

    3. “Hamilton crashed his Mercedes on his first day of testing in 2013 with them”

      Yes, Hamilton crashed, but it was due to a hydraulic failure in the car, and it would have happened whoever was driving it. It wasn’t a result of Hamilton going faster than the car was capable of. Rosberg later had a problem with the car setting on fire during testing, and no, he wasn’t having a sneaky Woodbine when it happened.

  2. Ironically, Red Bull used to be the organization most willing to hand opportunities for up-&-coming drivers, but less & less over time relative to Mercedes, Alpine, McLaren.

    1. notagrumpyfan
      1st September 2024, 8:52

      Red Bull used to be the organization most willing to hand opportunities for up-&-coming drivers

      A bit of an open door, as they are the only organisation with two teams.

      The major team giving most chances to rookie drivers is of course McLaren.
      All young Red Bull drivers have to start in the junior team, whereas McLaren (without a junior team and less connections – PU deals – to smaller teams) contracts promising drivers straight into one of their seats: either successfully like Hamilton, Piastri, and (tough a bit longer) Norris, or unsuccessfully like Vandoorne.

      1. Magnussen and Perez during that time too. So, by a wide margin, they’ve given the most rookies a shot in the main team. HRT was another proxy that allowed multiple drivers to get their start this is no longer around and now, with Sauber owned by Audi and Williams financially stabilized and ambitious, only Haas and RB will remain as teams whose model will be rookie friendly. And, as the field continues to tighten up under the new regs, you’ll see less and less willingness to take a punt on new drivers. So, yet another reason Andretti not only should have been allowed in, but an 11th team is desperately needed.

        1. less and less willingness even from Haas and RB*

    2. I find this recurring sentiment odd considering they literally just gave DeVries a shot last season, have announced Lawson will be driving next season and the fact their junior teams haven’t really had any clear standouts to give seats to. Had they, you would have seen other teams pick them up. Finally, they’ve given exponentially more drivers shots than any other team on the grid by a large margin since joining F1 and even over the course of the last two seasons, no team will have given more drivers a shot than them even w/the task of keeping Max happy complicating matters.

      1. Nick T., in the case of de Vries, people don’t think that counts because Red Bull were forced to recruit a new driver – they wanted to keep the same Gasly-Tsunoda line up for 2023, and only changed because Gasly wanted to move to Alpine.

        Red Bull did not have any plans at the time to hire a new driver at the time, and de Vries got the job because Red Bull needed somebody to replace Gasly, they didn’t have anyone within their own junior team that could do the job and de Vries was one of a limited number of drivers on the market with a superlicence available at relatively short notice. As was made clear not long afterwards, if Ricciardo had been available earlier, they’d have hired him, not de Vries.

        As for Lawson, whilst Marko was saying that Lawson would drive for them earlier this year, Horner has been more ambivalent and suggested that Lawson might be loaned to another team instead, indicating he would prefer to maintain the current line ups at both teams.

        1. Those statements are weird, anon.

          A rookie hire doesn’t count, because the team had a (late) vacancy. Seriously?

          And if Red Bull preferred Ricciardo in that seat at the start of the season, then they would have given it to him.
          It’s more that both weren’t convinced that this was the right move: Ricciardo wanted (to wait for) a seat at a bigger team, and Red Bull wasn’t sure about his worth as a driver (rather than marketing opportunity) at that time.

  3. Amazed people are making so much out of an FP1 crash. Anyway, it’s never explained why Fordapinto will have to learn to use his drinks bottle. Was he having some trouble with it in practice or something?

  4. The collaboration between UN Tourism and the FIA will contribute to advancing the understanding of sports tourism’s potential.

    Which would probably put Saudi in conflict with the FIA and the UN, unless the chair of the human rights commission happened to be from Saudi – oh, they are.
    Stand clear, sports washing in progress.

Comments are closed.