Ferrari team principal Frederic Vasseur said they could have considered a protest over McLaren’s rear wing design.
McLaren has since confirmed it will change the design of its rear wing following questions over its legality after video footage from the Azerbaijan Grand Prix showed it deforming under high loads.Vasseur said the question of the design’s legality was “more than borderline.” The rear wing appeared to help McLaren maximise their top speed in a race where Oscar Piastri held Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc back to win.
The FIA previously began studying the behaviour of teams’ front wings in order to ensure they were not flexing excessively at high speed. However Vasseur believes McLaren’s rear wing was obviously deflecting to improve its performance.
“I think there is a kind of confusion between what’s happened with the front wing and the rear wing,” he said. “The front wing, we all agree that it could be a grey area because in the [technical directive], the first paragraph of the TD is saying that you can’t design part of the car with the intention of the deformation. Intention is difficult to manage.
“The rear wing story is completely different because on the article you have also a maximum deflection. And this is black or white. It’s not grey, dark grey, light grey – it’s black and [white] for me, it’s clear.”
Asked whether Ferrari could have protested McLaren’s car had they realised how its wing was behaving sooner, Vasseur said: “It could have been possible, but it’s not so easy to have evidence.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
“Now, honestly, I want to turn this page because I want to be focused on the future. Baku and Monza are behind us. We have still seven races to go. We have to win this weekend and it will be the best reply that we can give.”
The FIA stated yesterday that all wings which met their deflection tests were considered legal. Although McLaren potentially gained a benefit from running the design before agreeing to change it, Vasseur does not believe Ferrari missed a trick by not being as aggressive as their rivals were with their aerodynamics.
“Honestly, we are pushing at the limit of what we are considering legal, I can’t ask the team to overshoot this limit,” he said.
Miss nothing from RaceFans
Get a daily email with all our latest stories - and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
2024 Singapore Grand Prix
- Ricciardo’s brake woe and why Perez thought he had an engine problem: Singapore GP radio
- ‘Perez is only quicker when he has DRS’: How Hulkenberg’s Haas beat a Red Bull – again
- Mercedes explain “clear mistake” strategy call which left Hamilton “so angry”
- “Sometimes I wonder why I do this”: How Hamilton endured a slog to sixth in Singapore
- F1’s rules need surgery as well as sticking plaster after fastest lap controversy
MichaelN
20th September 2024, 19:11
Why would Ferrari need to have evidence?
The FIA has often adjusted their flexing tests when it turned out the forces applied were insufficient to measure top-speed bending. They could have adjusted the loads to better test rear-wing shenanigans as well.
The fact that McLaren instantly reverted to a different design once their antics were put in the spotlight is all that one needs to know. They know what they did.
pcxmac (@pcxmac)
21st September 2024, 5:35
Ferrari are waiting for their turn. No need to protest something that will eventually be handed to them. This is F1 ;)