Lando Norris, McLaren, Singapore, 2024

2024 Singapore Grand Prix race result and championship points

Formula 1

Posted on

| Written by

Lando Norris has won the Singapore Grand Prix for McLaren ahead of Max Verstappen and Oscar Piastri.

P. # Driver Team Car
1 4 Lando Norris McLaren-Mercedes MCL38
2 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB20
3 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren-Mercedes MCL38
4 63 George Russell Mercedes W15
5 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari SF-24
6 44 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes W15
7 55 Carlos Sainz Jnr Ferrari SF-24
8 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR24
9 27 Nico Hulkenberg Haas-Ferrari VF-24
10 11 Sergio Perez Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB20
11 43 Franco Colapinto Williams-Mercedes FW46
12 22 Yuki Tsunoda RB-Honda RBPT 01
13 31 Esteban Ocon Alpine-Renault A524
14 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR24
15 24 Zhou Guanyu Sauber-Ferrari C44
16 77 Valtteri Bottas Sauber-Ferrari C44
17 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine-Renault A524
18 3 Daniel Ricciardo RB-Honda RBPT 01
19 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas-Ferrari VF-24
20 23 Alexander Albon Williams-Mercedes FW46

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Max Verstappen leads the drivers championship by 52 points from Lando Norris after the Singapore Grand Prix.

2024 F1 drivers championship standings

Position Driver Points Gap to leader
1 Max Verstappen 331
2 Lando Norris 279 52
3 Charles Leclerc 245 86
4 Oscar Piastri 237 94
5 Carlos Sainz Jnr 190 141
6 Lewis Hamilton 174 157
7 George Russell 155 176
8 Sergio Perez 144 187
9 Fernando Alonso 62 269
10 Nico Hulkenberg 24 307
11 Lance Stroll 24 307
12 Yuki Tsunoda 22 309
13 Alexander Albon 12 319
14 Daniel Ricciardo 12 319
15 Pierre Gasly 8 323
16 Oliver Bearman 7 324
17 Kevin Magnussen 6 325
18 Esteban Ocon 5 326
19 Franco Colapinto 4 327
20 Zhou Guanyu 0 331
21 Logan Sargeant 0 331
22 Valtteri Bottas 0 331

Points available over remaining rounds: 180

2024 F1 constructors championship standings

Position Team Points Gap to leader
1 McLaren 516
2 Red Bull 475 41
3 Ferrari 441 75
4 Mercedes 329 187
5 Aston Martin 86 430
6 RB 34 482
7 Haas 31 485
8 Williams 16 500
9 Alpine 13 503
10 Sauber 0 516

Points available over remaining rounds: 309

Standings with 18 out of 24 races complete.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

40 comments on “2024 Singapore Grand Prix race result and championship points”

  1. I predicted Norris would either smash the field by 30+ seconds or crash. He basically did both.

    Most impressive drivers aside from Norris:
    1. Colapinto who finished on Perez’s tail and is already better than Albon in his third race

    2. Alonso who was under 2 secs behind Sainz on the last lap in a crap box

    3. Leclerc

    Honorable mention to Hulk and Max. Least impressive: Piastri, Stroll and Perez

    1. Hopefully all this nonsense about Piastri being better than Norris will now go away. Obviously it won’t, but we can but hope.

      1. It remains the same: Norris is usually faster in qualifying and races. Piastri is an extremely good racer, which is (was, still is) a Norris weak point. Maybe. Today was the first time he held pole in Formula 1. More than that, I felt he looked more serious this weekend, maybe even a hint of anger. If so, great, probably what was needed.

        1. Oh, he was furious. He felt humiliated after OP’s victory and felt like people were beginning to dismiss him. That’s why I expected him to try to do a Senna Monaco type drive in which he didn’t just want to win. He wanted to humiliate his teammate.

          1. Seems so, but if so it’s a champion mindset. I was impressed.

          2. I agree David, but he should have 5+ dominant wins at this point. While it was a great weekend, I’ll be impressed when he strings multiple dominant wins/weekends together.

    2. 1. Colapinto who finished on Perez’s tail and is already better than Albon in his third race

      Colapinto is obviously much better than Seargant.
      But also Bearman seems better than Magnussen. And both are better than Perez.

      It really feels like half of the F1 grid should be replaced by better F2 and IndyCar drivers.

      1. I meant:
        But also Bearman seems better than Magnussen, who’s making Hulkenberg look better than he really is.

      2. We’ve had many disappointing F2 drivers too. I disagree that FC is just better than Logan. He’s had de facto identical quali pace to Albon and been better in the races. And Albon has been driving this car for years now.

        IMO, it would be insane for Audi to choose Bottas over Colapinto, especially since they were trying to sign Albon who got beat today by FC while Bottas was 5+ seconds behind Zhou at many points. Bottas might have just cost himself a contract.

        Anyway, we’ll have to wait until next year to get a true idea of how competitive the F2 drivers with at least three rookie F2 drivers in Doohan, Lawson and Bearman.

        1. It really should be Bortoleto over Colapinto. Bortoleto is younger and faster beating Colapinto in F2 this year and In F3 last year despite Colapinto having a years experience over him.

          1. Maybe so, but F2 success doesn’t always translate automatically into F1 success. Also, FC is in a less competitive F2 car. Still, AB has been more impressive in the junior formulas no doubt.

    3. I wasn’t really that impressed by Norris almost crashing himself out. And not sure why you are so down on Piastri. He made some very solid overtakes and drove a solid race, right?

      1. Not sure why you are so down on Piastri. He made some very solid overtakes and drove a solid race, right?

        Finishing that far behind your team mate when you couldn’t even qualify within 0.5 seconds is not good enough

      2. I’m less down on him and more down on those who’ve been saying Oscar is going to surpass Lando any day now. I think you said “Oscar is coming like a bullet train.” lol

        I want OP to beat Norris as I dislike Norris while I really like Piastri, but he’s been nowhere near LN in quali this season and w/out LN constantly choking, people would instead be saying “Oscar needs to pick up his improvement.” To be clear, I think Oscar is a very good driver and will be a Sainz or George level driver. I just don’t think he’ll be in the league of a driver like CL let alone MV, FA or LH.

      3. I’d put keeping concentration in the Singapore heat and being way in front down to necessary learning experience. Verstappen has had his lapses (iffy moments) too when way out in front. Leclerc has even gone off unpressured when in front.

      4. He finished 42s behind his teammate. 42! Sure, some of it was because of his poor qualifying but that is unacceptable.

    4. I loved Albon’s “they race me so hard” call after Colapinto’s move in T1. Seems he’s a little concerned with Colapinto.

  2. Maybe it’s finally time to adress certain 4 car team and engineering a fastest lap point??

    1. I look at it as more like Max having 3 tail gunners ;-)

  3. I have to say, I feel like Ricciardo stealing the fastest lap point kind of makes a mockery of non-points scoring drivers being able to remove the fastest lap point from other drivers. What if this was the last race and RB suspiciously made a bid for fastest lap to change the outcome of the championship?

    Why not just make it that the fastest lap point is always awarded to the driver with the fastest lap out of those who were classified in the top 10 finishers? This would stop at least some of the pitting 2 laps from the end nonsense, though drivers who are fortunate enough to have the gap behind themselves to put into will still luck into a free point in some circumstances. It would also prevent the statistical quirk that some races award one less point than others because the fastest lap gets ‘sniped’ by a low finisher.

    1. Oh, boo hoo. It’s called fastest lap. Not fastest lap for drivers in the top 10. And this has been happening to WDC contenders for years now (drivers outside the top 10 taking fastest lap). It’s enough that they’re not eligible for points.

      1. I don’t care about this particular occurrence. My opinion would be the same whether it’s a Williams stealing a point from a Mercedes competitor, or a Haas from a Ferrari competitor, or just a teammate helping out their team’s no.1 driver. I don’t see any reason to leave this rule open to manipulation when a simple tweak of the rulebook would remove any controversy. They have already tweaked the rule so that drivers outside the top 10 can’t gain the point themselves because they realised that would be open to gamesmanship, so this would just be closing off a further loophole.

    2. It also makes a mockery of Redbull pretending that RB are a separate entity, when they can literally tell another team how to drive their race in order to manipulate the result in their favour.

    3. That just sounds way dumb, ‘fastest lap while in the top 10’ why put the line there? what if Hamilton or Leclerc pitted and went for the fastest lap, just because they want the stat of having the fastest lap more than getting points for being 4th or 5th or 6th, then maybe the next suggestion would be a ‘fastest lap while in the podium’ line, it doesn’t make any sense, either is the actual fastest lap of the race, or is it not.

      If you want to prevent that statistical quirk, make it so the fastest lap awards a point no matter what, if would become incredible important to backmarkers to try for it creating ‘artificial fastest laps’ which is why FOM went for ‘in the top 10’, but it would be way more fair, actually guaranteed some late lap action no matter what, and if it was that way, Lando would have probably gotten his stolen anyway.

      1. Agree to disagree. If a driver in the points wants to give up their result to chase a fastest lap statistic then they are free to do so, but no team has ever or would even do such a thing, so there is no reason to expand it further than ‘fastest lap for points scorers only’.

        1. Your fix doesn’t fix anything at all, today Red Bull couldn’t pit Perez to do it, but there are other races when they could, as long as Perez is behind Norris and can pit and keep top 10, they will do it and there’s nothing this fix can do to stop it.

          You could also argue for going back to the fastest lap giving no points at all, that’s also a fix but one that doesn’t help Lando today.

          Ban the act of having ‘2 teams’ at all which is your point in the first place instead of this rule tweaking nonsense.

          1. Its pointless in the first place to award a point for fastest lap. It doesn’t mean much. Pole position is worth giving a point much more than FL.

          2. Yes, they could if he can maintain top 10, but most teams in most situations won’t do that because they would lose constructors points, which still matter. It would prevent the vast majority of these cases of low finishing drivers sniping the FL point. Doesn’t have to be to benefit someone for the WDC, it could just be a driver with nothing to play for who pits just to get that fastest lap stat – like we see Alonso often do when he’s running out of the points, and some others too.

          3. Keith, thinking about it, this year we have the exact situation where imo it makes no sense to pit perez and sacrifice points for a fastest lap: verstappen, without DNF, had the WDC in the bag, and if anything it would be wise to try and get as many points as possible for red bull, because it’s the WCC they seriously risk losing.

          4. And also let’s not forget: it was likely ricciardo’s last race, I see 2 reasons for ricciardo to go for that fastest lap, 1) to help red bull, and 2) to drive fast for the last time in his career.

          5. Also a 3rd reason in the fastest lap statistic actually.

      2. I like this idea, would give something to fight for to those drivers and cars that are out of points contention.

  4. Remember when people bashed Tsunoda for leaving the pits with a broken car just to be asked to park the car in the middle of the track to cause a Safety Car to help Max and they said the teams were independent?

    Now Ricciardo running last, for whatever reason decided he wanted to take the FL point from Norris.

    Pathetic showing from Red Bull. They have a 50-something points lead, we all know and we all want Andretti to join, and this supporting team to vanish from the face of the Earth and now they use it in the most despicable way possible. And still, Andretti won’t have the opportunity to join and this team that races for nothing will continue to take a slot.

    1. I think the Tsunoda example is just blatant cheating and should result in major penalties and fines. This was just strategic. Now, if you want to have the discussion of whether it’s fair for one organization to have two teams or have a de facto B-team who they can ask to do the same thing, that’s another question all together.

      1. Nah, it would be strategic if they asked Perez to do it.

        The teams can’t be “independent” only when it’s convenient. Given that McLaren seems to be the superior car, they might resort to this trick other times in the future and what is 1 point today might be 5 or 6 by the end of the season for a reason that has nothing to do with what the main team does in the track.

        1. I don’t think anyone has EVER believed RB is independent nor are they required to be. I also don’t think RBR will deny they did this to help Max. It’ll be lame if they do.

          1. nor are they required to be.

            They are; the FIA rightly investigated allegations of collusion between two teams after Jerez 1997. While evidence was unable to be found at the time, those involved (among which were David Coulthard and Patrick Head) later admitted that Ron Dennis had indeed reached out to Frank Williams and offered that McLaren would help Williams win the title(s) if in return Williams would help McLaren win a race should the situation to do so present itself. So in Jerez, Villeneuve duly moved over for both McLaren cars to finish 3rd and still clinch the title.

            Also more practically speaking, the F1 Sporting Regulations state that a team may and must run just two cars.

          2. If it was illegal for DR to have taken the fastest lap to help Max, he certainly wouldn’t have told the world that’s why the team did it. Also, in 1990s, the FIA was constantly inventing rules after the fact when they didn’t like something had changed. So, the fact is that JV DID just let the McLarens by without challenging them. There was no rule that TPs couldn’t talk to each other and agree on how they would race each other in order not to compromise each other at the benefit of another team. Mosley would have likely cited some vague catch all term like “unsporting behavior.”

  5. Ppl in redbull might be evaluating the cost of 2nd WC bt praising Perez performance throughout the season

  6. Best of the Rest Championship*:
    1) Haas 509 (HUL 301, MAG 193, BEA 15)
    2) RB 446 (TSU 235, RIC 211)
    3) Alpine 396 (OCO 200, GAS 196)
    4) Williams 338 (ALB 207, SAR 80, COL 51)
    5) Sauber 227 (ZHO 120, BOT 107)

    * regular points structure for bottom 5 teams, incl. FLAP & Sprint points

Comments are closed.