Lando Norris, McLaren, Yas Marina, 2024

Norris leads all-McLaren front row, Hulkenberg beats Verstappen to fourth

2024 Abu Dhabi GP qualifying report

Posted on

| Written by

Lando Norris heads a front row lock-out for McLaren in the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix with Carlos Sainz Jnr starting third behind Oscar Piastri.

McLaren will head into the constructors’ championship deciding race with a considerable advantage over rivals Ferrari, with Sainz third and Charles Leclerc starting 19th on the grid following his ten place grid penalty after he was eliminated from Q2 in 14th.

Nico Hulkenberg is set to start fourth but is under investigation for overtaking in the pit exit road against the race director’s instructions. Max Verstappen will start fifth, with Lewis Hamilton set to start his final race for Mercedes 16th after he was eliminated from Q1 in 18th.

Q1

The final qualifying session of the season got underway very lazily with no drivers in a rush to take to the track. Fernando Alonso scrubbed a set of hard tyres, while Aston Martin team mate Lance Stroll posted the first time of the evening.

Sergio Perez was the next to post a lap time, which was immediately deleted for exceeding track limits at the exit of the first corner. Franco Colapinto also lost his first timed lap for the same infraction at the first corner.

Carlos Sainz Jnr was the fastest of the initial runners with a 1’23.487, with Max Verstappen just three hundredths of a second slower and Kevin Magnussen carrying on Haas’ promising pace from practice in third ahead of the two McLarens of Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris. Just six tenths of a second covered first to 16th, the cut off point for Q2, as cars returned to the pit lane to prepare for their final runs.

Perez headed out for his final run but the stewards announced that his original deleted lap would be reinstated after looking closer at the replays. Red Bull did not inform him until he had completed his second push lap, which was not an improvement, leaving him unhappy that he had unnecessarily used another set of tyres.

Perez’s first time was good enough to get through, but Lewis Hamilton had dropped into the danger zone and needed to improve to reach Q2. However, he found Magnussen’s Haas to the inside at turn 14 as he completed his final push lap. Magnussen hit the apex bollard which was knocked under Hamilton’s car. Hamilton went on to miss the cut by under a tenth of a second in 18th in his final qualifying session for Mercedes.

Less than half a second covered the top 15, with Alexander Albon knocked out in 16th along with Zhou Guanyu in his final qualifying session for Sauber. Hamilton was out in 18th, with the two rookies Franco Colapinto and Jack Doohan eliminated slowest.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Q1 result

P. # Driver Team Model Time Gap
1 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari SF-24 1’23.302
2 77 Valtteri Bottas Sauber-Ferrari C44 1’23.481 0.179
3 55 Carlos Sainz Jnr Ferrari SF-24 1’23.487 0.185
4 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB20 1’23.516 0.214
5 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine-Renault A524 1’23.548 0.246
6 11 Sergio Perez Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB20 1’23.559 0.257
7 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas-Ferrari VF-24 1’23.632 0.330
8 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren-Mercedes MCL38 1’23.640 0.338
9 63 George Russell Mercedes W15 1’23.678 0.376
10 4 Lando Norris McLaren-Mercedes MCL38 1’23.682 0.380
11 27 Nico Hulkenberg Haas-Ferrari VF-24 1’23.722 0.420
12 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR24 1’23.729 0.427
13 30 Liam Lawson RB-Honda RBPT 01 1’23.733 0.431
14 22 Yuki Tsunoda RB-Honda RBPT 01 1’23.735 0.433
15 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR24 1’23.794 0.492
16 23 Alexander Albon Williams-Mercedes FW46 1’23.821 0.519
17 24 Zhou Guanyu Sauber-Ferrari C44 1’23.880 0.578
18 44 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes W15 1’23.887 0.585
19 43 Franco Colapinto Williams-Mercedes FW46 1’23.912 0.610
20 61 Jack Doohan Alpine-Renault A524 1’24.105 0.803

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Q2

After the traffic problems at the end of Q1, Verstappen was eager to get out early to set his first lap time of the second phase. He posted a 1’22.998 to set the initial benchmark, and Russell could not get within eight tenths of a second of that with his first lap.

The McLarens fared better at matching Verstappen’s pace, with Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri going second and third fastest with their first flying laps. Yuki Tsunoda got within half a second of Verstappen to go fourth, while Carlos Sainz Jnr was fifth.

After a scary moment at turn 14 on his first push lap saw him almost slide into the barrier, Charles Leclerc was sitting just nine thousandths of a second in safety in tenth place, ahead of the two Aston Martins of Alonso and Stroll. Magnussen also needed to improve to continue in 13th, as did Valtteri Bottas and Pierre Gasly.

While 14 of the 15 drivers returned to the track for a second run in the closing minutes, Verstappen climbed out of the car, seemingly confident that his fastest time would be quick enough to reach Q3. Everyone else took to the track on fresh tyres, except for Stroll on a used set.

Gasly’s improvement dropped Leclerc into the drop zone, but the Ferrari driver had appeared to go safe by setting the quickest time of the session. However, that time was deleted for exceeding track limits at the exit of turn one. As a result, the Ferrari driver was knocked out – another to the team’s championship hopes.

Perez only just squeezed through into Q3 by four hundredths of a second, with Bottas also reaching Q3 in what may be his final ever qualifying session. That meant that the two RBs of Tsunoda and Liam Lawson were eliminated, with Stroll out in 13th, Leclerc 14th and Magnussen eight tenths slower than his team mate in 15th.

The stewards annoucned that Nico Hulkenberg will be investigated after the session for allegedly overtaking at the pit exit road, which is forbidden for this weekend in the race director’s event notes.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Q2 result

P. # Driver Team Model Time Gap
1 55 Carlos Sainz Jnr Ferrari SF-24 1’22.985
2 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB20 1’22.998 0.013
3 27 Nico Hulkenberg Haas-Ferrari VF-24 1’23.040 0.055
4 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine-Renault A524 1’23.086 0.101
5 4 Lando Norris McLaren-Mercedes MCL38 1’23.098 0.113
6 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren-Mercedes MCL38 1’23.199 0.214
7 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR24 1’23.268 0.283
8 63 George Russell Mercedes W15 1’23.283 0.298
9 77 Valtteri Bottas Sauber-Ferrari C44 1’23.341 0.356
10 11 Sergio Perez Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB20 1’23.379 0.394
11 22 Yuki Tsunoda RB-Honda RBPT 01 1’23.419 0.434
12 30 Liam Lawson RB-Honda RBPT 01 1’23.472 0.487
13 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR24 1’23.784 0.799
14 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari SF-24 1’23.833 0.848
15 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas-Ferrari VF-24 1’23.877 0.892

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Q3

Having reached Q3 on a single run, Verstappen headed into Q3 with the advantage of two sets of soft tyres for the critical final phase of qualifying.

He used the first set to post the quickest time of the first runs, but only after almost losing the car and having to catch the car with a dramatic moment of oversteer exiting the final corner. That allowed Norris to get within four thousandths of a second of the Red Bull, with Piastri four hundredths of a second slower with his first effort that was originally deleted for exceeding track limits at turn one before being reinstated.

Verstappen was the last car out on track at the end of the session as the remaining nine drivers took to the circuit with fresh tyres for their final qualifying runs of 2024.

Perez improved to go fourth, but his time was beaten by both Bottas and then Hulkenberg, who went quickest of all. Piastri took the top spot with a 1’22.595, but that was beaten by his team mate Norris by two tenths of a second. Sainz improved to third, with only Verstappen left to cross the line. However, Verstappen could not improve on his original push lap, leaving him only fifth and confirming the McLaren one-two.

Gasly qualified in sixth ahead of Russell and Alonso with Bottas taking ninth on the grid for what could be his final grand prix. Perez slumped to tenth by the end of the session, three tenths slower than his team mate.

After his pole lap, Norris asked McLaren to check if Sainz ahead of him had respected the maximum delta time given how much ground he made on the Ferrari. Sainz was investigated by the stewards for exceeding the maximum time, but no further action was taken, confirming his third place.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Q3 result

P. # Driver Team Model Time Gap
1 4 Lando Norris McLaren-Mercedes MCL38 1’22.595
2 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren-Mercedes MCL38 1’22.804 0.209
3 55 Carlos Sainz Jnr Ferrari SF-24 1’22.824 0.229
4 27 Nico Hulkenberg Haas-Ferrari VF-24 1’22.886 0.291
5 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB20 1’22.945 0.350
6 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine-Renault A524 1’22.984 0.389
7 63 George Russell Mercedes W15 1’23.132 0.537
8 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR24 1’23.196 0.601
9 77 Valtteri Bottas Sauber-Ferrari C44 1’23.204 0.609
10 11 Sergio Perez Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB20 1’23.264 0.669

Go ad-free for just £1 per month

>> Find out more and sign up

Miss nothing from RaceFans

Get a daily email with all our latest stories - and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:

2024 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

Browse all 2024 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix articles

Author information

Will Wood
Will has been a RaceFans contributor since 2012 during which time he has covered F1 test sessions, launch events and interviewed drivers. He mainly...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

47 comments on “Norris leads all-McLaren front row, Hulkenberg beats Verstappen to fourth”

  1. Checo got out-qualified by Zhou in the last two rounds & Bottas this time around, which speaks volumes & is beyond embarrassing.
    Max’s last lap was surprisingly poor in the end since he got out-qualified by even Hulkenberg, but I’m positive he’ll finish at least third in the race.

    1. “I had a good Q1, but we had a hard Q3. We’ll need to figure out what went wrong for next year.” – Sergio Perez post qualifying comments

    2. Give Bottas some credit that car had no business even being in Q3. Man was on a mission.

      1. Yes, impressive performance by bottas, very strong in q1, q2 and q3; if he’s leaving f1, he’s going out with fireworks!

  2. Why is Checo’s replacement going to Audi? Heck, if needs be, put Bottas in his seat. Liam isn’t even close to ready for that seat.

    1. They probably think he can’t do better than Perez because Perez beat him 10 years ago in their Force India days.

      Even when he drove the Racing Point and Aston Martin cars on short notice, this guy never dropped the ball.

      The fact that he has been jumping from small team to small team his whole career is difficult to understand.

  3. I think Apline have shot themselves in the foot. Having Ocon in the top 10 rather than Doohan 20th would have been pretty handy.

    1. @f1hornet Well, it could cost them. But to be fair, for whatever reason Ocon has not been competitive in recent races or looking like scoring points, apart from the one-off result in Brazil. I know Gasly has had upgrades while Ocon hasn’t, but they have suddenly looked like they are driving entirely different cars, having been evenly matched as teammates before that.

      Still, assuming Magnussen and Doohan don’t score, it will be hard for Hulk to outscore Gasly by the 6 points needed. It’s likely that Verstappen and Russel will get past both which would put them 6th and 7th. Haas might need some misfortune to hit Gasly because it’s unlikely that multiple cars would finish exactly between them (though there is a Redbull, a Ferrari and Mercedes also behind them).

      1. It was a very stupid move, but they clearly haven’t been giving Ocon any support since Monaco. So, that’s on them.

        Frankly, Alpine don’t deserve 6th. Without an incredibly lucky Brazil, they’re still fighting for 9th or 8th at best.

        1. I agree. I know the points system is what it is, and I don’t begrudge a weaker team capitalising on a freak opportunity, but I feel like Haas has been the stronger, more consistent team over the season, so I’m rooting for them to take p6.

          1. It would be difficult to design a points system that didn’t put Alpine ahead after Brazil, unless you want to devalue such anomalously good results even more than is already the case. We already have a system for determining the stronger, more consistent team over the course of a season – it’s called “watching.”

          2. @red-andy I understand that and I’m not arguing for a change of that part of the points system (though I was in favour of expanding the points paying positions to 12, which I suspect would help Haas more than Alpine this year, given Hulkenberg’s several 11th place finishes). But I’m talking about ‘rewarding’ the stronger, more consistent team over the season, not just ‘determining’, which doesn’t have any real impact to the teams.

    2. @f1hornet Ocon could’ve very well equally qualified last like in Qatar.

  4. Dear Red Bull,

    You can’t keep Perez at this point, and its obvious you’re not enthusiastic about Lawson, Tsnuoda, Hadjar, Colapinto or Ricciardo replacing him.

    Get. Hulk.

      1. But as he’d already been sent out on a second set of softs in Q1 it enraged Perez. “I told you man, why the **** don’t you check? We just wasted a set!” he yelled on team radio, before dismissing the race engineer’s counter-argument that almost everyone else ran a second set, too as “irrelevant”.

        I wish his engineer had replied, “Why don’t you learn how to drive.”

        Perez’s radio certainly sounds like a guy on the way out.

    1. The same Hulk that was outperformed by a rookie in Baku, the one that never managed to get on the podium in 230 race? That Hulk?

  5. It’s astonishing that with such a dominant car McLaren will barely win the constructors and only 5 (or 6) races this year. That’s 5 victories out of 18 grands prix! Even in 2005 with a terrible reliability, but similarly dominant car Raikkonen and Montoya managed to win 10 out of 15 races! It says everything about the current McLaren drivers and how good they really are.

    Meanwhile Max once again pulls off a miracle to qualify 5th in what is 5th or 6th quickest car.

  6. Well that’s as close to ruling out any chance of Ferrari still getting the WCC. Faulty equipment, another mistake when it counts by their lead driver… disappointing!

    Hamilton had better be back on form from race 1 in 2025, otherwise Vasseur is going to have to ask some tough questions about getting rid of Sainz.

    1. You never know though: points are scored on sunday, there’s no better example than brazil on how things can turn around in an eventful race!

  7. Russell not being investigated for impeding, not even mentioned in this article, seems he has the correct passport.

    1. There’s no such thing as bias! We’ve been told many times by angry British fans. So, you know it’s true. Move on. Don’t you dare make them cite the small handful of times a steward’s decision hurt them.

    2. The problem therevwad the lack of drama by lawson.
      He should have made a stage ready performace but just drove of.

    3. I hate these situations. Lawson kept his foot in and trusted that these cars will see him in the very last moment and clear the way. Russell was absolutely borderline today. This time it just went fine, but someday it’s gonna be an airplane accident with a car flying into the grandstands. The FIA has to do something about it. Last weekend they took the first stap, but I’d like to see these last corner pile ups sanctioned as well, especially as Russell had already so much space ahead of him and yet he still loitered and tried to build a gap.

      1. I’d like to know who are the stewards this time. Herbert? Warwick? No, really this is beyond ridiculous. I don’t want to support any talk about bias or other conspiracy, I just want to know how it differs from the episode in previous race which led to one of the drivers getting a penalty.

        1. Felix Holter
          Derek Warwick
          Loïc Bacquelaine
          Mohammed Al Hashmi

          Warwick seems to be a constant companion to question calls. I think at least three of these guys were involved in last week’s mess. I really wonder if they’ll let Herbert steward again. I truly hope not.

          Personally, I haven’t seen any of the incidents in question. Just a quick glimpse while live. So, I can’t offer an opinion if this is another case of bad stewarding.

          1. It was marginal. Three cars (both Mercedes and I think an Aston piled up before the last corner with Russell being the cork in the bottle. Lawson arrived on a flyer, passd two cars quite easily but Russell jumped out of the way at the very last moment. It looked quite dangerous, but Lawson was able to get his lap in without having to break or leave the racing line. As previous poster have stated: If he’d backed out it’s a slam dunk penalty, but he did floor it and miraculously his way cleared. But it should at least be investigated IMHO.

          2. Davethechicken
            7th December 2024, 18:06

            What is wrong with Herbert? Can you give a specific example where he treated a driver differently based.on their nationality or just vague accusations?

          3. Ordinarily I would say that it would be fine to wave George’s impeding out of the way as no harm was done (largely due to Lawson’s commitment). The problem is that it follows last week’s incident where neither driver was on a push lap and no harm was done. As George said himself of Max’s penalty:
            “Maybe it was a little bit harsh, but these are the rules”.

            Well, this quote would more accurately apply to George. Max’s penalty wasn’t in “the rules”. If George was penalised today, it would be a bit harsh, but within the rules. It’s okay that it was waved away, but it doesn’t look right next to Max’s inexplicable penalty. Absolute joke.

          4. What’s wrong with Johnny? Being born.

          5. I don’t know…maybe how deep his bad blood runs with Alonso. At one point, he even accused Alonso of upsetting his wife. And it seems like anytime he’s stewarded and had the slightest opportunity, he gave Alonso a highly questionable penalty. The worst case of all was giving Alonso an unprecedented 20-second penalty in Australia early this season. He’s also had extremely critical things to say about Max and was behind a controversial penalty. However, let’s pretend all of the decisions he’s made weren’t driven by a bias conscious or unconscious, you want to avoid even the mere appearance and possibility of non-impartiality. It’s literally written into basically every legal system in the world when it comes to judges and jurors.

          6. ps – Frankly, I find it amazing you even had to be filled in about Herbert. Your interest in F1 seems casual at best. But I guess your vague accusations that I’m just making things up are good enough for you.

          7. @DaveTheChicken

            What is wrong with Herbert? Can you give a specific example where he treated a driver differently based.on their nationality or just vague accusations?

            My best guess is that what they find to be wrong with Herbert, or Warwick, is that he has a British passport.
            In this instance, it seems Warwick failed to outvote the other three and apply a “fair play” judgement.

          8. Davethechicken
            8th December 2024, 14:19

            Spartacus, just vague accusations then and you allege bias but can’t provide any evidence of it.
            He criticised Max so you accuse him of bias?

        2. I have nothing against Warwick. Herbert is an obvious conflict of interest. But keep putting your head in the sand and trying to twist the argument, which is not that “Brits = bad,” but that British drivers have been treated differently and that stewards are human beings just like the rest of us and that thousands of studies have shown we are incredibly pre-disposed to be biased favorably toward those who are the most familiar to us. A steward could have 100% pure intentions and still be unconsciously biased. I’d say the same if stewards were disproportionately German, Spanish or Italian, especially if one of them was a former driver who had a long running public feud with one or more drivers currently on the grid.

          1. Davethechicken
            8th December 2024, 14:45

            But you are specifically accusing British stewards of bias. Giving examples of penalties they give isn’t bias, it is doing their job. Provide an example of a time they treated a British driver differently, then we can discuss, but right now it seems your accusations are based on your own bias in support of Alonso and Max.
            Ps I am not from Britain before you accuse me of being bias….

  8. Coventry Climax
    7th December 2024, 15:57

    And the FiA testing their new software for deleting and reïnstating laptimes for next year?

    Don’t know what’s worse, the possibility of having a laptime deleted late, and no time left to do better, or being found guilty prematurely, to then be proven innocent after all.

    Any news on them using “hawkeye” already? Until then, somehow, they manage to make it an FiA farce either way.

    1. Agreed. If the are not sure they should no drop a lap. The implications for a driver are great. Like using another set trying to qualify unneeded.
      Deleted/reinstated not good.

      1. @Osnola

        If they are not sure, they should not drop a lap

        Spend the rest of the session investigating if need be, but as you say this deleted/oh, no it isn’t performance should not happen – unless they want to turn it into a pantomime.

        @ Coventry Climax

        Any news on them using “hawkeye” already?

        They were touting the idea of “AI”
        Not sure why they want the Artificial Stupidity factor in there, as there seems to more than enough of the genuine version in active use.

        Just draw a line round the corner that they may not even touch (just outside the average driving line for the outside wheels seems reasonable) and then sensors in the line that detect contact.
        “Beep” – your lap is toast, next customer please.

  9. Doohan’s second lap is interesting because he barely lost half a tenth to Gasly in the second half of the track. He lost one tenth in the pit straight even before braking for T1 (so maybe he screwed up the last corner in his outlap), another tenth through turn 1, 0.15s at turn 5 (with some extra time lost in the straight because of a bad exit), another 0.15s through turns 6 and 7. Then he nails the rest of the lap.

    Not a terrible job considering it’s his first race and Gasly has been quite fast the last few GPs.

    1. And he did well in the afterthought that is Ocon’s chassis. I say this as someone who despises Ocon. The worst teammate in F1 history.

      1. I say this as someone who despises Ocon.

        You might be slightly biased, then?

        The worst teammate in F1 history.

        I was rather predicting the PG/EO pairing doing a good job of both vying for that title, but I think PG may have edged it.

        1. Exactly. As someone who is biased against Ocon, I have no motivation to give him credit for doing as well as he did against PG in an unfavorable situation.

          1. Oh, the worst teammate in history bit. That’s why I came to despise him. I used to be his fan and got sick of him being such a terrible teammate. Look up the video by Yelistener “Ocon being the worst teammate in history.”

            Also, Ocon is literally famous / known for being a teammate. So, this isn’t some unique view.

  10. Before Turn 2, it will be PIA SAI NOR. That’s the way it will go.

  11. Max was very fast, but his Q3 was a mess.
    He’ll probably finish P2 or P3 still, who knows, even a win is possible. Red Bull is back.

    1. Max was very fast, but his Q3 was a mess.

      Well, someone seems to have moved the difficult to pass Hulkenberg out of his way. How fortunate.

Comments are closed.