Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari, Shanghai International Circuit, 2025

Hamilton pips Verstappen to take pole for Ferrari in Shanghai sprint race

Formula 1

Posted on

| Written by

Lewis Hamilton claimed a pole position in his second appearance as a Ferrari driver, for the sprint race in Shanghai.

McLaren failed to capitalise on the performance they showed in practice as Max Verstappen claimed second on the grid, just 18 thousandths of a second off Hamilton.

SQ1

Liam Lawson’s tough graduation to Red Bull’s main Formula 1 team continued as he was eliminated in the first round of qualifying for the sprint race. “I’m sorry, I could not get the tyres down,” he told his team after struggling with high tyre temperatures.

Both Alpine drivers also dropped out in the first round. Jack Doohan lost one lap time due to a track limits infringement, yet still managed to out-qualify Pierre Gasly.

Nico Hulkenberg was stunned to learn he’d failed to progress after finishing the session in 19th place. “What?” he exclaimed on his radio. “Oh my god…”

Oliver Bearman brought some cheer to Haas by taking his VF-25 into the second round. Esteban Ocon did his best to follow him, but an error at the final corner left him 18th.

The McLaren drivers set strong laps early in the session but a late flying effort from Hamilton put the Ferrari driver on top. The stewards examined potential impeding incidents involving George Russell, Lance Stroll and Yuki Tsunoda but elected to take no action.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ1 result

P. # Driver Team Model Time Gap
1 44 Lewis Hamilton Ferrari SF-25 1’31.212
2 4 Lando Norris McLaren-Mercedes MCL39 1’31.396 0.184
3 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari SF-25 1’31.518 0.306
4 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren-Mercedes MCL39 1’31.723 0.511
5 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB21 1’31.916 0.704
6 63 George Russell Mercedes W16 1’31.952 0.740
7 12 Andrea Kimi Antonelli Mercedes W16 1’31.999 0.787
8 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR25 1’32.121 0.909
9 6 Isack Hadjar Racing Bulls-Honda RBPT 02 1’32.171 0.959
10 87 Oliver Bearman Haas-Ferrari VF-25 1’32.269 1.057
11 22 Yuki Tsunoda Racing Bulls-Honda RBPT 02 1’32.316 1.104
12 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR25 1’32.327 1.115
13 55 Carlos Sainz Jnr Williams-Mercedes FW47 1’32.457 1.245
14 23 Alexander Albon Williams-Mercedes FW47 1’32.462 1.250
15 5 Gabriel Bortoleto Sauber-Ferrari C45 1’32.539 1.327
16 7 Jack Doohan Alpine-Renault A525 1’32.575 1.363
17 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine-Renault A525 1’32.640 1.428
18 31 Esteban Ocon Haas-Ferrari VF-25 1’32.651 1.439
19 27 Nico Hulkenberg Sauber-Ferrari C45 1’32.675 1.463
20 30 Liam Lawson Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB21 1’32.729 1.517

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ2

Mercedes played a risky game in the second round of qualifying, leaving it until the dying moments for Antonelli and Russell to set their final flying laps. The pair delivered clean laps, however, and secured their progression to the final round with places in the top five.

Those late improvements were bad news for Oliver Bearman, who briefly got his Haas into the top 10, and Alonso, who delivered a strong lap for second earlier in the session. Both found themselves eliminated, Alonso suffering a rare defeat to team mate Lance Stroll, who reached SQ3.

Isack Hadjar made a mistake at the beginning of his final lap, but showed great presence of mind by staying ahead of his team mate and giving him a useful tow down the back straight. That likely made the difference for Tsunoda, who made the cut for the next round by less than three-hundredths of a second.

Alexander Albon went through in seventh while Sainz failed to make the cut. Bortoleto also went no further after his strong performance in SQ1.

Both Ferrari drivers made it through but there was some discontent on Leclerc’s part when he was told to let Hamilton through at one stage. “I’ll do it but we’ve never done that,” he told race engineer Bryan Bozzi, “and I’m a bit in the shit here.”

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ2 result

P. # Driver Team Model Time Gap
1 4 Lando Norris McLaren-Mercedes MCL39 1’31.174
2 63 George Russell Mercedes W16 1’31.346 0.172
3 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren-Mercedes MCL39 1’31.362 0.188
4 44 Lewis Hamilton Ferrari SF-25 1’31.384 0.210
5 12 Andrea Kimi Antonelli Mercedes W16 1’31.475 0.301
6 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB21 1’31.521 0.347
7 23 Alexander Albon Williams-Mercedes FW47 1’31.539 0.365
8 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari SF-25 1’31.561 0.387
9 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR25 1’31.742 0.568
10 22 Yuki Tsunoda Racing Bulls-Honda RBPT 02 1’31.794 0.620
11 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR25 1’31.815 0.641
12 87 Oliver Bearman Haas-Ferrari VF-25 1’31.978 0.804
13 55 Carlos Sainz Jnr Williams-Mercedes FW47 1’32.325 1.151
14 5 Gabriel Bortoleto Sauber-Ferrari C45 1’32.564 1.390
15 6 Isack Hadjar Racing Bulls-Honda RBPT 02 No time

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ3

McLaren had looked the hot favourites for pole position in Shanghai but stumbled at the final hurdle.

The team sent the drivers out for two runs on the soft tyres. Piastri’s first effort was solid enough for provisional pole position, but Norris fell short. While Piastri couldn’t improve on his final effort, Norris set the fastest first sector time of any driver, but ran well wide at the turn 14 hairpin and aborted his run.

That left the round one winner only sixth. Hamilton took full advantage, posting a 1’30.849 to claim pole position. Red Bull left Verstappen’s sole run to the very end and he exploited the improving track conditions superbly, coming within two hundredths of a second of snatching pole away from Hamilton. But it was enough to clear the front row of McLarens, leaving Piastri third.

Leclerc took fourth ahead of Russell, bumping Norris back to sixth. Antonelli claimed seventh while Tsunoda came out ahead in the midfield scrap ahead of Albon, much as he had done in Melbourne, with Stroll 10th.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ3 result

P. # Driver Team Model Time Gap
1 44 Lewis Hamilton Ferrari SF-25 1’30.849
2 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull-Honda RBPT RB21 1’30.867 0.018
3 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren-Mercedes MCL39 1’30.929 0.080
4 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari SF-25 1’31.057 0.208
5 63 George Russell Mercedes W16 1’31.169 0.320
6 4 Lando Norris McLaren-Mercedes MCL39 1’31.393 0.544
7 12 Andrea Kimi Antonelli Mercedes W16 1’31.738 0.889
8 22 Yuki Tsunoda Racing Bulls-Honda RBPT 02 1’31.773 0.924
9 23 Alexander Albon Williams-Mercedes FW47 1’31.852 1.003
10 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin-Mercedes AMR25 1’31.982 1.133

Go ad-free for just £1 per month

>> Find out more and sign up

Miss nothing from RaceFans

Get a daily email with all our latest stories - and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:

2025 Chinese Grand Prix

Browse all 2025 Chinese Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

103 comments on “Hamilton pips Verstappen to take pole for Ferrari in Shanghai sprint race”

  1. Somewhere in the sky there is a huge dumpster ablaze with all the predictions of imminent domjnation and doom, based on one GP last week. Including Norris’s ‘clear favourites’ comment.

    1. Somewhat true, but Lando did make two big mistakes on both laps. He was 0.6 slower than. Piastri in the final sector so once he gets that sorted he’ll be right at the front.

      1. Yeah well done Ferrari. They qualified 6th & 7th this time last year, so it all bodes well.

        That said, this was all about qualifying. I doubt they have the car set up for optimal race performance, so we will see.
        There again you only need one red car for them to be able to change the car’s set up.

        1. You know they can change the set up of the car for sunday now.

      2. Yeah, I would say it does show that McLaren do have the best car, and ARE the favourites. But it’s close enough that there is pressure and we’ve seen getting the tyres right makes 4 tenths of difference today so execution is key. Hamilton and Max got it right, Piastri was not quite there and Norris made critical mistakes when it mattered.

        Will be interesting, because it’s quite possible that the McLarens will be faster on race pace from about halfway through. But they still need to get by and passing both Max AND Lewis will not be easy for Piastri, Norris is unlikely to even get to them, I guess.

      3. He’s trying to get that sorted from Miami last year. The predictions on Norris remain the same, as well as his unforced errors.

    2. I think that might be looking at the final results ignoring the underlying details. McLaren ended up 3rd on a ramping track after setting a time within a 100th of a second of pole while carrying 2 out laps and 2 push laps of fuel. Even their second push lap on hot tyres was still competitive. Pretty sure they still have a clear advantage, with the extended drs zone and better tyre wear I still expect them to be 1, 2.

      1. Maybe so, I’m just saying it’s far too early to be so definitive (as many have been) about either car performance for the year or driver form. Last year Red Bull collapsed fairly spectacularly, albeit not early enough for MV to lose his advantage from the opening races. I still expect this year to be close, not a McLaren walkover.

      2. Agreed. If I understand what happened correctly, McLaren were the only team to go for two hot laps and that (as demonstrated by Red Bull) was not the optimal approach.

    3. Somewhere in the sky there is a huge dumpster ablaze with all the predictions of imminent domjnation and doom, based on one GP last week.

      I would not be surprised if they are able to extinguish that fire by tomorrow and salvage most of its content.

      PS Lawson might be the next driver on that dumpster truck.

    4. Coventry Climax
      21st March 2025, 18:25

      The biggest prediction, as far as I know, is that Norris might win a championship if he manages to eliminate his mistakes and ups his racecraft.
      That one still stands, methinks.

      Qualifying is largely about the driver. For the race other aspects such as car performance and strategy have their share, and the car performance could still help him for the race and take a bit of pressure away from him so he’s less prone to mistakes and less in need of racecraft.

  2. He looked like 2020 Lewis out there today.

    1. Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished. / Laozi

  3. McLaren did 2 push laps so 1st lap had more fuel and track nit as good so when track was optimum and they had the same fuel they had more worn tyres. Fine margins. Great a Ferrari is on pole but will be hard to maintain tbat in the sprint race and quali proper will likely be different. In the end I expect McLaren will be very strong for the rest of the weekend and get more points than any other team.

  4. The Red Bull 2nd seat is like the Manchester United managerial position. You would think it couldn’t get worse with the next one, but it does.

    1. If that happens repeatedly it’s not the quality of the drivers, it’s the quality of the management.
      The issue is that they are still near the front with Max so why change anything if it is working for them?
      Result is they are consistently burning drivers’ careers.
      I would rebrand the Team as Red Max, as he is the only one who can win with their cars.

    2. I reckon the RB is a way more difficult car than we all think and Max is able to extract out of it despite, but the others just can’t. But to me the bigger story is Lewis’ success. What a stellar achievement and how nice for the championship!

    3. I guess the car is way more difficult to drive than we all think. Max just extracts everything from it and is quite good at driving around challenges. But the bigger story today is the stellar performance of Lewis! How nice and how good for the championship, although I fear the McLarens weren’t there because of small driver mistakes.

      1. No asymmetric braking to help him round the corners. ;0)

      2. I guess the car is way more difficult to drive than we all think.

        That’s the exact opposite of what Max is saying – he reckons it’s easier to drive than last year’s car.

        1. I think it’s becoming more and more apparent that Max likes his car (and therefore, Lawson’s car) to handle in a very specific way. It allows him to extract more time from it but it makes life very difficult for the guy in the 2nd car.

          For the guy in the 2nd Red Bull, it’s like being right handed but having to play with left handed golf clubs.

      3. The red bull being tricky to drive is a trope. Every car is tricky to drive. I think its more a case of him being paired with rookies and an aging midfielder in Perez. I also believe that Max having always been the the clear no 1 driver gets to have the car more to his liking. No doubt he is a great fast and adaptable driver but the way he drives isn’t suited to most drivers and requires a lot of confidence. I

    4. Haha yep 100% . Equally Lawson must’ve thought he was signing For Man Utd only to find out it was the one after Alex Ferguson left

    5. @f1mre I’ll take your word for it!

  5. I guess Lewis’ championship hopes aren’t over very soon, but what an unexpected outcome.
    Red Bull perhaps should’ve promoted Yuki, after all, but honestly, dead last in top-team machinery, with both VCARBs again progressing into Q2.
    Doohan was faster than Gasly, so bad news again for Flav, & Bortoleto was again the faster Sauber driver, & Ollie was the faster Haas driver for a change, but standard qualifying could be a different story.

    1. Red Bull perhaps should’ve promoted Yuki, after all, but honestly, dead last in top-team machinery, with both VCARBs again progressing into Q2.

      @jerejj concerning performance to be sure, but it’s still very early days. I’m hoping for his sake that it’s just a case of not having gotten the tyres in the right window, and that we see a significant upturn in form soon.

      1. @3dom I also hope for that.

    2. If Lawson continues at this rate I wouldn’t be surprised if Red Bull swap Yuki and Liam by the end of the year. What have they got to lose?

  6. Possibly not over the hill yet then? People should never write Lewis off too soon. A good performance today. Be great for him and Ferrari if he could repeat it in the main quali. He does seem to relish Shanghai.

    1. I think he’ll struggle to match the pace tomorrow as this was a combination of a great lap from Hamilton and a McLaren error.

      Lando made many mistakes and the strategy of Fast-cool-fast wasn’t the correct one. If McLaren get it right tomorrow then there’s a huge amount of pace for them to find.

      I hope I’m wrong but I feel it’ll be a comfortable 1-2 for McLaren.

      1. Stephen Taylor
        21st March 2025, 9:42

        @erikje But I think the reason they went for double cool in SQ3 was because they had already used an extra set of soft tyres compared to others in practice.

      2. I definitely think McLaren will do better second time around.

      3. There’s no substitute for experience Lewis and Max will get the maximum from their equipment. Lando, Oscar and Charles are still libel to make errors, particularly if under pressure. McLaren are the fastest cars, but ferrari can soon catch up.

      4. Hopefully not, or there won’t be much of a competition this year. If Lando can win from sixth in a sprint, then it’s all over for everyone, including Oscar. Oscar should win tomorrow, but he’ll need to get clear of Max and Lewis early and build a gap in case Lando gets loose.

        The hope for the other teams is if what Lando was saying is correct and the car is too hard to handle on this track. In that case we might see that, over a race distance, the drivers simply can’t put consistently fast laps in (and perhaps the McLaren “mistakes” were due to poor drivability of the car).

        I’m not sure what will happen with Lewis and Max, and whether they’ll be able to keep Oscar behind. I’ll guess that they won’t feel the need to work together! We might need maximum Lewis and Maximum Max this year to stop the season becoming a McLaren whitewash.

    2. McLaren will finish tomorrow and Sunday 1&2 if it’s an straight forward race. And they will win by a big margin.

      What we saw earlier is 2 amazing drivers LH and MV performing at their best and McLaren bottle their quali. In the case of lando twice.

    3. does seem to relish Shanghai

      There used to be a very small gravel tap by the pit lane entrance. Great memories. Hallowed ground.

      1. There used to be a very small gravel tap by the pit lane entrance.

        “…what doesn’t kill me, makes me stronger” /Nietzsche

  7. Now this is a headline that’ll get me to watch a qualifying Highlights.

    Good stuff.

    1. Surprised you don’t watch full sessions, especially when there’s good competition\stuff going on, the only time I intended to watch highlights only because I was tired of merc domination was monza 2020, then I saw some catchy headline and ended up watching that too (was when gasly won with toro rosso).

      1. I don’t care for the format and its coverage, so the the onboard pole lap is usually good enough for me.

        But whatever the case, I wanted to get a sense of the vibe and was pleased by the enthusiasm among commentators and fans alike. Vettel was right that everyone is a Ferrari fan.

        1. Coventry Climax
          21st March 2025, 18:35

          Sorry to say Vettel was wrong then.

  8. I see Hamilton is washed and should retire immediately. :-)

    1. LOL. Still life in the ol bulldog ;0)

  9. Most F1 Championships ever on the front row of the grid – 11 championships.

    Previous record was 9 championships in 2023 at the Hungaroring with also Lewis (7) and Max (then 2) on the front row.

    1. Nice stats @f1statsfan

  10. I don’t think Max crashed into a Ferrari since Kimi left

    1. Might be right. Mostly thanks to Leclerc jumping out of his way numerous times (which he shouldn’t do).

      1. Although it was mostly with vettel he crashed.

        1. The one I’m thinking of (probably @mrboerns too) Max was an innocent sandwich filler between two red cars…

          1. That was a crazy one. I still have clear memories of that. That was worse than the rosberg and ham in Spain.

        2. Coventry Climax
          21st March 2025, 18:38

          That sounds like it was never Vettel’s fault, where Vettel was famously known for being unable to correctly estimate the length of his car.

      2. MichaelN,
        I have to agree with you. At times, Leclerc has been a bit too soft on Verstappen, but apart from Hamilton, he’s the only driver who can truly go toe to toe with Max in wheel to wheel battles. This year, Ferrari can really rattle Verstappen, they just need to get their strategy in order. Vasseur must give Leclerc a clear directive: race Verstappen as aggressively as the rules allow. As for Hamilton… Well no one needs to tell him anything…

        1. Leclerc knows how to race properly (or as you call it: hard), If not ask Checo.

          People complain all the time about Drs…but the moment people do proper racing, you see then crying foul.

  11. Well done, Lewis. To be honest.. It’s the only champion who can compete with the other champion, Max.. true rivals. Looking forward (and hoping) to the returning competition between these two on the race track… and of course on this forum. This is what we all want en hope to see, back to the neverending discussions on race incidents, let’s race!

    1. This track drew heavily on experience and seat-of-the-pants feeling.

      Ferrari has a great car, they just need to match it with great strategy.

      1. No strategy needed in a sprint race though.

        1. Which is a fortunate bonus for Ferrari – a sad truth.

    2. Michael (@freelittlebirds)
      21st March 2025, 14:47

      It’s the only champion who can compete with the other champion,

      The wheel-to-wheel racing under pressure between those two couldn’t be any different as are their racing philosophies. If Hamilton did what Max did he would have 10+ championships but he’d be half the champion he is.

      How you win matters.

      1. comment of the day here

      2. Tell that to Nico Rosberg and Fernando Alonso to see if they agree with you about how Lewis drove

        1. Coventry Climax
          21st March 2025, 18:40

          Or Albon, or .. so many others.

          1. Exactly. The reality is that every great driver has done this since Fangio, Clark, Senna, Schumacher, Hamilton, Verstappen, etc. And future ones will have to. That is the nature of the game.

            Others have been able to get a championship mainly because their car/team helped them a lot. Like Damon Hill, Button, etc.

    3. I’m rooting for both Lewis and Max in this one. Man against machine. Like in those seasons when Schumacher had to beat those self-driving cars on foot!

  12. The signs were there last weekend that Hamilton is getting the feel of the car, not in the overall race speed but in his handling of the car on slicks on a wet surface while others were sliding. Somehow missed by lots of commenters eager to see his demise.

    1. Agreed @david-br. He seems to have settled in well so far given the limited data points that we have. This seems like a very impressive performance to be on a similar level to (and on this occasion, beating) Leclerc this early on. Obviously early days, but an early suggestion that it’s premature to be saying that he’s lost speed

    2. Yes, for example he tended to get closer as quali progressed (talking about australia).

  13. What a difference a week makes!

    It’s great to see a close contest at the top.

  14. I heard that he wasn’t fast anymore…

    1. @3dom

      That Ferrari is a rocketship! ;-)

  15. And again the Sprint weekend is delivering.
    People might not like the Sprint concept (or any change), but the reduced FP opportunities always deliver smaller or bigger surprises.

    1. Very debatable.

      1. It’s indeed what happened relatively often so far, we’ve had quite a few sprint weekends by now.

        1. you can get such surprises from normal race weekends, crediting sprint weekends with this is pretty disingenuous.

          1. Only Sprint weekends give (guaranteed) less FP; and that’s one of the main drivers for the more exciting events (quali and races).

            And don’t worry; you will not be accused of being disingenuous if you agree with this statement and still passionately oppose the concept of Sprint events ;)

    2. Yes, I agree – sprint quali is often less predictable than the full race quali, and the shorter races gives some of those with higher-than-expected placements a fighting chance of holding on to them.

      1. I don’t see any evidence that sprints create more unexpected results or mix up the field in qualifying or the race. The theory that lack of practice will wrong-foot big teams hasn’t played out. Just look at the fact that until today Verstappen took pole for half of all sprint races. And the team to take him under 50 percent is Ferrari.

    3. Coventry Climax
      21st March 2025, 18:52

      You know what would produce really surprising races?

      Teams having to build their cars in isolation, so without any input from their drivers, as they won’t be appointed to teams until 5 minutes before a race. Having rookies do the free practice and qualifying, but blindly, so they do not know whose car they’re actually driving and rotate them over the teams during the season by rolling a pair of dice. Then have the real drivers do the sunday race, based on another rolling of the dice session, and yet another to determine the starting order. Oh, and random sprinklers ofcourse, let’s not forget those.

      Now tell me two things please:
      1: What is the definition of ‘delivering’
      2: how does ‘surprise’ relate to having that ‘delivering’ format.

      1. 1: What is the definition of ‘delivering’
        2: how does ‘surprise’ relate to having that ‘delivering’ format.

        1. Pizza has arrived
        2. Some of them have pineapple in the topping :(

  16. I’ve been one of his biggest critics, but that was impressive from Hamilton. To be in the mix on pace so early in the weekend is a complete turnaround from Australia.

    Maybe McLaren blew it but that is on them. Lewis was strong throughout the session

    1. True, even before q3 he was outperforming leclerc.

    2. Michael (@freelittlebirds)
      21st March 2025, 14:44

      I take it you’re also a huge Roger Feder, Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic, Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Michael Phelps, and Usain Bolt critic. It happens… :-)

      1. @freelittlebirds That made me chuckle!

  17. Oldest pole-sitter (albeit Sprint) since Mansell at Adelaide in 1994.

    I think also 6th oldest in history?

    1. David West, as you note, whilst it is with the caveat that it is a sprint race, rather than the main race, it is indeed the case that Hamilton is the oldest driver to be on pole since Mansell in 1994. Additionally, yes, that would make Hamilton the sixth oldest driver to be on pole position for a race.

    2. You are right if this was actually a pole qualifying. Yet, this won’t go in the books as such.

      Likely this year though.

      1. If so, he’ll be even older :)

  18. Hamilton was faster than Leclerc this whole session. This is a first.
    But the fastest guy out there is Norris. He messed up his first attempt and aborted the second because a Sprint is worth nothing anyway, it would be a different story if it were a qualy for the real race.

    1. He aborted the second attempt because he messed it up too. Very Lando Norris of him, but still, lots of pace advantage over the field to finish on the podium in sprint and fight for the win in the real race.

    2. Had Lando not Bottled either of his attempts, especially the second, he would have gotten pole by at least .025 over any other driver

      1. You probably meant .25, cause .025 ain’t much.

        1. Apologies. That is what I meant. Good catch

  19. What’s the odds on Christian and Hellmut calling up Perez halfway through the year?

    1. What’s the odds on Christian and Hellmut calling up Perez halfway through the year?

      Best let Christian do the dialling, Helmut would likely enter a South American dialling code ;)

    2. Ahah, would be embarrassing to ask perez after they had to pay him to leave and after his performance; perhaps would make more sense to try ricciardo, since his underperformances lately were at toro rosso, and at red bull he did fine when testing, and was ofc the strongest team mate verstappen had at red bull.

    3. Hmm… I had thought last year that Red Bull didn’t find any potential Pérez replacement convincing. They should have stuck with him. He might be struggling to get into the top ten, but he’d do as good as his replacements and bring bags of money for the team.

      1. That said, Lawson needs some time. If he can’t show something within six races, they could send him back to RB, bring in Pérez and fire Yuki. That would generate even more venom from the anti-Red Bull crowd. They probably can’t do it due to some contract with Honda. Yuki is doing a good job, of course, but he’s still a Honda driver.

  20. Lando the team orders Babe.
    Piastri really needs to bag this one

  21. Welcome Charles to your team mate Lewis….this will just be the start of being dominated

    1. Coventry Climax
      21st March 2025, 18:56

      And Ferrari lending a helping hand in the matter, obviously.

      1. He wasn’t happy with the swap. Had me think of all the times he said he was excited to be working with Lewis and that they got on well together. These things can happen when your new team mate is one of the best.

        In fairness to Lewis, I don’t think the swap is what made the difference. It was his driving. Charles squirmed in the interview and brought up the fact that he struggled here last year, too. Unfortunately, this is a clear comparison of Lewis and Charles as drivers. Leclerc will need to do better.

  22. Norris still the favourite when Lawson causes a red flag.

    1. Indeed, when, not if!

Comments are closed.