Start, Red Bull Ring, 2025

2025 Austrian Grand Prix weekend F1 driver ratings

Formula 1

Posted on

| Written by

The McLaren drivers had things all their way at Red Bull’s home track.

But while the MCL39 drivers put on an engrossing scrap for the lead, several of their pursuers produced performances which were no less impressive. Others were just downright cursed.

Here’s RaceFans’ verdict on the full field in the Austrian Grand Prix.

Lando Norris

Lando Norris, McLaren, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 1st (2 places ahead of team mate, -0.583s)
Start: Held position
Strategy: Two-stop (M-H-M)
Finished: 1st (1 place ahead of team mate)

▶ Missed FP1 as Alex Dunne drove his car but was immediately on the pace
One of his best qualifying performances for a while
Kept his lead at the start and resisted Piastri, calmly re-passing him
Went off at the last two corners under pressure from Piastri
▶ Kept up his pace and navigated traffic effectively to keep out of reach of Piastri

8/10: Great in qualifying and handles Piastri well in the race

Oscar Piastri

Qualified: 3rd (2 places behind team mate, +0.583s)
Start: +1 place
Strategy: Two-stop (M-H-M)
Finished: 2nd (1 place behind team mate)

▶ Not quite on Norris’s pace but final attempt to beat him in Q3 was thwarted by yellow flags
Immediately passed Leclerc at the start
▶ Tested Norris’s defences several times but almost hit him once
▶ Opted to extend first stint hoping for a tyre advantage later
▶ Lost time when Colapinto forced him off

7/10: Had the pace and opportunities to pass Norris but couldn’t make it stick

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Charles Leclerc

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 2nd (2 places ahead of team mate, -0.09s)
Start: -1 place
Strategy: Two-stop (M-H-M)
Finished: 3rd (1 place ahead of team mate)

▶ Sat out FP1 as Dino Begnovic drove his car
Capitalised on Ferrari’s upgrade and Piastri’s misfortune to take second on the grid
▶ Couldn’t keep Piastri behind at the start and then had a lonely race to third

8/10: Strong weekend after sitting out first practice

Lewis Hamilton

Qualified: 4th (2 places behind team mate, +0.09s)
Start: Held position
Strategy: Two-stop (M-H-M)
Finished: 4th (1 place behind team mate)

▼ Received a warning for impeding in second practice
▶ Closer to Leclerc’s pace in qualifying than usual
▶ Swatted Russell away at the start of the race
▶ Pace dropped on hard tyres so the one-stop he lobbied for wasn’t going to work

7/10: Looked like another step forward as he adjusts to Ferrari’s car

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Max Verstappen

Qualified: 7th (11 places ahead of team mate, -0.263s)
Finished: Not classified

▶ Only two-tenths off the McLarens in final practice but slipped back in qualifying and foiled by yellow flag
▶ Blamelessly taken out by Antonelli

7/10: A particularly difficult weekend to rate as everything went against him

Yuki Tsunoda

Yuki Tsunoda, Red Bull, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 18th (11 places behind team mate, +0.263s)
Start: +3 places
Strategy: Three-stop (M-H-M-S)
Finished: 16th

Closer to Verstappen than ever in terms of lap time but couldn’t avoid Q1 elimination
▶ Passed Stroll but hit him, avoiding a penalty
Made heavier contact with Colapinto, received a penalty and had to replace his front wing
Finished two laps down in last place

2/10: Qualifying wasn’t quite as bad as it looked but his race was

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Andrea Kimi Antonelli

Qualified: 9th (4 places behind team mate, +0.192s)
Finished: Not classified

▶ Denied a chance to start his final lap in Q3 due to traffic
Crashed into Verstappen at the start, putting both out.

4/10: Unlucky in qualifying but first lap mistake was serious

George Russell

George Russell, Mercedes, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 5th (4 places ahead of team mate, -0.192s)
Start: Held position
Strategy: Two-stop (M-M-H)
Finished: 5th

▶ Fifth on the grid was likely the best available as his Mercedes dislikes high temperatures
▶ Never looked like he had the pace to run in the top four
Passed Lawson and Alonso for fifth

7/10: Finishing a minute behind reflected more on the car than the driver

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Lance Stroll

Qualified: 16th (5 places behind team mate, +0.132s)
Start: +3 places
Strategy: Two-stop (M-H-S)
Finished: 14th (7 places behind team mate)

Eliminated in Q1 again
▶ Lost a place to Tsunoda
Did not have good pace in his first stint
Any hope of one-stopping ended when his hard tyres went off in his second stint

4/10: Seemed to take too much out of his tyres early in second stint

Fernando Alonso

Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 11th (5 places ahead of team mate, -0.132s)
Start: +1 place
Strategy: One-stop (M-H)
Finished: 7th (7 places ahead of team mate)

▶ Narrowly failed to make the cut for Q3
▶ Ran a long opening stint on mediums
Introduced his hard tyres carefully and ran a consistent stint on them
Came under severe pressure from Bortoleto at the end but held on for seventh

9/10: Appeared to maximise what the Aston Martin could do

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Franco Colapinto

Qualified: 14th (4 places behind team mate, +0.442s)
Start: +3 places
Strategy: Two-stop (S-M-H)
Finished: 15th (2 places behind team mate)

Reached Q2 but admitted a mistake at turn three problem stopped him getting further
Passed early on by Bearman
Showed poor awareness by forcing Piastri off while being lapped
▶ Said his car handled less well after Tsunoda knocked him into a spin

4/10: Both victim and culprit at times

Pierre Gasly

Pierre Gasly, Alpine, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 10th (4 places ahead of team mate, -0.442s)
Start: +4 places
Strategy: Two-stop (S-H-M)
Finished: 13th (2 places ahead of team mate)

Missed out on a higher grid position in Q3 by over-committing at final corner
▶ Took advantage of Verstappen-Antonelli collision to grab sixth at the start
Seemed to lack pace whichever tyre he was on
Passed by Albon in his first stint and the Haas pair in his second as he fell to 13th

6/10: Put his car in a competitive position but couldn’t capitalise

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Esteban Ocon

Esteban Ocon, Haas, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 17th (2 places behind team mate, +0.146s)
Start: +3 places
Strategy: Two-stop (M-H-H)
Finished: 10th (1 place ahead of team mate)

▶ Felt he was unable to improve in the final corners after going out in Q1
Important first-stint pass on Stroll bought him clear air
Passed the Alpine drivers in his second stint
▶ Ran out of time to catch Hulkenberg but claimed final point

7/10: Delivered in the race after qualifying disappointment

Oliver Bearman

Qualified: 15th (2 places ahead of team mate, -0.146s)
Start: +3 places
Strategy: Two-stop (S-H-M)
Finished: 11th (1 place behind team mate)

Got more out of the Haas in qualifying than his team mate to reach Q2
Started on softs and passed Colapinto on the same tyres
Struggled in middle stint on hards and had to pit early
Did better on the mediums and passed Hadjar but his points chance was lost

6/10: One weak stint in the race allowed his team mate to overhaul him

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Isack Hadjar

Qualified: 13th (7 places behind team mate, +0.185s)
Start: -3 places
Strategy: Two-stop (S-M-H)
Finished: 12th (6 places behind team mate)

Found it hard to improve his time in Q2 so missed the cut for the top 10
▶ Got rid of his soft tyres under the Safety car for virtual one-stop strategy
His pace on the hard tyres went off earlier than Lawson’s and he was passed by the Sauber and Haas drivers

6/10: Behind his team mate this weekend for once

Liam Lawson

Liam Lawson, Racing Bulls, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 6th (7 places ahead of team mate, -0.185s)
Start: -3 places
Strategy: One-stop (M-H)
Finished: 6th (6 places ahead of team mate)

Took an excellent sixth In qualifying after beating team mate to Q3
▶ Bortoleto passed him at the start, Gasly and Albon also got ahead due to the turn three incident
Kept Alonso behind in his second stint

8/10: The kind of result he’s been crying out for

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Alexander Albon

Alexander Albon, Williams, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 12th (7 places ahead of team mate, -0.439s)
Start: +5 places
Strategy: One-stop (M-M)
Finished: Not classified

Reached Q3 despite floor damage
▶ Gained five places at the start largely due to the mess at turn three
▶ Passed Gasly when the Alpine driver’s tyres start to fade
▶ Retired with a technical problem shortly after his first pit stop

7/10: Did the best he could in qualifying, out of luck in the race

Carlos Sainz Jnr

Qualified: 19th (7 places behind team mate, +0.439s)
Finished: Not classified

▶ Picked up floor damage in qualifying and was unable to progress beyond Q1.
▶ Failed to take the start due to a technical problem.

6/10: His race was even more of a non-event than Verstappen’s

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Nico Hulkenberg

Qualified: 20th (12 places behind team mate, +0.483s)
Start: +3 places
Strategy: Two-stop (S-M-M)
Finished: 9th (1 place behind team mate)

Had the pace to get out of Q1 but admitted he made a mistake
▶ Pitted early which gained him places on Colaptino, Albon and Tsunoda
Passed Bearman and Gasly which bought him valuable clear air for his second stint
Lost no time passing Hadjar in his second stint as he out-ran Ocon for ninth

8/10: Made amends for qualifying slip with excellent recovery drive

Gabriel Bortoleto

Gabriel Bortoleto, Sauber, Red Bull Ring, 2025

Qualified: 8th (12 places ahead of team mate, -0.483s)
Start: Held position
Strategy: Two-stop (M-M-H)
Finished: 8th (1 place ahead of team mate)

Looked confident from the word go and reached Q3 for the first time
▶ Effectively lost a place due to the collision ahead of him at turn three on lap one
Got past Gasly when he needed to mid-race
▶ Ran a two-stop strategy but couldn’t pass Alonso at the end on his fresher hard tyres

8/10: Great pace all weekend but should have taken seventh off Alonso

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Over to you

Vote for the driver who impressed you most last weekend and find out whether other RaceFans share your view here:

2025 Austrian Grand Prix

Browse all 2025 Austrian Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

57 comments on “2025 Austrian Grand Prix weekend F1 driver ratings”

  1. Most impressed: NOR, LAW, & BOR
    Most disappointing: TSU

  2. I don’t think Russell passing Alonso and Lawson should be a positive when 5th was his position to begin with.

  3. max a 7 after 2 turns but George a 7 for finishing the race?

    1. How would you deal with this kind of a situation, where he couldn’t finish a single lap due to someone else’s fault?
      I wouldn’t rate him at all. But since they insist on doing so, even when there’s nothing to work with, a “neutral” rating like that seems okay, I guess. Not that it really matters at all. No need to take any of this seriously.
      Speaking of Russel, I don’t see finishing a race as an achievement (I’m not saying that he had a poor race, only referring to your argument). If Verstappen DNF’d on his own, that would’ve been a different story.

      1. I’d rate him on his qualifying performance and give him a 5 for the race so in reality a 5 would have been a fair result given his relatively poor qualifying. Getting a 7 for qualifying poorly and completing 100m is ridiculous.

        1. There’s a mark in the middle between those you mentioned, 6: both of those you said can be arguably extreme, as in a 7 is a good mark (not neutral) in this rating system, so can be considered too much, but his qualifying was good, he was the victim of yellow flags.

    2. That is because of the total scores if you give him a zero his average would drop instant as this system doesn’t accept none scores.

      1. Good point, a 7 can be considered neutral in the sense of his yearly average.

    3. Yeah, I would think that based on qualifying a 7/10 would be too high of a rating, so either they should have just not rated him or given maybe a 5-6 for a meh qualifying (sure, he WAS on a faster lap, but then, Leclerc had already done the better job in the first run where Max was unable to do so – that is on his team and on him).

  4. I feel like Keith was in a slightly charitable mood when marking these papers. I tend to agree with the McLaren driver ratings and a few others, but I feel like most are probably 1 or 2 points more generous than I expected.

    1. Agree. -1 for everyone would be fair. Track is not as challenging as others.

      1. The track is very challenging in fact.

        1. It was an attempt in sarcasm i guess.

          1. The ratings look relatively high this weekend for me (across the board), -1 makes sense, I seriously doubt it’s sarcasm; whether the track is more challenging than others is a debate matter.

    2. Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
      30th June 2025, 20:26

      I especially think the Sauber pair should be ranked 2 places lower.

      Hulkenberg seriously underperformed in qualifying. That car was really strong this weekend, and Q3 should have been easy for both in my view.

      Bortoletto just didn’t have the pace in the race in my view; Hulkenberg was just 5 seconds behind despite starting last. The safety car didn’t even aid with this.

      Bortoletto should also have easily been able to pass Alonso. He made the mistake of overtaking into turn 3, and giving Alonso DRS for an easy repass. All he needed to do was lift into turn 3 and then easily get Alonso between here and turn 4. That car had the pace to be 6th today given the circumstances. Bortoletto couldn’t manage as I’ve described, and Hulkenberg had a terrible qualifying given how good that car was this weekend.

      Hulkenberg was actually superb in the race, but qualifying should count much more heavily against him than the scores seem to here.

      We also need to reflect that there were 3 retirements of drivers that very likely would have beaten Bortoletto – meaning he wouldn’t have got points. This also means Hulkenberg also wouldn’t have – because of his mistake in qualifying.

      I think both should have scored a 6.

      1. @thegianthogweed I don’t disagree. In a way Bortoleto’s good qualy showed what the car was capable of, which highlighted Hulk’s poor qualy, and Hulk’s great race highlights just how strong the car was, highlighting Bortoleto’s poor race pace. It was comfortably 5th best car this weekend, so really they should have been where Lawson was.

        The Sauber’s aren’t the only ones arguably overrated though. Alonso was good, and his last lap defence was a highlight, but 9’s are very rare and are the highest grade given out yet, so this didn’t quite seem up there. I thought it was likely a 7, maybe 8 at a push. Verstappen got a 7 despite barely competing in a competitive season with not getting his final Q3 lap in and being taken out of the race. I’d give that a 5. The Ferraris had uneventful races and just finished where they should have with no real competition. Kimi’s 4 seems generous for a pretty egregious first lap error and nothing special in qualifying. Etc etc.

        1. Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
          30th June 2025, 23:21

          Yea you have a point about Verstappen. It is basically guessing what he “may” have archived based on what he usually does. I can’t see a driver like Stroll getting a 7 out of 10 if he has a bit of bad luck in qualifying and then is an innocent victim after a good start.

  5. 9/10 for Alonso. Some heavy weighting going on there!

    1. Yes, there’s that again! Not even Max gets as many high ratings as Alonso!
      But let’s keep it quiet because his supporters soon will come and say we hate him.

      1. Absolutely. Let’s give the race winner, pole sitter and leader of every session he took part in 8/10, but Alonso deserves a 9. Makes total sense

        1. And why not? Where they in the same car?
          It takes only a modicum of competence to win everything when you drive a dominant car. That does not make you the best driver.

      2. Genghis Blond
        1st July 2025, 0:09

        @Edvaldo

        Well, if the shoe fits… Find me a single article about Alonso in the recent past in which there is more than one or two people speaking positively about him. If someone slams Lewis, you’ve got about 30 regular users of which at least five will be around to clap back. If FA is slammed, maybe RBAlonso responds if he happens to be around.

        “His supporters.” Must mean me since he has no supporters here beside me. Meanwhile, you’ve got J765 + HJ3W (or some similar weird letter / number combo)!who only post when there’s an article about Alonso to insult him. This site is packed with Lewis fans which is nice, but it’s no secret they’re not fans of him and guys like Tony who will never praise FA, but are quick to exploit any opportunity to say something negative.

        As for you, you’ve all but admitted you strongly dislike him and/or at minimum consider him a cheater because of 2008 (despite the fact that even the guy who blew the whistle says he didn’t know about the plan) and McLaren despite that being, oh, just 18 years ago.

        As for his rating, you could say 9/10 was on the high side, but it seem the ratings have generally gotten more generous lately. 9/10 was once nearly impossible and 10/10 truly impossible.

        1. And here’s the first one.

          I’m not going to discuss anything other than his generous rating here. The topic is not Alonso, even if you people seem to love to talk about him and crave opportunities to do it whenever you can.

          1. Genghis Blond
            1st July 2025, 0:37

            The first AND only one…

            “..:any opportunity?” That takes some impressive nerve considering:

            -I post less than 3 posts per week

            -You so didn’t want to talk about it that you brought it up in the first place

            Cool gaslighting…

          2. Aren’t we allowed to post anything without expecting it to become a discussion?

            You replied because you wanted to, and i don’t want to discuss Alonso right now. Period.

        2. So it’s a pity score.

          And Lewis gets dragged in and his fans blamed. It’s not even funny anymore, even if it ever was

          1. Genghis Blond
            1st July 2025, 15:04

            “Again” and “not even funny anymore.”

            lol, again, when has this happened before?

            And “it’s a pity score.” Did I give him the score?

            The ultimate irony is you all know it’s the truth and are angry you can’t deny a single thing I said. There’s not a single example of a time any of you have ever said anything about the guy that wasn’t a negative.

            but the “this is crazy I’m not doing it again” argument when it’s literally never happened before is amazing work.

            Anyway, I’m done too. It’s pointless debating such utterly petty people. So, yeah, that old guy is terrible. And what a horrible person too!

        3. Must mean me since he has no supporters here beside me

          Not true, count me on too.

    2. Yep seems too generous. He spent nearly the entire race under a second behind Lawson and couldnt get past. Lawson!… or maybe Lawson was under pressure from Alonso for practically the whole race. And Maybe Lawaon got the RB up higher than the car should. How about Lawson 9/10 and Alonso 8/10.

      1. Genghis Blond
        1st July 2025, 0:15

        He wasn’t trying to. He literally never made a single attempt to pass because he knew he needed to stay in the DRS + keep LL pushing for his strategy to work (stretch his tires as long as possible while keeping up good lap times) to achieve the best possible outcome. And it worked as the RB was faster + fast enough to make the strategy (jumping the two stoppers ahead) work.

        But it was a great driver from Lawson from quali thru the race or the strategy wouldn’t have worked at all. So, LL deserves a 9/10 too despite having a faster car because he’s still a quasi rookie and has been under a lot of pressure.

        1. 3 posts a week huh. How many hours do you consider to be a week ?

          1. Ahah, indeed, I see 3 posts here by him, so he’s not allowed to make another till the 8 july!

          2. Ops, my bad, he said “less than 3”, so he’s already broken the limit. I wonder what penalties there are for users who break the post-count!

          3. Genghis Blond
            1st July 2025, 15:05

            Hilarious. Find any posts I’ve made outside of this thread and the DOTD in the last two weeks.

          4. Genghis Blond, if you are asking other posters to find examples of you posting outside of this thread or the DOTD thread, then we can point out that you are actively posting in the thread about the number of penalty points that Verstappen has.

  6. I strongly disagree with basing the score on 1 overtaking manover less or more.

  7. Verstappen gets a 7 for qualifying 7th

    Alonso gets the highest score lol … how ? Higher than Norris, than Lawson, than the Hulk … how?

    Sainz gets a 6 for a non weekend

    1. Genghis Blond
      1st July 2025, 0:25

      Maybe 9/10 is a point too or LL/GB deserved the same rating, but the people you’re arguing should be as high…really?

      Hulk = blew quali (literally dead last in a faster car), but his race was really good. However, without so many crashes and mechanical failures, he’s likely not recovering from his quali let alone getting to P9.

      Norris = should have got pole and should have won as he had by far the fastest car this weekend. He ran off the road and almost let Piastri get by in his first stint and generally couldn’t break away. Other than impressive quali pace, I don’t see anything remarkable about his weekend. He had to beat one driver and he did that. Is that an automatic 9/10?

      1. Genghis Blond
        1st July 2025, 0:39

        a point too high*

  8. Alonso 9 seems a bit generous. But then trying to unlap himself against the race leader on the last lap was legendary status by itself. Completely oblivious to Norris and Piastri racing for the win, “read the small print! I’m allowed to do this!”

    1. Genghis Blond
      1st July 2025, 0:32

      Your post serves a fine example for my response to Edvaldo. Maybe 9/10 was too generous, but you actually think he was completely oblivious to OP being there or that even if he had pulled over Oscar is making up the gap AND passing Lando in 1/8th of a lap? Get real.

      It’s called race craft, which he displayed in great volume throughout the race. Had it been Lewis, this would never be your take. I’ll give you credit that though, unlike many here, you won’t go out of your way to slam the guy for no reason. But half-a-reason?..

      1. And your post is a great example of completely misreading a comment. I was fine with Alonso trying to unlap himself, it was a great moment.

        1. Genghis Blond
          1st July 2025, 16:38

          I apologize then.

          1. No problem! I get why you may have thought otherwise.

        2. He wasn’t trying to unlap himself, he was using the DRS to protect hi.self from the car behind as he let the McLaren through. He drew alongside because he used the extra speed the DRS gave him then tucked in behind the McLaren.

  9. Piastri – “Not quite on Norris’s pace but final attempt to beat him in Q3 was thwarted by yellow flags” I would argue he was actually faster that Norris and would have been further up the road if he had made the pass stick.

    1. Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
      1st July 2025, 7:58

      @cjm76

      Yea I agree with this. I also think that without him losing out due to the yellows in qualifying, he would have been P2, and with the start he had, I think he would have been able to pass Norris. And I think Norris would have challenged him less than Piastri did to Norris.

      So yea, I also think Piastri looked to have slightly better pace.

    2. Yeh he led every session, qualified on pole and led the race from start to finish but he was slower than Oscar. Better watch out if he does become quicker

  10. Why didn’t Alonso get a 10.5? Mr. Collantine, you’re doing “The Benny Hill Show” with your rating. Do you treat your readers like they’re mentally challenged? You should be directing a cabaret.

  11. Think the main focal point from this week’s ratings is Alonso’s 9/10, and my 5 cents worth is in line with others. Sure a fine drive, but he wasn’t circulating behind LL for 70 laps on 3 wheels. He never attempted an overtake move on LL (yes, there might be reasons why but he did get within 0.3sec), and he didn’t start 20th. I actually rate the guy, so this is in no way a jab at him, more the score afforded. Was it better, or even the same, as Max in rain from p17 to p1 in Sau Paulo? Of course it wasn’t.

    1. I agree, but just to give some context, by checking all ratings this year you will notice that, although no announcement was made, this year the rating system is kinder to drivers, 9 are no longer the super special performances, imo a 9 now is similar to the 8 of last and previous years, other people here noticed it too, there’s been races with multiple 9s now, that wasn’t a thing before.

  12. Last lap by ALO was the stuff of legend, he was DOTW for me. And yes he could have passed LAW but he never wanted to. Blame DRS

    1. Genghis Blond
      1st July 2025, 16:41

      To be fair, I don’t think he could have got past even if he wanted to and I don’t think he could.

      Interestingly, here were his comments on the subject:

      Alonso was within DRS of the Racing Bulls driver for large parts of the Grand Prix and was at one point told by Vizard that he needed to “lift and coast into Turn 4.”

      The 43-year-old replied: “This pace is not real. As soon as I lose the DRS, you will see the real pace. So you decide.”

      He explained to DAZN that he deliberately did not try to attack the New Zealander as he needed the DRS from the Racing Bulls driver to maintain his AMR25’s speed.

      “I never wanted to pass Liam at any point,” Alonso said.

      “I did a race as if it were a time trial on a bicycle. I just had to stay tucked in behind, take advantage of the three DRS straights, and then in the four corners in between push like it was qualifying to get back into the DRS.

      “I think I was about half a second behind Lawson and by staying close to him I was gaining half a second per lap.

      “In fact, they asked me: ‘When do we stop?’ and I replied: ‘When he stops!’ because I didn’t have that kind of pace.

      “I was basically an extension of Lawson and thanks to that, I finished in the points. We didn’t have the pace or strength to go ahead and overtake him.”

      1. That’s just impressive racing insight by alonso, gives more context to the 9 here!

  13. Need to rate race control and stewards each race.

    1. I suppose their ratings would be matching tsunoda’s or verstappen’s team mates then!

  14. I thought race control took too long to abort the start with the SAI issue. And then the fire being put out by pit crew not wearing safety gear.

Comments are closed.