Start, Silverstone, 2019

Second Silverstone race likely to remain in “traditional format”

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: The managing director of Silverstone expects both this year’s races will run in the “traditional format” despite F1’s efforts to experiment with changes for the second events.

Show which drivers and teams you are supporting

Which F1 drivers and teams are you supporting this season? Here's how you can show your support for your favourite on the grid on RaceFans:

  • Log in with your RaceFans account (sign up here if you don't have one)
  • Select Edit My Profile from the top-right menu
  • Select F1 Teams and Drivers
  • Make your selections then click Save Changes

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

Could IndyCar’s Aeroscreen be a better alternative to F1’s Halo?

With regards to F1 though and their discussions about such a thing as an Aeroscreen, I’m assuming it’s not even a consideration anymore. IndyCars are far less aero dependent than F1 cars, and so have only experienced a small change aerodynamically. F1 cars would need to be designed from the ground up for such a thing, and from what I can gather the new generation cars that are coming are not incorporating anything more than a better integrated halo than the bolt-on one they are using now. To me another outstanding big question is that IndyCar, like F1, races in the rain. What will they do for visibility on rainy days?

In general I found the Aeroscreens looking too big for the cars, but didn’t really mind the appearance. Perhaps when they have bigger wings in the back for road and street courses the Aeroscreen will look more proportional.
@Robbie

From the forum

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Spasman78!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

  • 45 years ago today Niki Lauda passed Carlos Reutemann to win the Swedish Grand Prix at Anderstorp

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

14 comments on “Second Silverstone race likely to remain in “traditional format””

  1. I don’t know about anyone else but I’m quite interested in seeing how teams approach the second races as it’s effectively the first time there’s ever been an opportunity for a “do over” in F1.

    Surely it’s likely that someone or one of the teams will roll the dice in the second race and try something radically different in an attempt to leap further up the field.

    People keep saying we’ll just get the same outcome – I’d be massively surprised if that’s the case and I’m looking forward to seeing just what variables teams manage to change to try and get a different one.

    1. @dbradock The outcome indeed isn’t going to be the same with precisely the same results, same moves, and other on-track stuff, etc. Every single race is different at least one way or another.

  2. Good CotD, @robbie. I’m with you that if there was ever the thought of bringing the aeroscreen to F1, it would have been incorporated into the 2021 (now 2022) regulations. F1 seems satisfied with relying on the halo for safety from big items (other cars, barriers, etc.), plus the helmet from smaller debris.

    To me another outstanding big question is that IndyCar, like F1, races in the rain. What will they do for visibility on rainy days?

    I don’t have as much of a question of the aeroscreen, as I’d assume that speed of the cars will “encourage” droplets to leave in haste (remember that quip about “you’re not driving fast enough if the drops aren’t moving up“?), so that’s not too different from how drivers cope with rain on the visor.

    No, instead, this leads to a question about the driver’s helmet visor – with the cars still being open-topped, the helmet and visor are going to still catch droplets (either direct rain, what’s swept off the aeroscreen, or the rooster-tail of spray from the car head). And without the airflow of an open car to take care of the visor, I wonder if that will hamper visibility more. There’s only a limited number of tear-offs a driver has, so is he or she going to continually have to wipe away water with their gloves? Mini wipers on the helmet?

    1. @phylyp given that the airflow over the screen on my motorcycle forces droplets over the top of my helmet & visor except at seriously slow speeds, my guess is that at IndyCar speeds, even behind the safety car, there would be very little from any source that would actually end up on the drivers visor.

      When they’re stationary in the pits, the story would be different but they’d have tear offs for that.

      1. @dbradock – good point, thank you.

        1. @phylyp: Pretty sure Brawn will want the top 3 teams to only have 75% of the aeroscreen development time of the loser teams.

          1. @jimmi-cynic – but the idea won’t come from Liberty ;)

  3. Well, since the reverse-grid idea got dropped (again) there isn’t anything else to do differently with the second weekend.

    I share the same views with the COTD. The Halo is here to stay and I couldn’t care less anymore as I’ve never really paid any attention to it anyway.

    1. Maybe we will get mixed weather for atleast one of those weekends which will help mixing things up.

    2. Sprinklers, we still got the sprinklers.

    3. ColdFly (@)
      8th June 2020, 9:01

      there isn’t anything else to do differently with the second weekend.

      Pirelli could bring a different set of compounds.
      I would not be against this as it will be the same for all.

  4. F1: killing innovation since … well, a long time ago.

  5. How hard would it be for the second race to be counter-clockwise?

Comments are closed.