Got to agree with Ben. I think one of the best bits about Ch4 pairing is Coulthard. He always seems more positive and less sarcastic than his mate Brundle.
I went through a love hate love with Ben Edwards. I loved him when he did Ch5s IndyCar coverage in the late 90s, then really enjoyed his BTCC commentary. Again, a true motor sport fan with genuine passion. I was really pleased when he got the F1 job, but for the 1st year or so, he came across as out of his depth and I was disappointed. He’s definitely turned that round again and he is miles better than Croft.
Croft is another enigma. Again I actually used to like him when he did the BBC radio 5 live coverage, but he simply does not translate to TV. I think that’s a key point to Ben’s statement:
“somebody who improves what you are watching”.
Radio is more descriptive as you have no pictures, but TV commentary only needs to compliment the pictures.
Croft does not. He overrides the pictures, opten with conflicting (often wrong) information. Very frustrating.
Slightly diverging from the topic, but i think the lead presenter also make a massive impact on the overall package.
I was dupious about Steve Jones when he was chosen for Ch4, but he is great in the anchor role, essentially continuing on where Jake Humphreys left off. Not from an F1 background, but genuinely nice person with a solid interest who wants to know more.
On the flip side I can’t stand Simon Lazenby. He seems so 1 dimensional and it comes across as a really awkward lads club.
Biggest coup for Sky F1 this season is getting Karun on board.