Erik Kennedy

+1

No, the planet is not ‘fine’.

I bet you ‘follow the science’ when it’s aerodynamicists designing racing cars. Do you ‘follow the science’ when it’s climate scientists telling you that the planet is in trouble?

Hope so.

Not even in the top ten. Forty-six races between wins for Leclerc. Tenth-longest gap was by Clay Regazzoni, with 54.

Yeah, probably not this . . .

Pretty much this.

I genuinely don’t understand the spite you’re directing towards Hulkenberg, who always struck me as a decent chap and a good competitor.

Precisely. Lewis isn’t perfect, but I think he has a basically realistic self-image. Vettel seems to think he’s incapable of being wrong, and as a result we’re treated to his antics and strops.

Lewis sensibly preserved his machinery and got points that he may need to win a sixth championship, more than anyone else except Schumacher, and you think that attitude somehow shows that he’s not one of the […]

I think on his day Bottas is quite good, but it’s only ‘his day’ at maybe every third race. To be as consistently strong as Lewis is is not something most drivers will ever be able to do.

Makes you realise how […]

Do you think sexist stuff like this makes your comment seem clever?

I’m only being semi-serious. It’s a good fact, though!

Not 2000 yet. (2000 was the last year of the twentieth century.)

Kubica is obviously a good egg. Always has been.

‘Valtteri Badass’ is a much better nickname than the usual ‘Flying Finn’ nonsense. ;-)

Precisely.

Thanks for everything across the years, @keithcollantine! Your knowledge and commitment are the site’s real assets.

4/10. Tense race, but the fact that the leading cars couldn’t even get within DRS range without suffering from turbulence more or less ruined it.

Ha! This is true.