f1alex

@f1alex @Don – thank you boys, much appreciated.

Not really because had it failed on Friday I think they would have been asked to change the wing (or would have done it themselves) before qualifying started @f1alex.

Oops, this dinosaur fumbling the technology here, I would actually rather add my support to @f1alex ;}

Really great comparison.

Wonder if we can do this for all tracks? Come on, get on with it!
@f1alex

Whoa, @f1alex! A picture does speak a thousand words!

Well said, good attempt at explaining what was going on there @f1alex

+1 @f1alex, at the very least it’s fair for the stewards to give him the benefit of the doubt, not that I think they need to. The correct decision, in my view.

And also, what you (@stubbornswiss) say about […]

@f1alex yeah but what did you expect? Last year they were running a 2014 car with a 2014 PU. Of course they were always going to make huge progress with a proper newly developed car and a 2016 PU.

@peartree Formula E sounds like the next logical place to go. There, the battery is the main decider and the design incremental.

@f1alex True, I think a bit like F1 and Canada 2010, they saw the 2006 finish […]

@fastiesty I agree, He keeps cashing-in though, I wouldn’t mind! I feel sorry for Andretti autosport, I keep seeing him lurking around their Formula e team.

@f1alex I really enjoyed the 500 I broadly agree with […]

@f1alex It was great but in my view you are getting ahead of yourself. Nick Wirth has left Honda really uncompetitive meaning that there was pretty much no Honda’s at the front unlike previous years therefore less […]

@f1alex ahh, testing, that old mystical place where we all know we don’t know anything… but we still want to know what we don’t know for sure and will only know once the Aus GP starts.