Seba

They’re like 15 kmh down on the main straight compared to mercedes. Bottom line –> renault is as bad as they’re making it out to be.

Renault engine is still bad, even if TR is ahead of them. Makes no difference.

they went out on used softs, then went out on the ones for Q3 only. So they’re left with 1 fresh set of softs. So more fool you.

Mercedes have this engine power setting called “strat 1” for Q3 which is simply too powerful for ferrari to handle. They can only use it on Q3 though. Never seen them use it during the race.

So he will beat vettel in the race?

ricciardo had damaged FW and both cars were struggling with braking. Even then kvyat was catching TR at the end of race despite being spun round and had to overtake both FI again.

but you’re not an engine supplier.

lol. They need more power, better drivability, better reliability and better fuel consumption. Pretty easy directions. Shouldn’t be too hard on renault, should it? ferrari got it right this year after all.

as […]

ferrari have better car design? On what grounds are you basing that claim?

lol

merc had 810-820 bhp last year.

not untill 100 kg/h at 10500 rpm rule exists.

he did 359 behind massa easily. And actually continued to pull after he got out of his slipstream. That’s power.

Solution is more power, less aero (or similar to what we have now, certainly much less than DDD freaks of 2010) and wider tires.

more speed is good. Lauda is correct in every point he makes. Too many open wheel series and even regular hyper cars are stomping on F1’s authority in terms of outright speed and pace. Something has to be done.

+1

a lot.

2010 aero + v10.

He said a while ago he doesn’t like electric cars in general. Lack of noise and power and such things.

So why would you believe renault and not newey n co?