Si

Maybe I phrased it badly, but why does it matter what other series are doing? It is a small list, because most are feeder series which need to be as affordable as possible. But FE is not that, it brands itself as […]

*grow. Edit button please

I quite like the racing, even if it’s messy, but totally get why people don’t. I enjoy FE and want it to grown, but for me though, the problems really are:

1. Showing up randomly on different channels or just […]

There seems to be an attitude of some people that think that just because the Ferrari didn’t have the pace of the two in front, not removing the lapped cars between Sainz and Verstappen was acceptable.

The fact […]

I don’t honestly know much about Ineos but a quick search suggests its environmental record is appalling, so of course if it is engaging in the perpetuation of a humanitrian crisis or environmental catatrophe then […]

There are usually clauses in contracts for sponsors to drop out if the team brings their brand into disrepute. The one that comes to mind is ING prematurely ending its Renault sponsorship after crashgate. Does it […]

Very well said. Aramco isn’t just complicit in these wars, it is engaging in total apocalypse as the literal world’s worst polluter. One wonders why Seb hasn’t been so vocal about them.

I know that’s flo-vis, but I would Williams to just rock up to the first race in that day-glo splatter. It massively improves the livery.

If Masi had a difficult job, it’s only because he (likely with strong input from those above him) was under pressure to consider whether this was going to be a fair race or an entertaining one. I’m not saying Masi […]

Just like those Ferrari engines in 2019.

If there’s nothing to hide, why don’t you show us?

That Microsoft ad on mobile that appeared on all sides and started annexing all the space was horrid too

Thank you! I’d argue it’s a lot worse though. Smoking is deeply damaging to individual health and second-hand to those around you. Companies like Aramco and Shell (not the only ones, but as the most prominent ones […]

Just a reminder that Aramco is pretty much the worst-polluting company (since 1965): https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed-20-firms-third-carbon-emissions

Nice looking car, but I cannot […]

Fair comment, I think it’s just that they bothered to have a livery launch for what was (predictably) last year’s design

I am whelmed, but only because expectations were so low there was no room to get under.
At least the lines look cleaner on the new shape car

Well since my link disappears every time I try to post it, here it is in plain text:

This is a colossally naive comment. Aramco is lterally the worst-polluting company of all time. It’s that I’m taking issue with, not the fact they’re based in the Middle-East

I can see why they chose to sponsor AM, best team for greenwashing

I’d agree that on the face of it, one-lap qualifying is the most simple, elegant solution. However, surely this would encounter the same problems with track evolution unfairly disadvantaging the earlier drivers […]