Lucas di Grassi gave Fernando Alonso plenty to think about when the Ferrari driver came up to pass the Virgin driver early in the Monaco Grand Prix.
But after Alonso got past di Grassi he made light work of passing Heikki Kovalainen, Timo Glock and Jarno Trulli.
Did the other drivers make life too easy for Alonso? Or should di Grassi have yielded as well?
If two cars are racing for position, why should the car in front yield position even if it does have a much quicker car behind?
Enrique Bernoldi famously refused to let David Coulthard by in the same circumstances at Monaco in 2001 – the McLaren driver stared at the rear wing of Bernoldi’s Arrows for 41 laps.
Di Grassi’s defence from Alonso was impressive while it lasted as the VR-01 clearly had vastly less grip and power than the F10. But Alonso clearly wasn’t impressed, waving his hand at the Virgin driver as they climbed towards Massenet on one lap.
For the tail-enders, holding up a faster car can be costly to their race. Pulling off-line to defend position can make their lap times even slower, spoiling their chances of beating other cars that are roughly as quick as they are.
But how slow does a car need to be before defending its position is pointless? Three seconds per lap? Four?
The Lotuses were less than three seconds off the pace at this point in the race. Jaime Alguersuari was only one second faster, so should he have waved Alonso by too?
Should slower cars defend their position from significantly quicker rivals? Cast your vote below and have your say in the comments.
Should slower cars let much faster cars by when racing for position?
- No - Slower cars should always defend their position from quicker rivals (87%)
- Yes - Slower cars should always let much quicker cars past (13%)
Total Voters: 2,902
2010 Monaco Grand Prix