Hamilton: FIA didn’t say what they meant over review of track crossing incident

Formula 1

Posted on

| Written by

Lewis Hamilton denied he has been singled out by the FIA after it announced it would “revisit” the track crossing he was fined for at the previous race.

The Mercedes driver was fined €25,000 (£21,600) by the stewards, and given a further suspended fine of the same value, for the incident. But a week later the FIA announced it was “revisiting the incident in which Lewis Hamilton crossed a live track during the Qatar Grand Prix” due to its concern over “the impression his actions may have created on younger drivers.”

Although the FIA said it was particularly concerned by the example Hamilton set “in view of his role model status”, the driver does not believe he is being specifically singled out by the governing body. Speaking in today’s FIA press conference at the Circuit of the Americas, Hamilton suggested the governing body was keen to take action following the accident which left kart racer Joe Turney with serious leg injuries in the World Karting Championship on the same day as the Qatar race.

“I don’t think I was singled out,” said Hamilton. “I think ultimately it’s just I think it was just poor communication.

“I don’t think what they said is exactly what they meant. I think what they mean is that they’re just going to look into how they can tackle it, those sorts of things, moving forwards, to make sure that doesn’t happen.

“I think there was a karting incident recently where a kid was hit, so we really need to make sure that we’re continuously focusing on safety. I think that’s really at the root of it. But I just think they probably need to speak to their PR agent to do a better job.”

Hamilton said he made it clear he accepted he had made a mistake by crossing the track after he crashed out at the first corner during the grand prix.

“They’ve spoken to me and their actual point, I think, is important. When I sat in the meeting with them or in the stewards’ office, obviously I put my hands up. In the heat the moment, it was the wrong decision.

“What’s important is to send the right message, particularly for the younger drivers throughout the ages, that that’s not the thing to do. And I apologised at the time and I think they were just looking how to make sure that doesn’t happen moving forwards.”

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2023 United States Grand Prix

Browse all 2023 United States Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

7 comments on “Hamilton: FIA didn’t say what they meant over review of track crossing incident”

  1. I think there was a karting incident recently where a kid was hit

    22 year old kid who tried to push start a go kart in the middle of a live circuit.
    I’m yet to see any disciplinary action against him. Not even a reprimanded.

    1. I’m yet to see any disciplinary action against him. Not even a reprimanded.

      The purpose of a reprimand is to impress on the offender, and also all others, that the action is not safe, and that severe injuries could result.
      I think that young Joe actually knows that, and has a reminder every time the painkillers wear off.

    2. @eurobrun Depending on the venue, any disciplinary action may not have been publicised – or may be awaiting the driver’s recovery and gathering of evidence for formal proceedings.

  2. These ongoing sagas over absolutely nothing is starting to make the FIA look like a satirical cartoon depiction of the EU and bureaucrat / red tape bloat.

  3. To me it seems like the FIA wants to go and have a look at putting bigger penalties on these kind of things in general in F1, not specifically that they want to have another look at this specific incident and revise the penalty for Hamilton?

    1. Yes, but they completely botched the wording of the statement, making it reasonably unclear whether they wanted to change Hamilton’s penalty or not, because of “his role model status” You could be forgiven for thinking that’s what it meant.
      A professional PR team should have been able to come up with something that didn’t cause such confusion. A bit embarrassing is all.

      1. Professional PR teams make blunders all the time…

Comments are closed.