How Ferrari and Mercedes explained their tactical errors in Austin

2023 United States GP interactive data

Posted on

| Written by

Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc’s disqualifications ultimately meant their teams’ tactical errors cost them nothing.

Nonetheless, Mercedes and Ferrari will be eager to avoid a repeat of the strategic mistakes they committed during the United States Grand Prix.

Both teams compromised their drivers’ performances by leaning towards a one-stop strategy. Leclerc committed to it, while Hamilton bailed out and switched to a two-stop, though too late to avoid some damage to his afternoon.

It was an especially frustrating afternoon for Leclerc, who started from pole position but took the chequered flag in a lowly sixth.

Ferrari have tended to suffer more from tyre degradation than their rivals during races this year, which made their decision to commit to a one-stop strategy more surprising. By lap 13 Carlos Sainz Jnr’s lap times had dropped over half a second off Leclerc’s and he ended up switching to a two-stop strategy.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Circuit of the Americas, 2023
Leclerc’s strategy took him from pole position to sixth
But Ferrari persisted with their original plan for Leclerc. “Charles was 10 seconds in front of Carlos after 12 laps, or eight,” said team principal Frederic Vasseur. “We committed for one-stop and it was not a good choice.”

Like Mercedes, Ferrari began the race unsure what the optimal strategy would be. “We didn’t have a clear picture about this before the race,” said Vasseur. “We were a bit hesitating into the first stint pushing, or not pushing that. And we made a mistake.”

Among the front runners, Max Verstappen came in on lap 16, Sainz the next time by along with Lando Norris and the other Red Bull of Sergio Perez.

Leclerc and the Mercedes drivers pressed on. His pace was slightly better than that of Hamilton and George Russell, who abandoned their one-stop plans, but Ferrari reached the point where they felt it was no longer worth converting Leclerc to a two-stop strategy.

“If you do six, seven laps more and everybody is one second faster than, you are losing four or five positions on track, and I think the outcome would have been the same,” explained Vasseur.

That lost time hit Leclerc at the end of the race as first Sainz then Perez came past him. When the chequered flag dropped, the one-stopping Ferrari was nearly beaten to it by Russell, who finished just three-tenths of a second behind Leclerc after his belated switch to a two-stop strategy.

Unlike Ferrari, Mercedes began the race planning to pit twice. But as the race unfolded they team realised they were tantalisingly close to being able to make a one-stop strategy work.

What caught them out was the rate at which their tyre performance dropped off from lap 19. “The strategy was a two-stop but we said if we’re able to go lap 18, 19, then one-stop was was on. I think when Max pitted, we had another three or four laps to cover only to make a one-stop stick.

“But then the lap times just fell away massively from us and we had to pit that the worst of all times, not optimised for one-stop, not optimised for two stop, and that wasn’t helpful.”

Unlike Ferrari with Leclerc, Mercedes salvaged a better result by abandoning the one-stop strategy when they realised it wouldn’t work. Unluckily for the pole-winner, his lap times were a little bit better at that stage, giving Ferrari undue confidence in his doomed strategy. No other driver completed the race on a single stop.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2023 United States Grand Prix lap chart

The positions of each driver on every lap. Click name to highlight, right-click to reset. Toggle drivers using controls below:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2023 United States Grand Prix race chart

The gaps between each driver on every lap compared to the leader’s average lap time. Very large gaps omitted. Scroll to zoom, drag to pan and right-click to reset. Toggle drivers using controls below:

2023 United States Grand Prix lap times

All the lap times by the drivers (in seconds, very slow laps excluded). Scroll to zoom, drag to pan and toggle drivers using the control below:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2023 United States Grand Prix fastest laps

Each driver’s fastest lap:

Rank#DriverCarLap timeGapAvg. speed (kph)Lap no.
122Yuki TsunodaAlphaTauri-Honda RBPT1’38.139202.2356
23Daniel RicciardoAlphaTauri-Honda RBPT1’39.3661.227199.7349
363George RussellMercedes1’39.3931.254199.6848
444Lewis HamiltonMercedes1’39.5821.443199.342
511Sergio PerezRed Bull-Honda RBPT1’39.7371.598198.9940
618Lance StrollAston Martin-Mercedes1’39.9081.769198.6548
714Fernando AlonsoAston Martin-Mercedes1’39.9541.815198.5647
84Lando NorrisMcLaren-Mercedes1’39.9851.846198.539
91Max VerstappenRed Bull-Honda RBPT1’40.0281.889198.4140
1055Carlos Sainz JnrFerrari1’40.0341.895198.451
1110Pierre GaslyAlpine-Renault1’40.4122.273197.6547
1227Nico HulkenbergHaas-Ferrari1’40.9252.786196.6545
1316Charles LeclercFerrari1’41.0252.886196.4538
142Logan SargeantWilliams-Mercedes1’41.2383.099196.0434
1523Alexander AlbonWilliams-Mercedes1’41.3183.179195.8948
1620Kevin MagnussenHaas-Ferrari1’41.5063.367195.5241
1724Zhou GuanyuAlfa Romeo-Ferrari1’41.8793.740194.8151
1877Valtteri BottasAlfa Romeo-Ferrari1’41.9723.833194.6354
1981Oscar PiastriMcLaren-Mercedes1’42.7054.566193.245
2031Esteban OconAlpine-Renault1’44.7896.650189.42

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2023 United States Grand Prix tyre strategies

The tyre strategies for each driver:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2023 United States Grand Prix pit stop times

How long each driver’s pit stops took:

Rank#DriverTeamComplete stop time (s)Gap to best (s)Stop no.Lap no.
14Lando NorrisMcLaren23.361234
222Yuki TsunodaAlphaTauri23.4720.111354
355Carlos Sainz JnrFerrari23.6680.307117
455Carlos Sainz JnrFerrari23.6730.312235
511Sergio PerezRed Bull23.7470.386237
61Max VerstappenRed Bull23.7560.395116
710Pierre GaslyAlpine23.90.539118
818Lance StrollAston Martin23.9550.594240
916Charles LeclercFerrari23.9630.602123
1063George RussellMercedes23.9690.608239
1122Yuki TsunodaAlphaTauri24.1250.764234
124Lando NorrisMcLaren24.1550.794117
1311Sergio PerezRed Bull24.2450.884117
1427Nico HulkenbergHaas24.3080.947234
1522Yuki TsunodaAlphaTauri24.3540.993117
1623Alexander AlbonWilliams24.3540.993229
1763George RussellMercedes24.3570.996121
183Daniel RicciardoAlphaTauri24.3641.003122
1918Lance StrollAston Martin24.4571.096120
2023Alexander AlbonWilliams24.5631.202110
2144Lewis HamiltonMercedes24.6481.287238
2224Zhou GuanyuAlfa Romeo24.7171.356227
2320Kevin MagnussenHaas24.7451.384229
2477Valtteri BottasAlfa Romeo24.7831.422110
2514Fernando AlonsoAston Martin24.8231.462242
2610Pierre GaslyAlpine24.881.519237
2744Lewis HamiltonMercedes24.9161.555120
281Max VerstappenRed Bull24.9741.613235
292Logan SargeantWilliams24.991.629111
3077Valtteri BottasAlfa Romeo25.021.659228
3114Fernando AlonsoAston Martin25.0551.694119
3220Kevin MagnussenHaas25.0671.706110
332Logan SargeantWilliams25.5472.186232
3424Zhou GuanyuAlfa Romeo25.6362.27519
353Daniel RicciardoAlphaTauri26.5133.152247
3627Nico HulkenbergHaas26.5733.212119

2023 United States Grand Prix

Browse all 2023 United States Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

8 comments on “How Ferrari and Mercedes explained their tactical errors in Austin”

  1. Ferrari are still making unreasonable excuses.
    Their car have always been much less performing in hard tire then medium and in many circuits and not only to Ferrari the hard tire seems to not have much different track laps significant loss of performance than medium and sometimes even inferior to them.

  2. I have an idea the team at Mercedes that they replaced James with isn’t as good with data and then directly a decision from it. I mean if it was me I’d have been looking at the slip and g data corner by corner and plotting the curve and seen quicker than that how non linear it was. But it’s like they had a discussion about whole sector or even lap times

  3. All Sunday races should have compulsory 4 tyre changes, the last time this happened the cars were flat out all the way just like racing should be, no tyre saving or coasting. They can fit new tyres or used tyres so the tyre supplier need not produce more tyres than previously.

    1. Coventry Climax
      24th October 2023, 21:48

      How about just having tyres that support and endure flat out racing for more than 4 laps, say 25 laps.
      That means the tyre supplier can actually manufacture and bring less tyres.
      However, it takes more managing to get rid of than just tyres to have real flat out racing again. There’s also fuel managing and electric power managing, for instance.

    2. If you ask me: tyres that last the whole race flat out, at least the hard ones, and no compulsory pitstop. Then, changing to faster soft tyres which may not last that long would be a meter of choice. I find the MotoGP races highly enjoyable without the need to change tyres.

      1. A *matter* of choice

      2. They use the bad tyres to get the field together otherwise the race will end as it starts (excluded racing accidents) which would be very boring to watch.
        MotoGP is in this case very boring but they are nimble and the one who saves his tyres is the one wining in the end. I was a fan of Jumping Jack MIddelburg (1975-1984) and sometimes i watch races where Rossi won…..
        Changing gears for a more topspeed or getting faster from a corner those were the times :)

  4. I do think Mercedes left Hamilton out a lap or two later than they should but there is some mitigating factors at play that mean the choice isn’t as simple as people frequently make out. Had there been a safety car or VSC for example in the laps where Hamilton had created a offset or indeed in the first stops after Norris and Verstappen pitted then he could have ended up in a prime position to win.

    Had there been a safety car after the second round of stops that gathered the pack up then Hamilton on his Medium tyres would have likely easily taken both Norris and Verstappen too and made their tyre strategy choices look bad. The MHM taken by Hamilton was a better strategy than either Norris or Verstappen, the only issue was he lost 3s more in the pitstops than his competitors and leaving him out slightly too long in stint one meant he cost himself a few extra seconds due to lap time and running wide.

    Prior to the race, nobody knew Verstappen would be nursing a car issue so in normal circumstances he’d have been down the road and gone and Mercedes were right to focus their strategy on beating Norris first and foremost which they did (before the penalty). I personally thought Mercedes strategy was a bit too low risk but I don’t think it was a outright mistake like Ferrari’s with Leclerc.

Comments are closed.