IndyCar drivers back Nashville track despite crash-strewn race

IndyCar

Posted on

| Written by

With no fewer than nine caution periods including a pair of red flags, and just 47 out of 80 laps run ‘under green’, IndyCar’s first race on the streets of Nashville was not the purest motorsport spectacle.

The category and its predecessors have seen more difficult race debuts than this. The CART Indycar championship did not return to Texas Motor Speedway after its aborted race 20 years ago. Nor has the modern IndyCar series gone back to NOLA Motorsports Park in Louisiana after its near-flooded 2015 event.

The championship will be anxious for its latest new venture to avoid the fate of its short-lived races in Baltimore and Houston within the last decade. Nashville at least managed to hold its first race, which is better than the promoters of the ill-starred Boston Grand Prix managed five years ago.

But the drivers’ reaction to the event, despite a race filled with crashes, gives much cause for optimism about the future of the Nashville event.

Scott Dixon, who registered his 125th career IndyCar podium with a second place finish, suggested much of the carnage could be avoided in future instalments of the event if drivers used more discretion at key areas of the circuit.

IndyCar’s Baltimore street race proved short-lived
“Maybe driver etiquette needs to be kicked up a bit, I think,” said the six-times champion. “There were some regulars that were making some mistakes and hitting people. Maybe that needs to be looked at, or the penalties need to be stronger when you cause accidents like that.”

There were several instances of ‘cautions breeding cautions’ on Sunday, as Dixon alluded to. “It’s a tricky track, it’s really difficult,” he said. “Especially on restarts, when you’re trying to get temperature in the tyres, and knowing it was going to be somewhat hard to pass.

“There were a lot of people that were trying to make it happen on the restarts – and I totally get that. It’s a balance that you’ve got to try to work out. You look at [Colton] Herta, he made the passes happen. It can be done cleanly, like he did.”

However Dixon admitted the 11-turn, three-and-a-half kilometre course has scope for improvement before the series returns next year. “There may be some areas of track that can change a little bit, that would create some passing zones, maybe make the racing a little bit better.”

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

That sentiment was echoed by Dixon’s team mate, race winner Marcus Ericsson. He sees the narrow north end of the circuit – which some compared to the castle complex at the Baku Street Circuit in Azerbaijan – as an area of opportunity.

Jimmie Johnson, Ganassi, IndyCar, Nashville, 2021
Several drivers were caught out by tricky Nashville track
“The [turn] four through eight section is a little bit on the slow side,” he said. “So maybe there, they could open it up, and make it a little bit wider,” said Ericsson. “That could maybe help.”

Ericsson admitted his positive sentiment about the venue was potentially coloured by his improbable victory from 18th on the grid following an aerial crash.

“The track is really cool to drive. It is very tough because it’s bumpy, and there’s different surfaces. It’s a very difficult track to drive as we’ve seen all weekend. But I like that challenge. I think it takes the best out of us drivers to try and figure out all these bumps, figure out where to place the car.

“I’ve been speaking to a lot of other drivers, and I think everyone has been impressed with how much fun the track is. Because when we saw the layout, it was a bit like, ‘I’m not sure how much fun this will actually be,’ because it didn’t look that exciting on the layout. When we actually got here, I thought it was a lot more fun to drive than I expected. There was a lot more elevation from what I expected from what I seen before. It’s so cool going over the bridge and back.”

Much was said during practice and qualifying about the bumpy nature of the circuit – in particular, the jarring bumps in the transitions on and off the Korean War Memorial Veterans Bridge.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

“The track is actually really good, it’s just the bridge,” said third place finisher James Hinchcliffe. “Even over the bridge isn’t that bad, it’s just the transitions on and off that are really the issue.”

The grandstands were packed on race day
The entrance to turn nine in particular saw several crashes during the weekend – and a hair-raising save by rookie Scott McLaughlin early in the race. “If it wasn’t for those, I think it wouldn’t even make top three bumpiest tracks, I don’t think,” Hinchcliffe added.

The shortcomings of the track layout aside, drivers praised the new addition to the series’ calendar, especially the enthusiastic reaction the race received from locals. The grandstands were packed, even though not all were built until the morning of the race, prompting some displeased feedback on social media.

“The crowd in Nashville is unbelievable,” said Hinchcliffe. “You’d think this race had been going on 40 years. It’s like a Long Beach, Toronto, St. Pete in year one, and I’m excited to come back.

“To come to the race and see how many people actually took the time to show up, how many people stuck around till eight o’clock to see the end. It wasn’t just like some guy that heard some noise and walked in. These were race fans.

“There was a ton of merch, a lot of people that knew what they were talking about, who knew the drivers. It wasn’t just we got ‘dumb lucky’ putting ourselves in a highly populous city. There’s an appetite for racing here.”

IndyCar

Browse all IndyCar articles

Author information

RJ O'Connell
Motorsport has been a lifelong interest for RJ, both virtual and ‘in the carbon’, since childhood. RJ picked up motorsports writing as a hobby...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

7 comments on “IndyCar drivers back Nashville track despite crash-strewn race”

  1. It’s always good to create a new venue, more races and get more fans involved but last Sunday’s race was not high quality racing, I don’t think it was the drivers fault but more the promoters creating a track that was not suited for Indy cars.

    There were 33 laps of yellow flags out of a 80 lap race, that’s almost half of the race that was under yellow. Nine caution periods, Two red flags not due to weather. Ericsson made a total of seven pit visits during the race, the ones he beat to the podium only made four. Reportedly cars were airborne 15 times per lap due to bumps,

    There were zero on-track passes for the lead! How can that be a good race?

    This race now has the infamous distinction of being the slowest Indy race ever in the history of Indy racing at just 72.607 mph. It broke a 100 year record (1911) at 74mph!

    Even the two-seater Indy car for fan rides hit the wall on Friday and had to be towed away, now out of commission. That should say something.

    I hate to say it but it was a terrible Indy race track and it was luck of the draw race on who would win, the track needs serious adjustments to make it worthwhile for Indy cars and make it quality racing. It might have been entertainment for some (newbies) but it was not quality motor racing that Indy has been known for and this is the problem that I hope they’re able to solve.

  2. Very well said. The drivers may have been overly aggressive on a track that obviously would be very difficult not to have issues, but racers are going to race. Way too tight and bumpy in numerous areas. The city and promoter did a great job, the crowds were terrific! The track needs quite a bit of modification to make it more racing friendly.

  3. They clearly learnt nothing from Champcar’s dying days where it kept adding awful street circuits to the calendar & then boasting about how many people turned up ignoring how bad the racing was, How bad the circuit was & how many fans despised them.

    Ditch the awful street circuits that add no value to the series & go back to having a calendar that offers variety. Bring back 2-3 more ovals including a big one like Michigan & a small one like Milwaukee, Work out a deal to go back to the airport circuit in Cleveland that always delivered fun racing (Seriously go & watch the 1995 race) & also bring back multiple chassis suppliers that bring back the sort of excitement & variety that helped make CART such a mega series to follow.

    CART was viewed as a top tier category, Indycar as it is is just another spec category which has lost virtually everything that made it great in the pre-split CART era. It’s not even a shadow of it’s former self now because I think even comparing the current Indycar to what it once was does a disservice to what it once was.

    I look at what Indycar has become & want to hit Tony George really hard for killing a series that was indefinately better than whatever it is now.

    #NoToSpecBoringness! #WeWantMoreOvals! #Cleveland!!!!!!!! #BringBackCompetition! #MakeIndycarCARTAgain! #AtLeastTheyDontHaveLetterboxes!

        1. I use hashtags sometimes when anyone else does.

  4. @roger-ayles

    I’m totally with you on Tony George, I will never forget his selfishness and his dis-service to fans and motor racing and how he destroyed what didn’t need breaking up all for the sake of making more money for himself.

    Those dark years were gutting to any fan back then who loved CART and having to watch what he destroyed. IMHO I do have to say Indy made a nice come back when you look back and compare to those sad days. I’m with you on that Indy should not go down this same road as champ car’s did with awful road tracks.

    It appears more now than ever that promoters, tv exec’s are wanting to sell car racing as a spectacle rather than a sport. It attracts many people who were not watching before and since it has less to do with the chess game of racing and more about do or die scenarios that newbies and half interested viewers will stick around and watch.
    Sticking a small condensed track in the middle of a dense population is another huge money stream. It’s a win for the promoters but a loss for real motor racing. It’s a money grab that will kill off a lot of long term fans who tune in every week to watch.
    I’m all for road races, just make them good motor racing tracks that cars can fit on and properly race on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.
If the person you're replying to is a registered user you can notify them of your reply using '@username'.