São Paulo Indy 300
- 6th May 2013, 17:48 at 5:48 pm #236249synapsezaParticipant
They have a mix of street circuits, road courses (traditional race tracks) and ovals. For this season they will go to 16 venues of which the breakdown is as follows:
– 6 ovals
– 7 street circuits
– 3 road courses
I would like for it to balance out and have a couple more road courses (Glen anyone?), but I doubt that will happen.6th May 2013, 18:26 at 6:26 pm #236250thersquaredParticipant
There are reasons why IndyCar races on so many street circuits. That’s where the fans are and the race promoters are dependent on ticket sales to make their money. Unlike F1 where almost all of the races are dependent on state-sponsorship, most IndyCar races don’t have the taxpayers footing the costs of having the race.
Additionally, as I recall there is a limit on the number of top-level motorsport events an F1 circuit can hold. Montreal had until this year the NASCAR and the Grand-Am Series. The series already spends a large amount of it’s money paying the teams to participate in the Sao Paulo race, going to Interlagos would be more expensive. COTA is being looked at although it seems COTA is using it’s other race weekends for V8 Supercars and ALMS. As for the Indianapolis road course, really? This recent article pretty clearly details the reasons why IndyCar shouldn’t be going there.
I also think that IndyCar is trying to avoid F1 tracks so that we can’t directly compare laptimes. This is because while the and IndyCar has relatively similar downforce and power to a modern F1 car (obviously with the continual refinement of F1 the downforce is higher and as for power it depends on the turbo boost level but if the engines were turned to full boost design limit then they would crank out about 900+ bhp) the stronger, and thus heavier chassis required for ovals slows the cars down. This is easy for a casual fan to notice, but difficult for them to understand.6th May 2013, 20:07 at 8:07 pm #236251R.J. O’ConnellParticipant
Building a street race on Sao Paolo when Interlagos is just down the road just seems like a silly thing and a boneheaded decision, right in line with all the others by George, Barnhart and Bernard over the years.6th May 2013, 20:27 at 8:27 pm #236252JasonParticipant
@the_sigman, @thersquared, I believe back in the day there was a non-compete agreement between IndyCar and F1. To my understanding, that is why F1 stayed out of the US for so long and why IndyCar never went to Europe. I wouldn’t be surpsrised if there is still some form of agreement between the two or clauses in the even contracts that prevents them from holding races for both series. A few years ago I think IndyCar ran at Montreal when Formula 1 for whatever reason wasn’t (likely facility qualities).7th May 2013, 14:21 at 2:21 pm #236253sushant008Participant
Full race video for people who missed it..
Tip: Just skip to final 20 laps to enjoy some of the best wheel-to-wheel racing you’ll ever see!7th May 2013, 16:18 at 4:18 pm #236254Victor_ROParticipant
And who would have believed that, at this stage during the season, we’d have to say “Takuma Sato leads the Indycar points standings”…
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.