Marcus Ericsson has been given a five-place grid penalty for the Chinese Grand Prix, which will not affect his starting position as he has already qualified last.
The Sauber driver received the sanction for failing to slow for double waved yellow flags during the qualifying session. He was also given three penalty points on his driving licence.Video evidence “clearly showed that the driver attempted to set a meaningful lap time after passing through a double waved yellow marshalling sector, contrary to the requirements set out in the Race Director’s Event Notes (10.1) in breach of Article 12.1.1 i,” noted the stewards.
“The Stewards also took into consideration the fact that the driver made no attempt to significantly reduce his speed in the area of a double waved yellow flag in breach of Appendix H, Article 2.4.5.1 b).”
2018 F1 season
- F1 feared “death knell” for Drive to Survive after Ferrari and Mercedes snub
- McLaren staff told us we were “totally crazy” to take Honda engines in 2018 – Tost
- ‘It doesn’t matter if we start last’: How Red Bull’s junior team aided Honda’s leap forward
- Honda’s jet division helped F1 engineers solve power unit problem
- McLaren Racing losses rise after Honda split
Osella-AlfaRomeo (@osella-alfaromeo)
14th April 2018, 9:37
That’ll teach him, ouch!
Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
14th April 2018, 9:42
If this was the yellow flags from his team mates spin, then it will have ruined his lap just as much had he backed off instead. As he didn’t manage to improve on his 2nd run. But you should never ignore yellow flags. I would have thought he will get penalty points for this.
Phylyp (@phylyp)
14th April 2018, 9:45
Good point, @thegianthogweed
Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
14th April 2018, 9:47
The main reason why I think this is that I’m pretty sure all other drivers have got these when ignoring yellows even in practice. But given his performance last weekend, I don’t think we should be too harsh on him making an error. He should be able to gain some places tomorrow.
erikje
14th April 2018, 12:41
Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
14th April 2018, 14:33
I could be mistaken, but I didn’t think that was there when I replied. As the article did say it would be updated.
nase
14th April 2018, 17:35
@thegianthogweed
Just a question, what’s the connection between these two things? The yellow flags were indeed caused by Leclerc, or so it seems, but I don’t see what that has to do with the rest of the sentence.
Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
14th April 2018, 22:58
You are correct that what I put here doesn’t really make much sense. I think I was just trying to say that if he did lift off fully, that will have ruined his lap just as much as ignoring the rules and getting a much faster time as he would get a penalty.
Jere (@jerejj)
14th April 2018, 9:44
Why double yellows when there wasn’t any marshal on the track nor any car stationary immediately after the corner as the spin happened quite a bit after the final corner, so a single-yellow should’ve been enough, but nevertheless, if a driver doesn’t heed for the yellows at all then it’s entirely irrelevant whether it’s a single or double, i.e., some sort of penalty is always necessary if a driver doesn’t slow down at all in the mini-sector where the yellows are active regardless of whether it’s a single or double.
Sundar Srinivas Harish (@sundark)
14th April 2018, 12:48
Here’s a Bernie idea: the penalties should accrue for the following races. For instance, if a driver qualifies 18th and gets a 5 place penalty, he gets 2 places in this race, and 3 places in the next race. This would make penalties meaningful again! I imagine the RBR and TRH drivers would probably accrue enough penalties until the next season.
James Brickles (@brickles)
14th April 2018, 12:56
It’s one of those ideas that on initial thinking, doesn’t sound too bad, but you then realise just how unfair it is for the driver to already be penalised for the next race.
nase
14th April 2018, 17:31
@sundark
F1 used to have such a system just a few years ago, but it was scrapped due to the fans’ constant moaning.
Nitzo (@webtel)
14th April 2018, 17:48
@sundark
Let us go back in time with your idea to the days when Jenson and Fernando earned some 50 place grid penalties. !!
That would have sabotaged their entire season. I think this idea was doing the rounds a few years earlier but the penalty system wasn’t as sensible as it is in 2018 and hence chucked.
nase
14th April 2018, 18:04
@webtel
It didn’t just make the rounds, it was actually in vigour for a short time, but limited to the round following the round the penalty was given in. I think it was abolished after 2014 (so I guess it was used in 2013/2014), and replaced by a system where penalties exceeding the grid size were converted into time penalties for the race (I think the rule was: 1-5 places = 5 seconds at the first pit stop; 6-10 places = 10 seconds; 11-15 = drive-through in the first 3 laps; more than that = 10 seconds stop-and-go in the first 3 laps of the race). This system was scrapped during the course of the 2015 season, as it caused an uproar among McLaren’s fans, as the Woking outfit, with their ridiculous engine component usage, were hit with such a penalty almost every other race. This change led to (more or less) the current system, where engine component changes are inconsequential if you qualify at the back of the grid.
Nitzo (@webtel)
14th April 2018, 18:15
@nase
I remember those time penalties for untaken grid penalty positions, which was later scrapped as you mentioned.
But prior to that, were they carried over to the next race ? are you sure ?
Michael Brown (@)
14th April 2018, 21:41
@webtel As far as I am aware, this never happened
nase
14th April 2018, 21:45
@webtel
Yes, absolutely. I did a bit of research, and it seems that carrying over penalties to the next round only took place in 2014.
Here’s what wikipedia has to say on the 2014 season:
Here’s an article from racefans.net (or f1fanatic.co.uk, as it was called back then) that marks the transition between the carry-over system and the time penalty system (the comments are especially telling).
And here’s another blogger’s take on the 2014 regulations:
I would’ve quoted directly from the 2014 sporting regulations, but I couldn’t find the document anymore.
nase
14th April 2018, 21:46
@mbr-9
Gosh, thanks for your insightful comment …
Sundar Srinivas Harish (@sundark)
15th April 2018, 3:29
Ah, yes, that was probably at the back of my mind.
Sundar Srinivas Harish (@sundark)
15th April 2018, 3:33
@webtel That’s why its a Bernie idea. He probably drinks unfair brand lager and eats sabotage brand chips every evening.