How Ferrari’s “mega” pace paid off in tactically complex Japanese GP

2024 Japanese GP interactive data

Posted on

| Written by

The Japanese Grand Prix was a feast for strategy fans as teams explored a variety of routes to the chequered flag.

The change of date for this year’s race, which shifted from autumn to spring, was the backdrop to this, as it meant the weekend was held in generally lower temperatures. It warmed up on race day, however, but began to cloud over during the race, causing dips in track surface temperature which further frustrated teams’ efforts to pick which tyre to run on.

The upshot was one-third of the field took soft tyres for the original start, the rest on mediums. As we have seen before, however, large variations in tyre choice at the start can lead to incidents, and sure enough Daniel Ricciardo’s medium-shod RB tangled with Alexander Albon’s soft-tyred Williams and the pair crashed out together.

That triggered a stoppage and standing restart which gave teams a chance to change tyres produced even more variety. Mercedes and Alpine switched their drivers, as did Williams with their sole remaining car. All five were in the same position of having two sets of hard tyres to use and only one medium, and were hoping to reach the end of the race with only one further tyre change.

None of them were able to pull it off. The only driver who managed a near-one-stop strategy was Charles Leclerc, who switched to a second fresh set of medium compound tyres during the stoppage.

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Suzuka, 2024
Mercedes’ attempt to ‘one-stop’ failed
Lewis Hamilton especially struggled with his car’s balance, and kept cranking on more front wing angle at his pit stops. “It took us two stints to finally dial more and more wing in to make up for that loss,” he told Channel 4. “In the last stint I was better, but it was too late. I had 10 seconds to regain.”

Hamilton’s lap times on the medium tyre at the end of the race, and to a lesser degree his second stint on hards, support team principal Toto Wolff’s view that the car’s pace improved after its “atrocious” opening stint.

But even the Red Bull drivers were still chasing a better balance in the race. Max Verstappen was unhappy with his initial front wing level – having gone against the recommendation of race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase – and Sergio Perez dropped back far enough from his team mate that Red Bull allowed him to pit first, thereby gaining the advantage of fresh tyres sooner.

“Unfortunately, I think we got caught out with the increase of temperature. With the balance, we just couldn’t get on top of that in the first stint, which meant that the degradation was a little bit higher.”

Lando Norris, who was frustrated to be ‘undercut’ by Leclerc in Australia two weeks ago, pitted three laps before any of the cars ahead of him this time, eventually provoking Perez and Carlos Sainz Jnr to react. But he was in the same position as the Mercedes drivers, with two fresh sets of hard tyres, while the Ferrari and Red Bull duos had extra sets of mediums.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

“With Lando having two sets of hards it compromised a little bit our race more than I wanted to,” said Perez. “But I think already on the second stint things were a lot back under control, We were able to get a better read to the balance. By the time we got to the third stint things were a lot better.”

Norris was ultimately unable to contain the Ferraris, though despite making his second pit stop before half-distance he did not have to resort to three-stopping, as Red Bull suspected he might at one stage.

That was partly thanks to Fernando Alonso behind him, whose especially unconventional strategy helped him out-run the other McLaren plus both Mercedes. Having gambled on taking a fresh set of softs into the race, he started on them, and impressively waited until lap 13 before changing them – two laps further than Norris went on his mediums.

The race underlined Ferrari’s much improved stint pace compared to last year. Both drivers finished higher than they started.

Carlos Sainz Jnr, Ferrari, Suzuka, 2024
Sainz was ‘undercut’ by Norris, but it didn’t matter
“We kind of knew our race pace was better than our qualifying pace,” said Sainz. “Still probably not enough to go for a win because obviously starting P4 and given how good the race pace of the Red Bull is, it’s almost impossible to think about a win.

“But I was hopeful of achieving a podium that in the end we managed to achieve, even if it was a very tough race, very strategic.

“The track condition changed a lot through the race. We went from a very sunny track that we hadn’t had all weekend to a very cloudy track. The degradation went down a lot and you could push a lot more on the tyres halfway through the race. This changed the whole situation quite a lot. At one point, I thought the podium wasn’t possible, but then with a new hard, the pace was mega and I could get back onto the podium.”

2024 Japanese Grand Prix lap chart

The positions of each driver on every lap. Click name to highlight, right-click to reset. Toggle drivers using controls below:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Japanese Grand Prix race chart

The gaps between each driver on every lap compared to the leader’s average lap time. Very large gaps omitted. Scroll to zoom, drag to pan and right-click to reset. Toggle drivers using controls below:

2024 Japanese Grand Prix lap times

All the lap times by the drivers (in seconds, very slow laps excluded). Scroll to zoom, drag to pan and toggle drivers using the control below:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Japanese Grand Prix fastest laps

Each driver’s fastest lap:

Rank#DriverCarLap timeGapAvg. speed (kph)Lap no.
11Max VerstappenRed Bull-Honda RBPT1’33.706223.0950
255Carlos Sainz JnrFerrari1’33.8410.135222.7746
311Sergio PerezRed Bull-Honda RBPT1’33.9450.239222.5335
444Lewis HamiltonMercedes1’33.9520.246222.5141
563George RussellMercedes1’34.4040.698221.4439
614Fernando AlonsoAston Martin-Mercedes1’34.7261.020220.6953
781Oscar PiastriMcLaren-Mercedes1’34.8021.096220.5135
82Logan SargeantWilliams-Mercedes1’34.9001.194220.2943
916Charles LeclercFerrari1’35.0441.338219.9553
104Lando NorrisMcLaren-Mercedes1’35.1861.480219.6251
1127Nico HulkenbergHaas-Ferrari1’35.3251.619219.352
1218Lance StrollAston Martin-Mercedes1’35.7982.092218.2241
1331Esteban OconAlpine-Renault1’36.2322.526217.2452
1422Yuki TsunodaRB-Honda RBPT1’36.3422.636216.9951
1577Valtteri BottasSauber-Ferrari1’36.6082.902216.3925
1610Pierre GaslyAlpine-Renault1’36.6422.936216.3248
1720Kevin MagnussenHaas-Ferrari1’36.6542.948216.2924
1824Zhou GuanyuSauber-Ferrari1’37.1603.454215.169

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Japanese Grand Prix tyre strategies

The tyre strategies for each driver:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Japanese Grand Prix pit stop times

How long each driver’s pit stops took:

Rank#DriverTeamComplete stop time (s)Gap to best (s)Stop no.Lap no.
181Oscar PiastriMcLaren22.848232
218Lance StrollAston Martin22.9110.063434
311Sergio PerezRed Bull22.9560.108233
411Sergio PerezRed Bull22.990.142115
563George RussellMercedes22.9910.143337
614Fernando AlonsoAston Martin22.9980.15113
74Lando NorrisMcLaren23.0490.201111
810Pierre GaslyAlpine23.1020.254332
955Carlos Sainz JnrFerrari23.1360.288215
1014Fernando AlonsoAston Martin23.1570.309233
111Max VerstappenRed Bull23.1770.329116
124Lando NorrisMcLaren23.2320.384226
131Max VerstappenRed Bull23.2340.386234
1418Lance StrollAston Martin23.2380.39322
1516Charles LeclercFerrari23.2850.437226
162Logan SargeantWilliams23.2870.439441
1744Lewis HamiltonMercedes23.3330.485223
1822Yuki TsunodaRB23.3580.5127
1918Lance StrollAston Martin23.3580.51212
2031Esteban OconAlpine23.3940.546219
2181Oscar PiastriMcLaren23.420.572112
2222Yuki TsunodaRB23.4860.638322
2363George RussellMercedes23.5770.729222
2455Carlos Sainz JnrFerrari23.5910.743336
2527Nico HulkenbergHaas23.6220.77415
2610Pierre GaslyAlpine23.8440.996216
2724Zhou GuanyuSauber23.911.06217
2844Lewis HamiltonMercedes23.9561.108339
2927Nico HulkenbergHaas23.9931.145233
3031Esteban OconAlpine24.1811.333333
312Logan SargeantWilliams24.221.372334
3277Valtteri BottasSauber24.8241.97616
332Logan SargeantWilliams25.532.682222
3477Valtteri BottasSauber25.9463.098222
3520Kevin MagnussenHaas26.1983.35222
3624Zhou GuanyuSauber26.6533.805211

2024 Japanese Grand Prix

Browse all 2024 Japanese Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

4 comments on “How Ferrari’s “mega” pace paid off in tactically complex Japanese GP”

  1. Interesting that TSU’s lauded pit-stop on lap 22 is the 22nd out of 36 in the table, while those of SAR, BOT and MAG are at the very bottom of the rankings (33-35). Maybe it was not the stop of TSU that was so good, but rather those of the rest were quite poor.

    1. most likely it is as you say, but you can’t be sure because what we are looking at are total pit times. Meaning that (without checking or remembering actual stop times) Tsunoda might have made a mess of his pit entry and or speed, and still save the day thanks to a very quick work by his mechanics

  2. “Max Verstappen was unhappy with his initial front wing level – having gone against the recommendation of team principal Gianpiero Lambiase ”

    I haven’t been following the Hornergate recently, so wasn’t aware he had been replaced as TP. Though I did hear him on the radio at the end, congratulating Max. Did he switch roles with Gianpiero? Is he now Max’s race engineer? How does Jos feel about this?

  3. I’ve got the feeling the cars (and not only RB!) were over a second a lap faster than in September last year…
    Anyone who has evaluated the data and statistics? I think the weather was comparable, but I might be wrong.

Comments are closed.