Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Yas Marina, 2019

Leclerc was unaware of investigation during race

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: Ferrari didn’t tell Charles Leclerc he was under investigation for a potential fuel violation before the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix started.

What they say

The news that the number 16 car had been found potentially in breach of the regulations broke three-quarters of an hour before the race started, but Ferrari decided against warning their driver, Leclerc revealed immediately after the race:

No, I was not aware. I had to focus on driving, which I did. And I understand [why], to be honest. I’ve got no idea what the issues are. I will go to speak with the team. I don’t know.

Quotes: Dieter Rencken

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

It’s not just Carlos Sainz Jnr who’s unhappy with the coverage of yesterday’s Abu Dhabi Grand Prix:

Once again the quality of today’s entertainment was significantly reduced by a rubbish programme direction. If I can sit at home and realise that they are focusing on the wrong action at the wrong time then they should be able to too, seeing as they are the professional. Race after race, this happens multiple times.

Will he get out of the pits before or after the competitor? Ooh, it’s gonna be tight! Nah, instead, show me an identical replay of a pit stop that I just watched.
@Shimks

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Katederby and Us Williams Fan!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

10 comments on “Leclerc was unaware of investigation during race”

  1. It wasn’t really Charles that was under investigation though was it. It was his car and Ferrari as a team that was being investigated and frankly there was absolutely no reason to wait until after the race.

    Charles didn’t fuel the car and I’m pretty sure doesn’t do the paperwork either.

    The whole thing should have been done and dusted while the race was on.

    1. There’s only downside in giving this information to him. At best, he’s going to say “oh well, whatever.” At worst he’s going to get frustrated and lose his concentration.

      It wasn’t essential information for him to drive with and he couldn’t do anything about it anyway so why bother telling him something with no upside?

  2. That’s it, Ladies and Gentlemen. A long season with a few highlights, and a lot of mediocrity and predictability.

    I will now take a break until the Rolex24 from the world of motorsport in general and wish a happy holidays to all, regardless. Remember to support your local series, clubs and tracks.

    1. Strange reaction.. 2019 turned out to be one of the best seasons after the french GP.
      Before that is was predictable but entertaining.
      Great season with a somewhat dull ending partly due to the bad director.

  3. Agree with the COTD, its has been the same every year. They rather show the leading car driving around all by itself than and missing great fights in the midfield.

  4. Regarding Gio de van der Garde’s and Oriol Servia’s tweets, respectively:
    While that type of respect is appreciative, it shouldn’t have an impact on the DOTD-choice(s), which should be a ‘solely’ race-based choice, rather than a popularity-based one.
    I don’t really agree with the following tweet: Yes, while there wasn’t a direct on-track battle for the race win, there were several battles for a position further down the field, and ‘real’ overtakes still happened after DRS finally became available. You can’t really define a ‘real’ passing move anyway. I also find the Yas Marina Circuit relatively enjoyable to drive. Yes, it could be a bit more flowing and definitely isn’t on a level with the likes of Spa, Suzuka, Monza, or Silverstone on that front, but quite enjoyable nevertheless.
    As for the COTD: Yes, the live-world feed footage should focus more on the parts of the field with at least two drivers close together than on a lonely race-leader. Not showing Checo’s move on Norris nor Sainz’s move on Hulk, and Ricciardo’s on his teammate shortly after was justifiable, though, as it’s a standard procedure to show the race-leader and eventual winner crossing the timing line/passing the chequered flag when that happens.

    1. While that type of respect is appreciative, it shouldn’t have an impact on the DOTD-choice(s), which should be a ‘solely’ race-based choice, rather than a popularity-based one.

      I sympathize with your viewpoint, and agree that the DOTD should go to the best driver on a Sunday.

      That said, I don’t mind redditors and other social media folks making the official F1 DOTD into a bit of a joke, simply because – in my eyes – it is a bit of a joke in its current state.

      Voting closes the moment the race ends. At which point, those of us who don’t have access to F1TV (by choice or by design) only have knowledge of what the TV director elected to show us, and a leaderboard, to determine how we cast our vote.

      You can see how this can result in a deserving driver being missed out. On the other hand, if you look at the information one has post-race (highlights reel, charts, graphs and data from RaceFans to show drivers performances, etc.) one might realize that there was an invisible star who probably did a great job given the car he had, but was overlooked at the rush of the chequered flag.

      It is for that reason I prefer looking at RaceFans’ DOTW, especially the comments where people explain why they chose an unusual choice. It might be interesting to see if RF conducts a DOTD themselves, to see how much it diverges from the F1 DOTD.

  5. COTD: Yup. One of the most frustrating things yesterday was (again) watching how McLaren and Renault swapped positions multiple times on the leaderboard on the left, but the pictures focused on something completely different, usually a car running alone. Many times we also saw a pit stop, and followed the car until it was halfway out of the pits, and then cut to something different. I would really like to hear the director’s reasoning for these kind of choices that seemingly detract the audience’s enjoyment overall, as well as, if you take the “what is the story of this race, or this moment” approach, do not follow the thing happening on screen until it has reached some kind of conclusion. Argh!

    1. but but.. we have seen the child of Kimi (again)
      Thats important it seems…
      for Americans?

  6. Directing was useless. Servia don’t say that sky sports f1 will censor you soon.

Comments are closed.