Force India have launched their 2012 F1 car at Silverstone circuit.
The VJM05 is their fourth car to use a Mercedes engine. It will be driven by Paul di Resta and Nico Hulkenberg, the latter taking Adrian Sutil’s place at the Silverstone-based squad. The team’s test driver Jules Bianchi was also present at the presentation of the new car.
The team aim to build on their best-ever result of sixth in the constructors’ championship last year.
Di Resta, who starts his second season with the team, said: “The thing we’re going for this season is a stronger start than we did last year.
“Our momentum towards the end of the year was incredible and I think everyone is still on a buzz from that and it would be great to start from where we left off.”
“I want to do better, that’s my main focus. Last year we were very close to coming fifth as a constructor and we met our ambitions by finishing sixth.
“We’ll keep moving on, as long as it’s upwards, that’s the main focus. We need to push and carry that momentum from last year.”
Di Resta and Hulkenberg each have a single F1 season to their name. Di Resta added: “Hopefully me and Nico can work well together. We’re quite young but we’re very ambitious.”
Hulkenberg, who drove for Williams in 2010 and was Force India’s reserve driver in 2011, said: “It feels good to be making a return to F1.
“I was very happy when I found out because last year, sat on the sidelines wasn’t easy. But still a good year because Force India gave me the opportunity to prove my skills on Friday mornings.
“I think I improved and continued to learn in 2011, but in different ways. Obviously I wasn’t driving, but behind the scenes, on the pit wall seeing how everything worked – these are all things that should help me in races.”
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Here are the first pictures of Force India’s new F1 car:
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Quotes and additional reporting by Dan Cross.
2012 F1 cars
- New HRT F112 seen for the first time in Spain
- New Marussia MR01 breaks cover at Silverstone
- A closer look at the Caterham CT01
- Mercedes W03 officially revealed in Spain
- Picture: Mercedes W03 spied at Silverstone
- Mercedes W03 spotted testing at Silverstone
- Williams FW34 launch: First pictures of their 2012 F1 car
- Toro Rosso STR7 – first pictures and video of Toro Rosso’s 2012 F1 car
- Red Bull RB8 launch – first pictures and video of Red Bull’s 2012 F1 car
- Sauber C31 launch – first pictures and video of Sauber’s 2012 F1 car
damonsmedley (@damonsmedley)
3rd February 2012, 9:22
I really didn’t like their livery last year, but this reworking of the same colours doesn’t actually look that bad. It’s not great, but it’s less ugly!
There’s something about that car. It has the stepped nose, but it doesn’t ruin the rest of it. I like it, but I’ve only seen a couple of pictures.
Mike (@mike)
3rd February 2012, 10:18
Know what you mean, it looks pointy and aggresive. I really like it.
Fer no.65 (@fer-no65)
3rd February 2012, 11:20
I really like it too… it looks mean! I hated the fat, high and flat nose they had since 2009, so this isn’t too bad really!
Fer no.65 (@fer-no65)
3rd February 2012, 11:22
sad about the SAHARA text on the car, it quite ruins it.
Surely they could come up with something better than: “just write SAHARA in Arial 42”.
dennis (@dennis)
3rd February 2012, 11:57
Comic Sans or Helvetica would fresh the place up.
Randy (@randy)
3rd February 2012, 12:51
Says a lot about the design if someone thinks that Comic Sans would fresh it up.
If i were the designer of VJM05, i would burst into tears reading that. :D
Fixy (@)
3rd February 2012, 18:05
What! Comic Sans!
MaroonJack (@maroonjack)
4th February 2012, 8:37
I sense a hint of sarcasm here, at least when it comes to Comic Sans… but the font they used is actually Helvetica, not Arial (look at the letter “R” in SAHARA).
TommyB (@tommyb89)
3rd February 2012, 11:26
I love the livery. All except that Sahara logo on the side.
Mallesh Magdum (@malleshmagdum)
3rd February 2012, 15:54
@tommyb89 @randy @dennis fer-no65 @prisoner-monkeys @keithcollantine have a look at the Sahara logo here…u cant expect them to write it in a different font on the car! It will be like writing Vodafone in “Times New Roman”! https://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1366&bih=667&tbm=isch&q=sahara+india+logo&revid=1200413381&sa=X&ei=8QEsT_nRNcLKrAekw4DkDA&ved=0CEAQ1QIoAQ
Randy (@randy)
3rd February 2012, 16:24
Don’t get me wrong, i do not expect Sahara to change their logo font, i was merely pointing out the fact that if someone thinks the design would look better with Comic Sans, well…
Comic Sans is the Justin Bieber (or F2012) of fonts.
As a side note in my opinion bog standard bold Helvetica for a logo is just cheap and unimaginative.
Mallesh Magdum (@malleshmagdum)
3rd February 2012, 17:45
@randy agree, but there are better ways to integrate the Sahara logo on the car. All Indian teams, be it cricket or hockey are sponsored by Sahara India Pariwar. And the logo looks just right on those cricket and hockey jerseys
f1geordie (@f1geordie)
3rd February 2012, 17:07
agreed not sure about the livery but the actual car look good and aggressive, the designers have done a good job making the stepped nose look not as ugly
andae23 (@andae23)
3rd February 2012, 17:49
Reminds me of http://www.sharkdiving.us/images/hammerhead/01.jpg
Rob Wilson (@rob-wilson)
3rd February 2012, 9:23
The more of these i see the prettier the McLaren gets!
Slr (@slr)
3rd February 2012, 9:26
I initially criticised the McLaren, now I take back every word I said.
Dan Thorn (@dan-thorn)
3rd February 2012, 10:32
I actually really like the pointy, angular noses. The McLaren looks very plain in comparison.
egsgeg
3rd February 2012, 11:34
I wonder if MCL will be faster or slower without the dropped nose?
JCost (@jcost)
3rd February 2012, 11:36
I Wish McLaren is competitive, sure it looks good but it will worth nil unless it can perform.
That trendy nose is ugly but can be the real thing.
KBAutomotive (@kbautomotive)
3rd February 2012, 12:01
The McLaren nose looks much nicer, I just hope they haven’t missed a trick that everyone else has picked up on. Lets face it, McLaren do not have the best record for being quick out of the blocks at the start of a season. Can I interest anyone in the idea of an ugly MP4-27B???
Snafu (@snafu)
4th February 2012, 12:54
since their 2011’s nose is within the limits, I don’t think they’d miss an advantage. they’ve been getting good results with that design so it was suitable for their car.
Mike the bike Schumacher (@mike-the-bike-schumacher)
3rd February 2012, 21:44
I wonder if Mclaren have put a different spec nose on their car for the launch and will actually use same style as everyone else for the season. It could be just Mclaren keeping up appearances the way they always like to.
Mike (@mike)
4th February 2012, 5:09
I’m not sure they can, just because certain parts of the can’t be changed (easily) and I suspect the mountings for the nose are connected to such an area.
Jake (@jakehardyf1)
3rd February 2012, 9:24
It looks nicer than the F2012 for sure. McLaren is still the looks winner for sure.
Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys)
3rd February 2012, 9:24
I actually kind of like it. Yes, the step in the nose is ugly, but the team has run with it, so you’ve got this real duck-bill shape at the front end. And once the shock of that livery wore off – it looks like it was coloured in by a five year-old – I decided that it was as bold as the nose design.
The only downside? The use of hundred-point ‘Arial’ font for the Sahara logo.
davey (@djdaveyp87)
3rd February 2012, 11:08
Its not arial. And its definitely bigger that 100pt!
Sorry had to point that out! I do run a printing business!
matt90 (@matt90)
3rd February 2012, 16:17
I agree, I like how it’s much more rounded that Caterham and Ferrari in particular. I still wish there was no step, but if there has to be then this is how I want it to look. To me this is 2nd to the McLaren so far. Ferrari are very much 4th. The trouble with Ferrari is that the step is a flat profile, by keeping the ridges and having them rounded makes the Force India’s step look less severe and more ‘gentle’ in every direction.
BasCB (@bascb)
4th February 2012, 20:42
I must say, looking at this car closer, its nose is a lot better than the Caterham and certainly than the boxed one Ferrari presented. And the rest of the car has a nicely refined and thought out design that makes it pretty nice to look at.
The refreshed livery is pretty good as well, although i do agree on the Sahara written on the sidepods.
black (@black)
3rd February 2012, 9:24
is is just me or this is much better than the ugly ferrari
Girts (@girts)
3rd February 2012, 9:35
@black I think the FI colour scheme fits the ‘platypus’ nose better than the Ferrari red.
Martin (@martin1)
3rd February 2012, 10:39
I think that it depends on the angle the picture was taken.
Platypus nose is just ugly.
black (@black)
3rd February 2012, 10:50
well i think they made it not as noticeable as the ferrari – anyway it’s still not a great looking car but it’s the best looking so far from these with stepped noses
BasCB (@bascb)
4th February 2012, 20:48
The Force India car seems to be just more balanced a design. It’s nose is flat, but it looks organic and flowing, just like the rest of the car (like those heavily undercut sidepods and the flowing back of the engine cover).
The Ferrari has a strange disparity between the boxy LEGO nose and the flowing forms of those sidepods and exhaust truks.
BasCB (@bascb)
4th February 2012, 20:53
And the airbox is nice and smooth, while the Ferrari went with the extra opening seen on last years McLaren, making it buldgy
Roger Camp (@rogercamp)
3rd February 2012, 11:23
I think it looks way better than F2012. I think it has to do with the colour scheme too. As far as the looks is concerned, McLaren has the best looking car so far. Let’s see what Newey and Lotus will bring…
Maciek (@maciek)
3rd February 2012, 9:30
Aesthetics aside – what is the design logic for the stepped nose? what advantage does it give over a smooth line? from my layman point of view it doesn’t intuitively make sense.
vjanik
3rd February 2012, 9:43
a high nose helps airflow under the car to the diffuser. so they put it as high as the rules allow. The reason why there is a bump when the nose reaches the body of the car is that that can be higher (not restricted by the new rule) What ferrari FI and Caterham have done is to have the suspension mounts as high as possible which also helps airflow and there are some handling benefits as well (that outweigh the higher center of gravity)
So you end up with the teams tracing the new FIA restrictions to the limit ending up with that nose bump.
Maciek (@maciek)
3rd February 2012, 10:16
Well, I pretty much get all that, but just looking at the Ferrari from the side view, for example, I still don’t quite understand why the top of the car has to run in such a straight line, instead of sloping downwards, even a little, from the cockpit to the wheel – is it just a question of having enough space for the driver’s feet, the pedals, etc.? + it’s starting to look as if the FIA dropped the ball on lowering the noses, no? why didn’t they just mandate a maximum height at the tip of the nose….?
vjanik
3rd February 2012, 10:42
when i heard that there is a new rule that will ban high noses i was expecting it to be something like the brawn or the 2008 cars. this is just ridiculous.
Mallesh Magdum (@malleshmagdum)
3rd February 2012, 15:58
@vjanik me too…..expected a Merc like nose
damonsmedley (@damonsmedley)
3rd February 2012, 9:46
Comment of the week! I’d love someone to explain it to us. But it must be in layman’s terms.
BasCB (@bascb)
3rd February 2012, 9:32
The combination of those nose bulbs and the camera mountings make for a nose that trumps the Caterham’s.
And its highlighted by being bright orange, oh my.
Tom (@)
3rd February 2012, 9:34
If it has a duck bill, it’s a hammerhead duck…is the wide black wing-shaped thing on the nose a new on-board camera?
And are the drivers trying to hide something round the back (like the Red Bull team on the grid)?!
bananarama (@bananarama)
3rd February 2012, 10:35
Hammerhead platypus .. I think thats all that has to be said. Other than that nose it seems the car doesn’t have anything really revolutionary on it.
Leggacy
3rd February 2012, 14:14
Yeah, i think that is that camera pod in the front of the nose. I thought there were rules preventing them from using it as an aerodynamic device?
hays33d (@hays33d)
3rd February 2012, 20:34
The rule is that camera mounts have to be aerodynamically neutral, like the suspension wishbones.
Teams put them in different places. Which brings up an interesting question. How much leeway do the teams have in placing those cameras? Is that something mandated by FOM? Just wondering as different cars have different positions.
Abuelo Paul (@abuello-paul)
3rd February 2012, 9:49
It seems the trend is for a chisel nosed Platypus look due to new regs from FIA. Only McLaren have so far been able to convert to a stylish design. I hope the rest have a better interpretation of design and style.
This stepped effect at the front looks as though my Gran has mangled the clay models before production.
Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine)
3rd February 2012, 10:01
Indeed. But there’s hope:
F1′s generation of ugly cars should be a temporary sight
dennis (@dennis)
3rd February 2012, 9:53
Not as nice looking as the McLaren, not as bad as the Ferrari nose.
I just noticed the HUGE undercut of the sidepods. At least from that front angle it looks like they packaged everything really tightly.
BBT (@bbt)
3rd February 2012, 11:56
Yes, similar to the large under-cut on the Mclaren…. I note Ferrari haven’t really done this
Dan_the_McLaren_fan (@dan_the_mclaren_fan)
3rd February 2012, 10:04
Oh God, its not looking pretty : we have the ugly two-level nose, and a wide “mouth” like on the McLaren.
On the other hand, I see the livery has been slighlty modified, and it looks a bit better…
But I wonder what is the small part at the back of the car, below the rear wing…
mingmong
3rd February 2012, 10:11
Nonetheless a very tidy package by FORCE, particularly around the cooling, sidepods & rear. I also see the have reverted back to a conventional role-hoop.
BasCB (@bascb)
4th February 2012, 20:59
Look at what ScarbsF1 has to say about it on first sight – The Flying lap episode from the FI launch!
really nice stuff
electrolite (@electrolite)
3rd February 2012, 10:18
Is weird that I find this the prettiest Force India in a few years? They’ve made the stepped nose work…somehow. Perhaps it’s the livery, but the nose looks ‘aggressive’ as opposed to sin-ugly.
Cyclops_PL (@cyclops_pl)
3rd February 2012, 10:25
You have platypus fetish?
electrolite (@electrolite)
3rd February 2012, 10:45
A flat nose would obviously look better. My point is they’ve made a stepped nose look as good as it probably could be.
Cyclops_PL (@cyclops_pl)
3rd February 2012, 11:08
@Electrolite
If you put it that way, then indeed it’s probably the best they could have done with this concept.
dennis (@dennis)
3rd February 2012, 12:35
@Electrolite
So far I totally agree.
I still hope for more solutions that ignore this trend, like McLaren showed.
N
3rd February 2012, 10:54
I agree i like it, looks like a bullet. Wether it handles well is another matter, but..
King Six
3rd February 2012, 10:21
Best looking horrible nose yet.
hays33d (@hays33d)
3rd February 2012, 20:36
Kind of like, “of all the crappy beer my friend has in his fridge, this is the best one.”
Cyclops_PL (@cyclops_pl)
3rd February 2012, 10:21
Just breath slowly and go back to McLaren gallery and everything will be all right … *breath in, breath out…*
Steph (@)
3rd February 2012, 10:25
I have hated all FIs since they have been in the sport but this is bloody gorgeous. I’ve wanted them to be less white for ages and they finally are! :D The nose is kind of weird with that dip/step but I think I really like it which means by tomorrow I’ll probably be repulsed by it.
damonsmedley (@damonsmedley)
3rd February 2012, 17:07
@Steph Still needs a tiny bit less white in my opinion. And more green as well! But I agree, this is easily the best looking Force India yet. It looks arty and fun!
AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner)
4th February 2012, 17:34
@steph @damonsmedley I like how they have extended the livery more on to the rear wing and made the livery a more complete unit over the car.
Tom (@tomforpresident)
3rd February 2012, 10:25
seriously undercut sidepods, practically double floor territory, very nice. These noses really will take some getting used too, i’m usually a fan of ‘ugly’ cars but not so sure right now.
Dan Thorn (@dan-thorn)
3rd February 2012, 10:37
Controversial opinion: I really like these stepped noses. Now I’m used to them, they look angular and aggressive. The Force India looks fantastic, the Ferrari is a little odd but so, so pretty in profile view, and livery aside, the Caterham looks quite good. The McLaren looks bland in comparison…
Steph (@)
3rd February 2012, 10:44
Agree. I’m still getting over the shock of seeing the Ferrari for the first time but I don’t mind the noses. They’re kind of mad which I like. The FI is just splendid and I only don’t like the Caterham because of the nasty shade of green. I stand by my opinion of the Mclaren: it looks bloated, undefined and has no character.
OOliver
3rd February 2012, 10:42
In aerodynamic, it is often assumed that a sharp profile offers the lowest drag coefficient, but that is not necessarily true.
You will be surprised to find that the drag induced by the blunt forehead is almost negligible.
electrolite (@electrolite)
3rd February 2012, 10:46
It seems FI have taken the Toro Rosso sidepod solution. They’re very flat and low.
They’ve really made that livery work this year, haven’t they?
jonchuckle (@jonchuckle)
3rd February 2012, 10:57
Am I the only one bothered by di Resta’s Coulthard-like insistence on painting everything with a St Andrew’s Saltire? Di Resta races as a Briton, not a Scot (Scotland not being a sovereign nation and thus not issuing racing licences), so the FIA should mandate that he uses a Union Flag, like they did with Irvine and his messy trips to the podium.
And anyway, the wonderful thing about the Union Flag is that it’s a inclusive flag that already has a Saltire for Scotland in. Jenson and Lewis don’t have St George’s Crosses stuck on their cars.
electrolite (@electrolite)
3rd February 2012, 11:10
I don’t find myself that bothered by it, to be honest…If he wants to be a Scot rather than a Brit is that such a problem?
Seriously?
jonchuckle (@jonchuckle)
3rd February 2012, 11:42
Fair enough. I meant on his overalls, etc.: he’s British as far as racing is concerned, irrespective of any personal preference. There’s no sovereign country called Scotland.
It’s like Alonso insisting he’s an Asturian, not a Spaniard (which he is, but only in the same way that I’m an Essex-ian).
matt90 (@matt90)
3rd February 2012, 16:33
I don’t mind too much if that’s how he mainly prefers to define himself. I consider myself Southern, English and British. Those are probably my main identities. I like to think the Scottish people still consider themselves united with the rest of the country as British though. It’s nice to have separate identities, but a combined one is also nice, which is why I think the Scottish getting independence would be a shame, just because it seems unnecessary. It doesn’t bother me that my country is really UK rather than England, and I find it surprising if Scottish people are really so keen to be seen as completely independent.
NickV (@nickv)
3rd February 2012, 11:01
I think this is the best looking car so far – loving the new livery
sam pooley
3rd February 2012, 11:30
this new force india isn’t the best looking f1 car ever but i quite like it. the nose on the new force india is much more refined and better looking than the new ferrari nose, however, this isn’t really saying much as other things such as genitle warts are better looking than the ferrari. to be honest with you, the force india nose looks very much like the nose on the 2011 mercedes car, give or take a few inches in the hight of the nose.
Polishboy808
3rd February 2012, 12:02
Wow, it looks great! Not just for this years regs, but I think this car genuinely looks good. Now compared to the fat McLaren and the stupidly ugly Ferrari, this thing is beautiful! I hope the rest of the cars have a front nose at least kind of like this one.
sumedh
3rd February 2012, 12:04
The stepped nose AND a moustache at the end of it. I hope that it was only to house a temporary camera and isn’t a permanent thing
McLarenFanJamm (@mclarenfanjamm)
3rd February 2012, 12:06
Least relevant comment of the day but… WOW! How shiny are those tyres!?
NinjaBadger (@ninjabadger)
3rd February 2012, 13:09
should be a good view from the camera
HUHHII (@huhhii)
3rd February 2012, 13:11
Force India’s car is definitely my favorite at the moment. It’s not boring (unlike McLaren) and it’s not horrid (unlike Ferrari and Caterham).
PJA (@pja)
3rd February 2012, 13:52
Another new car with the stepped nose, which I personally think are ugly. While I have never disliked the Force India livery I can’t say I have been a fan of it, but I think it may be growing on me.
JK (@justingt5)
3rd February 2012, 14:21
I actually like it, the more I look the more its growing on me. Defo not a shy car and some areas look to well optimised, nice work on the side pod and front wing looks pretty functional. Not as adventurous exhausts as Mclaren or Ferrari but I assume thats what the lower “mini wing” is for on the centre of the lower rear wing beam, to try and utilise the flow for some small amount of aero gain?? I expect to see some clever diffuser work as the year progresses as the cars are going to be running RBR levels of rake to increase the clearance at the back.
Cant wait to see Di-Resta and the Hulk on track, I reckon they could have made good progress with this car!
SouthPawRacer (@southpawracer)
3rd February 2012, 15:18
I think I may take to referring to Force India as “Mustache GP” this season.
Fixy (@)
3rd February 2012, 15:28
It has the horrible nose, but it’s much less accentuated than in the F2012. The livery is great although I’d personally have left the front wing white, not green. The Sahara logos on the sidepods are horrible.
The way the cameras are mounted on the car di Resta drove make the nose worse, I hope they change them.
JamieFranklinF1 (@jamiefranklinf1)
3rd February 2012, 16:35
This is the only car so far (With the front-step nose) that I like. The Caterham still being the least, and the Ferrari not too bad, but still worse than the Force India.
I think the FI looks aggressive and mean. So I’m hoping that it’s quick too.
David B
3rd February 2012, 17:51
I don’t want to raise suspicious but…why Force India was allowed to run the new car out of official test sessions? Were some demonstrative rounds allowed or is there some parts of the rule I’m not aware of?
Selidor
3rd February 2012, 23:09
You can run cars for promotional events and media days.
David B
4th February 2012, 8:23
Thanks Selidor.
Shery
4th February 2012, 2:11
The fastest and the pretiest cars are yet to launch. Fatest = RBR ; Pretiest= Lotus.
Chaz (@chaz)
4th February 2012, 16:37
This cars nose resembles that of a romanesc hammerhead shark… and thus I think a name change is in order…