Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari, Sochi Autodrom, 2018

How far were Ferrari hiding their true pace on Friday?

2018 Russian Grand Prix Friday practice analysis

Posted on

| Written by

Ferrari and Mercedes both brought significant aerodynamic upgrades to the Russian Grand Prix. But at the end of the first day of practice Mercedes were conclusively quicker.

As we’ve seen several times already this year, Ferrari tends to hold back more on Friday, then make a bigger step than its rivals on Saturday. Even so, its half-second disadvantage to Mercedes is greater than we’d normally expect to see.

Has their new front wing not produced the desired gain in performance? Or were they going to greater lengths than usual to disguise the benefit from a very prominent upgrade.

If, tomorrow, the wing disappears from the car, we’ll know the former was the case. But the latter seems the likelier scenario, as indicated by a radio message to Sebastian Vettel during the session when he unable to match the pace of one of the Saubers:

To Vettel: Open the gap to Ericsson
Vettel: I am no faster than him, I don’t think I am any faster than him, really.
To Vettel: Copy that. Because they are lower fuel.

Nor do Ferrari’s rivals believe they have suddenly dropped off the pace at a track where they swept the front row of the grid last year. “I don’t believe it’s real,” said Valtteri Bottas. “I think it’s going to be very close.”

“Normally they gain very strong in the straight lines but today they didn’t seem to run full power or something.”

Best Friday time vs best 2017 time

1. Sauber -2.037s
2. Red Bull -1.078s
3. Toro Rosso -0.69s
4. Haas -0.686s
5. McLaren -0.279s
6. Force India -0.215s
7. Renault +0.056s
8. Mercedes +0.121s
9. Ferrari +0.734s
10. Williams +1.812

At this early stage, Ferrari haven’t shown anything like the kind of year-on-year progress we might expect (see table). Mercedes is also yet to lap quicker than its best 2017 time, but Ferrari is even further away (Williams, meanwhile, look set for another miserable weekend).

We should see significant improvements in lap time once the dust has settled on tomorrow’s qualifying session. The race is being held five months later in the year than last season, which means teams have had the benefit of extra development time.

And Pirelli has brought its hyper-soft tyre, which offers a significant improvement in lap time. Today’s running left drivers less than two tenths of a second off the Sochi course record, and that is likely to take a serious beating on Saturday.

However the tyre performance over a stint has given the drivers some headaches. “On one lap they feel good here but on the long runs both of the compounds we struggled with graining,” Bottas explained.

“I don’t think we were the only team. So definitely in the race in the first stint with the softer tyre compounds it’s going to be very difficult not to open up that graining.”

Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull, Sochi Autodrom, 2018
Expect Red Bull to sit out Q2
Race day is forecast to be 4C warmer which, along with increased rubber build-up between now and then (aided by the presence of F2 and GP3, also running on Pirelli rubber, which were absent last year), should help reduce graining concerns. That may lead some teams to prefer to start the race on the ultra-soft.

“We saw some teams doing long run on the ultra-soft this afternoon because it is probably a choice for the race,” said Pirelli sporting director Mario Isola. “And if somebody tries to start on the ultra-soft it means they have the option to finish the race on soft or, with a lighter car, on the hyper-soft.”

That’s all well and good for the likes of Mercedes and Ferrari, who stand a chance of reaching Q3 on the second-softest tyre, but once again the other drivers who reach Q3 could be at a disadvantage. And while there were only four of them in Singapore, there could be six this weekend as Red Bull’s pair of grid penalties mean they have no incentive to try to reach Q3.

(There is also an unlikely but plausible scenario where no one tries to set a competitive lap in Q2: Five drivers will move to the back of the grid due to penalties. If they all reach Q2 none will have an incentive to set a lap time as doing so would only create the chance they might reach Q3 and therefore have to start the race on old tyres. In this scenario the other 10 drivers in Q2 could get through to Q3 by doing token laps at low speed, not have to worry about fitting the hyper-soft tyres for performance, and start the race on a strategically advantageous tyre.)

The possibility that starting the race on the hyper-soft tyres will be a disadvantage, as was the case in Singapore, underlines the unfairness of the current Q2 tyre rule. But it also highlights the gulf in performance between the front-running teams and Formula 1’s ‘B Class’.

Go ad-free for just £1 per month

>> Find out more and sign up

Longest stint comparison – second practice

This chart shows all the drivers’ lap times (in seconds) during their longest unbroken stint. Very slow laps omitted. Scroll to zoom, drag to pan, right-click to reset:

Complete practice times

Pos Driver Car FP1 FP2 Total laps
1 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1’34.818 1’33.385 58
2 Valtteri Bottas Mercedes 1’34.999 1’33.584 61
3 Max Verstappen Red Bull-TAG Heuer 1’34.538 1’33.827 54
4 Daniel Ricciardo Red Bull-TAG Heuer 1’35.524 1’33.844 48
5 Sebastian Vettel Ferrari 1’34.488 1’33.928 52
6 Kimi Raikkonen Ferrari 1’35.696 1’34.388 50
7 Sergio Perez Force India-Mercedes 1’35.122 30
8 Pierre Gasly Toro Rosso-Honda 1’36.944 1’35.137 53
9 Esteban Ocon Force India-Mercedes 1’35.663 1’35.147 57
10 Marcus Ericsson Sauber-Ferrari 1’35.295 35
11 Kevin Magnussen Haas-Ferrari 1’36.196 1’35.331 54
12 Carlos Sainz Jnr Renault 1’35.341 37
13 Charles Leclerc Sauber-Ferrari 1’37.054 1’35.432 56
14 Nico Hulkenberg Renault 1’36.274 1’35.568 53
15 Romain Grosjean Haas-Ferrari 1’36.816 1’35.911 58
16 Brendon Hartley Toro Rosso-Honda 1’37.944 1’36.024 57
17 Fernando Alonso McLaren-Renault 1’36.074 34
18 Stoffel Vandoorne McLaren-Renault 1’37.187 1’36.617 58
19 Antonio Giovinazzi Sauber-Ferrari 1’36.712 22
20 Sergey Sirotkin Williams-Mercedes 1’37.225 1’36.861 64
21 Lance Stroll Williams-Mercedes 1’39.137 1’37.001 48
22 Lando Norris McLaren-Renault 1’37.022 25
23 Artem Markelov Renault 1’37.183 22
24 Nicholas Latifi Force India-Mercedes 1’37.206 24

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2018 Russian Grand Prix

Browse all 2018 Russian Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

10 comments on “How far were Ferrari hiding their true pace on Friday?”

  1. If Ferrari are not genuinely behind now, they will be by the end of the race. They will find a way. Perhaps only Mr Putin can do something about the Englishman in the Mercedes :)

  2. Nicely explained, thanks.

  3. I doubt that there was all that much holding back. It seems Ferrari’s car has slipped back from being the “best” if it ever was.

    Having RBR start from the back of the field must be fairly depressing for Ferrari as well as there’s no chance of a buffer between them and the Mercedes.

    All Vettel can hope for now is for someone to accidentally take out Hamilton’s car (and I think Hamilton’s too smart to allow that risk) or for a DNF for mechanical reasons.

  4. In case midfield teams do not want to start on ultra, they will more likely run ultra soft runs to eventually reach Q3 and start on them.

    1. But it might be 10 cars doing token tyre saving runs in Q2 as they all will proceed to Q3.

  5. I hope they did.
    But didn’t we all agree that Ferrari doesn’t hold performance this year on FPs? Didn’t we knew what track better for Merc/Ferrari last year opposite to what happen this year?

  6. Despite the little bit of saving on the power unit, what would Ferrari stand to gain by holding back on Friday?

    1. @brolloks, the radio transmission would point towards the team possibly running with a higher fuel load than their rivals, which would be useful in determining how the handling balance changes in race trim as fuel is used and how the car is likely to behave in the opening laps of the race.

      In that situation, they would still be gaining useful information on the performance of the car, but at the same time not making it immediately obvious to their rivals what their performance might be.

  7. We can’t be sure. All of us believes that Merc was nowhere in Singapore and look what happened. Perhaps something similar takes place in Russia in the case of Ferrari.

  8. The harder Ferrari’s back is pressed against the wall, the more they sandbag!
    Always been the same. Then, when they fail it’s always some other team, driver’s fault.
    Mercedes play the game too! But Merc haver blamed another team or driver once.
    They own up to their own fails. Ferrari never admit their own failings.

Comments are closed.