While the rest of us were enjoying a gripping Malaysian Grand Prix, over in the Sepang media centre brows were furrowing.
According to The Times’s Kevin Eason journalists were asking each other: “Do you have the faintest idea what is going on here?”
Afterwards Eason complained about “overwhelming techno-babble” and “a near-chaotic Grand Prix of more than 50 pit stops“.
The Daily Telegraph’s Tom Cary agreed it was “confusing for the viewers“.
But this incomprehension was only shared by newspaper journalists sent to cover the race. Martin Brundle noted: “Fleet Street boys told me [the] race [was] totally confusing. I told them [David Coulthard] and me [were] on top of it no problem.”
Had they cared to listen to their readers and fans instead of making assumptions, they would have discovered the reaction to the race was very positive.
At the time of writing the Malaysian Grand Prix is rated 7.8 out of ten by F1 Fanatic readers, which is higher than 16 of last year’s 19 races.
Here’s a sample of what some people actually thought of the race:
“What was chaotic about it? Interesting? Yes. Exciting. Yes? Chaotic? No!” – merlo84
“If they think that lots of passing and normal, racing action is ‘chaos’, they’re confused as to what F1 is.” – Dan_Thorn
“Near Chaotic? Belgium 1998, USA 2005, Malaysia 2009, and Korea 2010 were chaotic… this weekend past we saw a race.” – Ajokay85
A two-hour motor race isn’t like football or golf or other sports where the focus generally remains in one place. Between the battles on the track and developments in the pits there might be half-a-dozen different points of attention in a single lap.
It’s unrealistic to expect to be able to watch a race and instantly know everything that’s happened to all 24 cars. That’s why F1 Fanatic breaks the weekend down team-by-team every Monday after the race.
But even when the races were ‘simpler’, that didn’t stop the mainstream press struggling to keep up. Remember those nonsense stories about McLaren messing up Lewis Hamilton’s final pit stop in Valencia two years ago and allegedly ‘losing him the race’?
I know that casual fans and F1 Fanatics will differ on their views of the sport. And I don’t think F1’s rules are perfect at the moment.
But let’s recognise these complaints about “chaos” for what they are: knee-jerk manufactured outrage to make good headlines.
- IndyCar’s determination to complete every racing lap is an example to F1
- FIA’s sweeping changes vindicate Mercedes’ belief Hamilton was “robbed” of title
- F1’s sprint race rules change won’t end pole position confusion
- Call F1’s championship finale tainted, but not its deserving new champion
- For the sake of the title fight, F1 must get a grip on its track limits problem
- F1 should hand out refunds, not points, after one-lap ‘race’ at Spa
- Even Hamilton’s critics should be pleased he signed for two more years
- Hamilton, Osaka and a tough question about sporting press conferences
- ‘Hamilton didn’t break the rules by reversing’ shouldn’t be a story
- Haas swept their Mazepin problem under the carpet. Now it’s F1’s problem
Browse all comment articles