McLaren’s new title sponsor plan “is happening”

2014 F1 season

Posted on

| Written by

McLaren’s plan to announce a new title sponsor in the near future is still progressing, according to racing director Eric Boullier.

Ahead of the start of the season last month Ron Dennis said his team would “definitely feature a title sponsor in the next few events”.

Speaking in a McLaren phone-in today Boullier said: “The plan Ron discussed is happening.”

“Until we have signed the package, signed the final contract obviously nothing will be announced or changed. As long as we are in that position we will keep going with what we are doing now.”

McLaren have showcased different sponsors on their sidepods in the first four races of the season. Boullier said the team’s continuing lack of a title sponsor does not affect their budget.

The team are in their final season of using Mercedes engines before reuniting with Honda next season. But Boullier insists they are not marking time while they wait for next year to arrive.

“You can’t allow yourself to think and wait in motor racing,” he said.

“And actually the 2013 year should be a benchmark for us to never do it again. And 2014 should be seen as a year which is not a transition year but a year of let’s say, rebuilding a winning team.

“And then in the middle of this we have obviously this extra challenge to obviously today work very efficiently with our partner Mercedes. But then obviously later in the year to start to implement a Honda arrival. But it’s just part of the challenge.”

2014 F1 season

Browse all 2014 F1 season articles

Image © McLaren/LAT

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

41 comments on “McLaren’s new title sponsor plan “is happening””

  1. More than their sponsorship, I’m looking forward to seeing how they go with Honda power in 2015. In the previous turbo era Honda started slowly with Spirit and then Williams, and pretty much went on to dominate the scene from 1986, despite Alain Prost winning the World Championship using the TAG-Porsche engine that year.

    How will Honda go with the new technology? I can’t see them lagging behind for too long, if at all.

    1. Mercedes are the ones that should be worried; they have the strongest engine, and I don’t see how they can prevent McLaren from sharing a lot of the information about the Mercedes engines with Honda. My assumption is that they’ll be at least on par with Mercedes at the beginning of 2015.

      On another note, I think it’s kinda cool that McLaren switches up sponsors from race-to-race and country-to-country. I mean, sponsors like Vodafone, Telefonica, Santander, etc. don’t make sense outside of Europe (at least in North America, I know these brands don’t exist). It’d be much nicer if they could update liveries from race-to-race as well (do liveries need some sort of FIA approval?). I mean, how awesome would it be if in Abu Double, they raced a Gulf livery, but in the US, they race an Esso/Exxon livery, and BP for Britain, etc.

      1. I imagine pretty much everything needs approval. I think back to a few years ago in Monaco where Kimi had a tribute helmet to James Hunt which was banned – he still wore it of course if I remember correctly. The reason stated I think, was that it was unauthorised advertising for the then upcoming film Rush.

      2. The engine alone is not everything, as evidenced by Mclaren’s current form, which to me should be a worry for Honda, as they won’t even have another team to use as a benchmark.

      3. Global TV audience is obviously more attractive to sponsors. So, even if the brand doesn’t exist in the US, the rest of the world will still see it on TV.

      4. Liveries can be pretty much whatever throughout the year, but any major changes require permission (e.g. Coulthard’s last race livery), which is not given easily.

    2. Lot of people were excited about the Williams Renault partnership too thinking about their history. We all know how that went. !!!!

  2. If I was Honda, I would be a little nervous right now….

    1. For all we know, it could have to do with Honda in being a key part of the deal, and therefore its not finished yet @baron

  3. Maybe the race by race/country by country title-sponsoring deal is more profitable to McLaren for the moment, they can directly target their customers and fans.

  4. With a lack of sponsorship, the return of Honda and the pace of the McLaren in recent times, could it be deja vu for Jenson in 2015: another Earth Dreams car!

    1. @suffolk Except that he will have a hungry Magnussen to contend with .

  5. For once I’m glad we can’t post gif comment in F1F.
    I’m picturing lots of Ron Paul classic before.

    1. +100000000000000

    2. @ruliemaulana My thoughts exactly. ;)

  6. I always found the name “Earth Dreams” extremely morbid. It sounds like dreaming in death, under ground, in your own grave. Hence the name (but without capital E) “earth dreams”. Sounds like an euphemism for being buried alive or something like that.

    1. …exactly what they should have done with the “creative” “genius” who came up with the idea.

      1. I know, if they had maybe plastered the car with shades of blue and space pictures of our planet Earth we wouldn’t have had such morbid visions….oh wait..

        What is wrong with you people?

  7. does this story not sound strangely similar to that of boullier-lotus-quantum?

  8. mclarens problem at the moment is the chassis. they have the best engine, but are struggling to keep up with teams like Williams and Force India with the same engine. I believe all 3 are given an inferior engine to team Mercedes by Mercedes, that may be true or not.
    If Honda build a rocket powered engine for next year, then Mclarens chassis might not need to be the best to win, as team Mercedes are proving this year – with the best engine but arguably an inferior chassis to Redbull and maybe Ferrari.

    1. Inferior engines? Not permissible within the rules and I’m quite sure the other teams would have spotted any ‘inferiority’ by now. So, why would you believe it?

      1. @baron They all have the same engines but they don’t use the same fuel, as I understand it Petronas is much better than Mobil that Mclaren uses so that can explain some deficit in straight line speed/consumption etc. Also rumored is that Shell updated their fuel for China that’s why there seemed to be an even bigger improvement than aero updates alone would bring.

        1. They have to have their fuel agreed and homologated by the FIA. Teams can supply data on several different fuel mixes for different track temperatures and altitudes, but they have to be approved and are tested by the FIA at each race to ensure compliance. I don’t think there’s anything exotic going on that would make a significant difference in car speed but possibly in operating temperature which might affect consumption a little, but it’s not major.

    2. The reason the customer teams are not able to get as much out of the engine as Mercedes themselves is a simple matter of working hand in hand, having intensive contact during development of both chassis and engine kpcart.
      The engines are exactly the same (the rules do not allow for preferential treatment of a team/car with regards to engines), but they fit that tiny little bit better with the whole Mercedes car and setup is what makes a lot of difference. As well as Mercedes having put in a huge amount of effort especially for this year (see the complicated nose construction needing 4 FIA crash-tests to succeed)

    3. The customer Mercedes teams, are sometimes even faster on the straights than the main factory team, which implies they all have powerful engines. Where the likes of ForceIndia, Williams and Mclaren are failing, is in the aero department.

  9. LOL, Boullier must feel a bit like returning to last year with the “Infinity” deal thing on the verge of happening for the whole of the year.

  10. Let me guess…The new title sponsor is “Honda.”

    1. @dmw#
      Well no, its not, because its for this season and they are running a merc engines, its not going to be Honda.

      1. We’ve had a BMW Sauber Ferrari.

        1. GB (@bgp001ruled)
          24th April 2014, 2:51

          not on purpose!

    2. Kevin Nguyen
      24th April 2014, 20:58

      And we technically have, Infiniti Red Bull Racing-Renault.

  11. According to McLaren
    2013: a transition year post Hamilton
    2014: a rebuilding year (ie. a transition year) as they prepare for the Honda regime
    2015: a transition year as the new Honda engine builds up to speed.
    2016: ? I guess they might wanna fight for a title by now???

    1. GB (@bgp001ruled)
      24th April 2014, 2:52

      no. 2013 was the perez year!

  12. OmarR-Pepper (@)
    23rd April 2014, 18:37

    Yeah, obviously

  13. I think Mclaren/Honda will sprint out the blocks next season.The reason being that Mc have had that engine in the back of their car for 2 yrs that I know of. They may or may not have run it on a track somewhere but they will have a pretty good idea of how they’re doing.My money’s already on them for next yr.

  14. It’s very interesting.

  15. Sadly i think they have an image problem and Ron returning won’t help that. They’ve become stuffy and lost something along the way. They need a result and so does Button. Unless he turns it around i think it’ll be Kmag and Stoffel next year.

  16. I put 5 bucks on either Coke or Subway or both.

  17. Maybe Mclaren should consider painting that God-awful nose in black, I’m 100% sure it would significantly increase the likelihood of a sponsor closing the deal.

  18. The livery is so nondescript – change in sponsors’ logos included. The results being achieved at the moment can be described in the same way :(

  19. If it’s going to be Huawei then they just have to restore orange/redish livery.

Comments are closed.