Bernie Ecclestone, 2013

Ecclestone bribe trial close to settlement

F1 Fanatic Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

Bernie Ecclestone, 2013In the round-up: Witnesses at Bernie Ecclestone’s bribery have been told not to attend next week as the case may be settled.


Your daily digest of F1 news, views, features and more.

Settlement of German Ecclestone bribery case possible – court (Reuters)

“‘It is possible that there will be a settlement,’ a spokeswoman for the district court told Reuters, adding the court had told witnesses due to appear in the trial next week that they need not come.”

Finish line in sight for Ecclestone bribery case (The Telegraph)

“Prosecutors may withdraw charges during certain criminal trials in Germany if all parties agree on an appropriate settlement, although the criteria are very strict. Ecclestone could be allowed to avoid further trial ‘in return for payment of an agreed sum of money to a charitable institution or the treasury’.”

Horner: Kvyat has been sensational (Autosport)

“He has been sensational and has been the rookie of the season so far.”

Open article Horner surprised by Mercedes stance (Crash)

“I think they’re in a situation where they’ve done very well and let the guys race openly this year, so it would then seem strange when they are racing each other again to say let one run his fastest strategy.”

Lewis: “It’s not the times of ease that show who you are – it’s the times of adversity” (Mercedes)

“I’m very, very light at the moment, but the car is a little lighter since the removal of the FRIC system so I can now put on a bit of weight – muscle, of course, not fat! It won’t just be all gym and no beach, though. I’m sure I’ll do a bit of both. I need to recharge my batteries so I won’t be going crazy with the exercise, but I feel like a stick at the moment and it’ll be nice to bulk up a bit. Next year the weight limit will be going up by ten kilos too, so I’m thinking I can afford to put on a few pounds!”

A united team, better able to react quickly (Ferrari)

“Montezemolo and Mattiacci wanted to meet with the technicians, engineers, drivers and other team members to reinforce the message relating to the cornerstones on which the Scuderia’s resurgence is to be based. They are greater efficiency and speed in the time taken to react and in making decisions, a bolder approach to risk taking, the need for people to take responsibility for their own actions and a greater sharing of information between the various production departments.”

The First Time – with McLaren’s Kevin Magnussen (F1)

“What colour was your first helmet?
KM: It was in my dad’s colours – black and yellow – because I used his old helmet.”

Daniel Ricciardo’s been the revelation of Formula One season so far (The Times, subscription required)

“In a knee-jerk reaction to the low turnout at the German Grand Prix, there was a call for reform. The mission: to find out what the fans want and how to spice up the show. The answer? Put a bunch of old men in a room for a chat. Heavens to Betsy, there was even the suggestion – now, thankfully, dismissed – that Flavio Briatore should be brought back to head up a task force.”

Why It Would Make Sense For Disney To Buy Formula One (Forbes)

“If Disney were to take over F1 it would be no bad thing on a number of levels. It would bring marketing expertise and would give F1 a higher profile in the United States where the series has been trying to gain ground against local rival NASCAR.”

Formula One Teams Push for a Data Edge (The Wall Street Journal)

“Red Bull is using the fibre-optic data network to try to give its racing cars an advantage. During a race, 100 telemetry sensors in the car relay metrics like speed, pressure and air flow in seven to 10 milliseconds from the Silverstone circuit to data analysts at both its Milton-Keynes factory and wind tunnel in Bedford, both in southern England, as well as engine manufacturer, Renault SA, in Viry, eastern France, some 400 kilometres away.”

F1 2014 and Beyond… Your Questions Answered (Codemasters)

“Last year we featured classic content as the sport itself hadn’t changed a great deal and we wanted to offer a different experience alongside the main 2013 content. However, seeing as 2014 has seen masses of changes to the sport itself, which is providing a different F1 experience for this year’s game and the fact that we are also working on a new generation F1 game, we’ve had to take a break from classic content this year. Don’t despair though, classic content is something we’re still very interested in and will explore again later in the series.”


Comment of the day

It isn’t just the drivers’ response to team orders which can vary, as Antifia points out:

Never a fan of team orders, I’m happy it was not followed in the last grand prix (so I won’t be raging if Rosberg returns the favour).

What grates with me though is not so much the inconsistency of the drivers’ behaviour when faced with these orders as it is the inconsistency of the fans. When Webber decided not to follow the orders in Silverstone, a lot of people praised him for that. When Vettel did the same, they booed him all the way to India – literally.

And then there is David Coulthard… so team orders have to be given by the team principal, never the driver’s engineer? Since when? Most of the calls above were initiated by the engineers (team principals only getting involved after the driver becomes recalcitrant). Not with Lewis though.

From the forum

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Daniel, Nefer and Gilles De Wilde!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

John Surtees claimed the first victory of his championship season on this day 50 years ago on the Nurburgring Nordschleife.

However Graham Hill, who finished second, continued to lead the championship with 32 points to Jim Clark’s 30, with Surtees further back on 19 but poised to mount a surprise bid for the title over the final rounds.

Image © Ferrari/Jamey Price / James Moy Photography

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

Posted on Categories F1 Fanatic round-upTags

Promoted content from around the web | Become a RaceFans Supporter to hide this ad and others

  • 70 comments on “Ecclestone bribe trial close to settlement”

    1. “Montezemolo and Mattiacci wanted to meet with the technicians, engineers, drivers and other team members to reinforce the message relating to the cornerstones on which the Scuderia’s resurgence is to be based. They are greater efficiency and speed in the time taken to react and in making decisions, a bolder approach to risk taking, the need for people to take responsibility for their own actions and a greater sharing of information between the various production departments.”

      The biggest problem Ferrari has has little to do with greater efficiency, speed in decision-making, etc. The biggest problem Ferrari has is that institutionally-speaking, they aren’t willing to actually *do* what it takes to make bold, risky changes. Oh, sure, you can say that they’ve spent lots of $$, and they’ve hired plenty of good people (James Allison seemed to be a huge step in the right direction). But the *only* thing, in the end, that matters is that Ferrari’s way of resolving their problems is to publicly put someone on the chopping block and fire them.

      Yes, on the surface, this seems like “the need for people to take responsibility for their own actions,” but what it *actually* means is that “if you take a bold risk and it doesn’t work out, you will be fired and publicly humiliated.” Which is another way of saying, “do not take a bold risk.”

      As long as Montezemolo & Co. feel like the best solution to the team’s problems is to publicly fire anyone involved in the production of a substandard car, their team will be afraid, technical expertise will continue to churn out, they will not actually *learn* from their mistakes, and they’ll be unable to move forward. Period. Until they can change the culture of blame, they’ll be a team of also-rans and nothing more, history be damned.

      Which would be a damn shame.

      1. It has been ever thus at Ferrari (Schumacher years excepted).

        1. It seems that that period of dominance is the exception that proves the rule indeed. Schumacher brought in his winning team from Benetton, and they produce good-to-great cars all throughout from the get go (the 1996 F310 car wasn’t great but that was a legacy Barnard design).

      2. Ferrari have been known to sack people for publicly criticising them so why change now, but let’s be realistic, this is not a knee jerk reaction. They have actually been uncharacteristically patient, waiting for a performance improvement which simply hasn’t happened. I think if I was being paid their wages, being transported from country to country I would expect to get fired for under performing. Winning is their target and they’re paid to do a competent job.

      3. +1 COTD

    2. Paul (@frankjaeger)
      2nd August 2014, 0:39

      So Bernie is gonna crawl free again, admittedly at a price, but a peanut compared to his assets and earnings. It’s time high profile tax avoiders had real pressure and constriction applied to them, there’s absolutely no way of justifying it (in this country anyways) yet people still prioritise greed over substance and the collective gains; Bernie is just the tip of the iceberg.

      It’s also about this drivers’ weight issue was addressed. There’s no denying the disadvantage the Hulk has over Massa weight-wise. I remember some coined the idea that the driver and his/her seat must be equal to all the others; achieved attaching weight for lighter drivers and some on. It’s dangerous and frankly a bit nutty the way some people are slimming down this year more than ever, Sutil didn’t even take water onboard to save weight!

      In regards to COTA
      Totally agree that consistency definitely wavers in fans’ reactions to team orders deployment. Although I must say there’s definitely elements of a pantomime on the track; fans don’t always react to incidents on track with justice as a first priority, sometimes it comes down to driver preferences. I found myself relishing Hamilton’s defense of Rosberg least week even though I thought he quite clearly ran him off the road, it was wrong but it’s another position for Ham.

      Also ‘Booed all the way to India’ Hahaha

      1. Equalizing driver weight with personal ballast is a brilliant idea. Make sure these ballasts are put near the driver’s CoG. Better than simply raising the minimum weight limit, since that still favors lighter drivers (by allowing the team to strategically place ballasts).

      2. Bernie was in court for bribery and now bribery has solved his problem.

      3. So Bernie is gonna crawl free again, admittedly at a price, but a peanut compared to his assets and earnings

        I agree with that. According to Forbes, his net worth is $4.2 billions. He has offered to pay Bayerische Landesbank $33.6 million to settle the case. I do not want to see the old man imprisoned but less than 1% of one’s wealth is not an adequate punishment for such a crime.

      4. Sorry, according to the latest news, Ecclestone has “negotiated a $100 million (£59.43 million) settlement with the state prosecutor”. But I do not believe it is enough either, $1 billion would probably be a more appropriate amount in Bernie’s case.

        1. His punishment should fit the “crime.” not how much money he has accumulated. Fining people based on their income is persecution, not prosecution. The only thing this kind of affair reveals, is that if you have more money, you can risk more and get away with more, and as long as people obsess over money and toil away their time on this planet for money, nothing will really change in this regard.

          1. +1 agree with @pcxmerc

            gruboswki got nailed for taking the bribe, Bernie made squillions for himself and friends by giving the bribe,

            How can Bernie walk away from this by tossing some change in the hat ?

            I’m guessing the money he bribed Grubowski wasn’t his anyway?

      5. Bernie: The Artful/ Prison Dodger.

    3. What grates with me though is not so much the inconsistency of the drivers’ behaviour when faced with these orders as it is the inconsistency of the fans. When Webber decided not to follow the orders in Silverstone, a lot of people praised him for that. When Vettel did the same, they booed him all the way to India – literally.

      The problem with that kind of discussions is that many people love cheering for a driver, or a team, and others just love racing. Personally, I don’t care who wins, as long as the race is a straight fight between drivers.

      I said back then, and I repeat it now, as a Webber fan, he got what he always asked for: fair treatment, and let the boys race. And he failed to keep Vettel behind. Tough luck, as Seb would say.

      Why should I feel bad about that? what they did that day between the two was just superb racing (alas with the team radio in the way ruining it, just like Seb vs Fernando at Silverstone).

      It’s not me, I love racing. If the races happen to be won by a driver I like, much better. But I think it’s quite fair for the opposite to happen: people are passionate, and they want it their way. You want your team to win no matter what, you want your driver to win no matter what.

      1. I think the main problem people have with the Malaysia incident was that Mark was told to keep his engine down and drive more slowly, and he was told that Seb would do the same. Of course, Sebastian didn’t and Mark was a sitting duck. It seemed less like simple disobedience and more like being stabbed in the back when you weren’t looking. If the order was simply to “save fuel and tyres, but you’re allowed to race” then there would be no problem. The fact that Red Bull tried to influence the result is wrong and I think that the drivers should have it out at all times. After all, they are the ones who drive the cars.

        1. @ladekoya Seb kept the engine up, Mark could’ve done the same. But he didn’t.

          What did Mark expect, really? considering his own actions at Silverstone 2011 and Brazil 2012… he saw the guy approaching, and tried to defend. But when he lost, he just kept it low and Seb vanished in the horizon. That was admiting defeat, admiting that no matter what he did, Seb would do better… and it probably had a lot to do with the fact that Mark had already decided to retire.

          Whatever the case, that day, he just wasn’t hungry enough.

          1. I agree that he was being hypocritical in this situation, especially after what he did in Brazil when he wasn’t fighting for the championship. However, I don’t think it was a matter of hunger. I think that he would have fought Seb if he had the fuel to do so, but he didn’t, and Seb did. This also explains why the team came under fire as it looked like they had given Seb the license to go faster while telling Mark that he couldn’t, especially when they didn’t tell Seb to give the place back.

            Honestly I think we can all agree that in any of these situations, team orders mess things up.

        2. Yeah, reminds me of Villeneuve Sr. vs Pironi

        3. It wasn’t fuel or tyres, it was the reliability problems of the KERS. Due to the amount of problems the RB suffered with their KERS packaging they had to err on the side of caution when the points seemed in the bag.

          How would have things looked if Seb’s KERS had caught fire a lap later, after disobeying orders to turn it down?

          I don’t blame Seb, he’s definitely a racer, although Mark also did the right thing, I believe. Ironic that Mark ended up with the lion’s share of KERS DNF’s that season.

      2. I don’t know why it would grating to witness inconsistency from the fans surrounding team orders. Isn’t it natural? All kinds of orders have all kinds of connotations depending on when they are given, to whom, at what point in the season, under what circumstances. Sometimes they’re quite understandable by most, while other times few agree.

        I suspect MW had more support for disobeying the team order because he was perceived as the underdog, in the same way sometimes on this site the dotw was not the pole and race winner but rather someone who did more with less equipment. And many did agree with SV disobeying the team in Malaysia 13 as it showed WDC level conviction, while I didn’t, as MW was a sitting duck, and SV didn’t own his decision immediately but rather looked sheepish after the race like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar, and the tension within the team could be cut with a knife.

    4. I think team orders have their place. If one driver is fighting of the championship with a rival team, then I think the team mate should be doing their best to assist in that if they are themselves not fighting. In the Rosberg/ Hamilton case, they are the only two drivers who are realistically going to win the championship, and to ask them to aid one another in a race is, in my mind absurd.

      I’m not a Hamilton fan, but I did not disregard him for refusing to aid Rosberg. Good call on that front I think.

      1. That sums it up nicely. Most of the (controversial) team order situations we’ve witnessed in recent years have been between drivers where only one of them had a statistical shot at the WDC, or one of them already had it pretty well sewn up. From here on out, Mercedes (with the WCC all but in their pocket) simply cannot ask either driver to do the other one any favors.

        1. If you’re not fighting for the championship and your teammate is, it’s obvious you are gonna be beaten by some margin, it’s not like holding up once or twice in 20 races will flip the score.

          The best you can do really is let the guy past, out of a sudden you are a team player, you might get a favor back in the future, who knows; otherwise, you are in the team’s (and the number one’s) way.

          Ideally team orders shouldnt be stupid, like Mercedes in Malasya 2013, where Rosberg actually had a shot at the Red Bulls.

    5. That Forbes article is very interesting. The notion of Disney owning Formula 1 does seem a bit daft at first, but it’s actually not that bad an idea. Disney’s interests go well beyond children’s films and theme parks, and they certainly know how to bring in an audience. They could possibly do a much better job at promoting the sport than the current owners, and that’s probably the biggest obstacle for bringing in new audiences rather than on-track action.

      Having said that, it’s hard to see how the financial imbalance of the sport could be solved by the very company who created Scrooge McDuck, who is pretty much a cartoon equivalent of Ecclestone himself.

      1. having Disney own F1 would be worse than Dorna owning MotoGP. Their news corp, ABC, is mindless and offensive propaganda, and their programming is less interesting than what Ferrari are doing with their cars. It’s better for F1 if it stays closer to the heart (UK) of where F1 is produced. F1 is already getting ridiculous, it can get much much worse though. The movie The Running Man seems to be the direction televised entertainment is going these days, which is why I don’t own a Television.

    6. Bernie- I pay all my taxes but it was worth $44million not to be investigated.
      Bernie- I didn’t pay a bribe but I will pay $100million not to be investigated.
      Bernie- See, I am totally innocent.

      Oh dear, still $100million seems a little more just, even if it is less than 2% of Bernies wealth and coincidentally is exactly the amount Bambino (the trust Bernie has no control over) pays him each year, could he possibly manage to live next year on the paltry $5million salary he gets and of course the dividend on his 5.3% of F1 shares?

      1. I think once again Bernie proves to the world that money beats all. Call it what you will but this settlement is nothing short of another bribe deal, except its open for everyone to see and the opposition wants it. Doesn’t matter what the name or meaning is, the sad truth is those who accept money to settle deals that involve matters of justice and/or law are just as corrupt those who pay them (unless there’s no other alternative). But then, where has true justice ever been in the court system? It’s all about who gets payed more and who can BS more. Welcome to reality.

    7. Regardless of what you think about Bernie and the allegations of bribery leveled against him. I think that Bernie might be in some very hot waters at the moment. He may be able to find a suitable settlement of £20 million, however, he’ll have to shell out for legal costs, and I’m guessing that will be on both sides, and I’m pretty sure that will be on top of that amount and won’t be cheap, because lets face it, Bernie has a expensive tastes in life, and I’m sure his legal team are the best that money can buy.
      Further to the bribery case, or should I say, linked to it, is the fact that Bernie maybe forced out of his ownership of F1, with increasing pressure from those around him. Will the settlement be enough to make this go away? Probably, if it was his only indiscretion, however, we all know that Bernie has been hot water in the past and perhaps the antics leading up to this, including the settlement may be enough to see a change in ownership in F1.
      On top of this, TV ratings are declining and this may be leveled at Bernie’s management of F1 and the constant rule changes.
      Given that he may lose his stake in F1, and £20 million plus legal costs, he stands to lose quite a lot of money in the next 2 years unless he can turn around the growing angst against him.

      1. @dragoll if you have $4Billion invested conservatively returning 5% pa that is $200million pa so anything less than $100million is a slap on the wrist for Bernie, as he himself said $44million (the alleged bribe) was cheap insurance to avoid the inconvenience of a tax audit even when he knew they would find nothing illegal.

    8. Guess that’ll mean the end of Ecclestone with CVC. They were already making noises about showing him the door pending the outcome of the trial and I’d have thought that settling out of court would be tantamount to an admission of guilt. His position in FOM can no longer be tenable if they’re to salvage any shred of credibility and avoid F1 disappearing completely down the toilet.

      1. @mazda-chris, No doubt Bernie will argue he is totally innocent and he only settled because the trial was a burdensome inconvenience, that may satisfy Bernies contractual agreement with CVC and prevent them from sacking him without a large payout ($100m.seems to be a frequently occuring figure in F1).

    9. Biskit Boy (@sean-p-newmanlive-co-uk)
      2nd August 2014, 2:37

      Nothing sticks on Teflon Bernie.

      How to wriggle out of a bribery case? Bribe your way out of course!

    10. As someone who lives in the U.S and has watched a lot of coverage from major sporting events, Disney buying F1 would be a great move. ESPN is the definitive channel for sports, smashing NBCSN out of the water, and they have a great way of providing coverage that will make Americans care about the sport. If they can get half the excitement they managed to bring during the world cup, then I’m sure viewing figures will far exceed the current ones in the U.S.

      There is still one key issue stopping F1 from becoming big in the U.S.A. The times of the races are ridiculous. Asian races aren’t worth it and European races are ok if you’re on central time but a real chore if you are further west. I know there isn’t really that much to be done, but F1 is always going to struggle in markets outside of Europe.

      1. @theo-hrp As somebody who lives in UTC+7 I can understand that last paragraph, though over here that applies to Indycar (midnight, just like watching Asian races in America, I reckon), as opposed to F1’s European rounds (7 PM).

      2. @theo-hrp I agree with you totally. I live in the UK but spent a summer a few years back in the States. Given that the races start at 8am ET or 5am PT, it’s unsurprising that the viewing figures are low and the same would be true for any sport with regular fixtures at that time. It took me to be in the States to realise first hand what the dedication North American fans must have to watch the entire season. It’s going to be almost impossible for a “casual sports fan” to stumble across most of the races, except those in your time zone.

      3. Asian series air at 6 a.m or 7 a.m here, and I prefer those early morning races but I know I’m part of a minority.

        I love NBA basketball and I don’t watch live games as much as I’d like too because on weekdays it starts at 1.00 a.m or later… so time zones is a challenge for any major sport.

      4. I live in Germany and in the Netherlands,and I like the early morning timeslot over eavening races, but tend to prefer both over the 2-4pm timeslot because they allow for doing other things with family and friends who don’t care for f1.

    11. I’m surprised the “magic paint” article from motorsport isnt featured, it’s almost as absurd as Ecclestone’s defense.

      1. magic paint is article from GMM, full of rubbish :)

    12. “If Disney were to take over F1 it would be no bad thing on a number of levels. It would bring marketing expertise and would give F1 a higher profile in the United States where the series has been trying to gain ground against local rival NASCAR.”

      With Disney owning both F1 and the Star Wars franchise, the future is bright for… wait for it…

      Podracing! The high-tech alternative to NASCAR

    13. i agree that kvyat has done very well this year but it’s a close call between him and magnussen for the rookie of the year. magnussen got a podium in his first f1 race, beat his world champion team mate a lot of times and had he not had a few incidents, in which some of them he was at fault, he’d have scored more points. kvyat did incredibly well, but also had some incidents, again, some of them his fault. beating team mate vergne isn’t as hard as beating button. it’s a very close call and i hope both of them end up fighting for championships.

      1. But Magnussen just came from FR3.5 and Kvyat mate a huge jump from Gp3.

        1. @austus what difference does that make? They’re both rookies at this level.

    14. Sad to see no mention of Carel Godin de Beaufort in the ‘on this day’ bit. The first Dutchman to score points had a massive shunt at Bergwerk the day before the 1964 GP and died one day later.

      1. I’ve never heard of Carel Godin de Beaufort before. So many bits and pieces you pickup on from @andae23 and @keithcollantine and others in the forums :)

    15. I’m so disappointed in the German judiciary. Why should Gribowsky get 8 years in prison and Bernie in effect nothing at all? Two halves of the same crime.

      I am so fed up of the endless dishonesty in F1. I was really hoping there was going to be a bit of justice this time.

    16. Disney looking to buy F1? Well, the some of the regs are becoming more like they are out of a cartoon and there are a fair few Mickey Mouse tracks nowadays, so they would fit right in!

    17. To have taken two podiums from two difficult weekends before the break has been really satisfying and, more than that, it allows me to smile and enjoy this time off knowing that i still have an opportunity to fight for this championship

      I wish Lewis showed that smile and joy a bit more on the podium…

      1. Don’t forget on the Hungary podium he was still in the situation that his team had asked him to get out of his teammate’s way, and stuck him on those hopeless primes for 30 laps.

        It was only later that the team agreed he was right to defend his position.

        1. Don’t forget those ‘hopeless primes’ got him to the podium, while they ‘stuck’ NR with an extra stop that saw him off the podium. Don’t forget that the team wasn’t exactly vehement about him not making it difficult for NR, but would have seen LH’s point as they saw that NR was not right on LH’s gearbox. It was hardly ‘only later’ that the team agreed he was right. And don’t forget LH spun at the beginning and was lucky the wing damage was less significant than the race before. He could have already been ahead of more cars when the safety car came out and luck of the draw favoured him and hurt NR.

          1. What has that got to do with his mood on the podium? Of course it was only after the podium that the team agreed he was right, as far as he knew.

            1. @lockup @robbie The thing that puts me off is the mood swings. At the podiums both in Germany and in Hungary, he was pretty down, looking like a spoilt kid, should be happy with a great result. And then some days later, either it’s an article or on twitter, he claims he’s all happy, blessed by God and the whole world is sunshine and rainbows.
              To me, that is fake happiness. He probably realizes he should be happy, so he then claims to be. Yea right..

            2. @me4me I just explained why he was downbeat on the Hungary podium. He’d cheered up by the bullpen already, having heard from the team presumably. In Germany he’d spent laps failing to get past Bottas and lost 10 points to his teammate – why should he see that as a great result before reflection? Fake would be pretending he was pleased.

            3. @lockup Just saying he should have been pleased with his day, except for his spin, as he came out ahead of NR, so he had reasons to be happy. Ie. the primes weren’t hopeless. Also, by the end of the race it’s not like they were still asking LH to let NR go in spite of NR’s pace…different scenarios. I’m sure he knew well before then everything was fine. I really doubt there was much tension if any that had to be cleared up after the podium. LH knew all along he was complying with the order except NR didn’t make it so LH would not lose any time. LH didn’t need until after the podium to know where he stood with the team. There are likely radio comms we haven’t heard and conversations they had well before we were reading quotes in articles put together by third parties.

            4. @robbie Well something changed between the podium and the bullpen, when he was indeed pleased with his day as you wished.

              I can’t buy into your speculation about the radio either I gotta say: the team wouldn’t say what needed saying on open radio for the world to hear; FOM for sure WOULD have broadcast it; and Lewis was embroiled in racing and way too busy for non-urgent stuff like that. It was the same in Turkey 2010.

              It’s a bit of a crazy viewpoint afaic – Lewis is supposed to behave a certain PC way so that he doesn’t look fake? Cmon :)

    18. And why does Hamilton wanna gain extra weight? I thought lighter meant faster? (I know of di resta’s underweight qualifying DQ though

      1. @wil-liam if it means that he ends up being physically fitter then I don’t see why he shouldn’t. If the cars are getting lighter, they will have to run some sort of ballast anyway to get to 691kg, and remember that figure rises next year iirc.

    19. So Bernie pays to get off out of a court case that will put him in jail? Isn’t that just a bribe? Unless there is something different in the German judiciary system that we don’t know about then this just seems really odd that you could just pay to get out of the problems?

      1. @ryandixon, c’mon Ryan haven’t you ever paid a fine rather than go to jail.

        1. @HoHum, It just seems a little odd that midway through the trail he pays a lump sum. Although admittedly, I didn’t see it as a fine due to being blinkered with the first assumption. A fine that small for a bribe for a deal that large must of been a calculated risk.

          1. @hohum

            Yeah of course he’s paid a fine but Grubowski paid for his and Eccelstones crimes with gaol time and Eccelstoned pays with company money and walks,

            Also, ! Ryans initial misdemeanor didnt devalue a company for personnel gain or pay a bribe to put off a whiny sniffling little (cussword) from dobbing him into the tax office,

            Cheers, :) let me pour you a vino

    20. Before every F1 race, Dallas-based telecom giant AT&T Inc. installs a custom-built fiber-optic network for Infiniti Red Bull Racing’s 60-strong track-side team. At the U.S. Grand Prix’s Circuit of The Americas in 2013, for example, it brought 120 miles of cabling.

      That’s really impressive … and that’s probably very expensive!

    21. So…guilty or not guilty, Bernie cuts a check for what amounts to pocket lint for him and he skates free. If he gives the money to charity, he’ll deduct that on his taxes, so in the end it’s not even a mosquito bite to him.

      Most sites quote Bernie’s net worth at $4.2B USD. A $30M USD fine is equal to .004% of his net worth. Or- put another way, if a guy earns $50,000 a year, it’s like paying a $2.00 USD fine. Bernie probably spent 1/10th of his fine equivalent on attorney fees, but that’s the equivalent to the average guy of about 20 US cents.

      I honestly don’t know if he’s guilty or not, but he bought his way out of the situation for chump change. Different set of rules for the super rich. Not saying that’s bad or good, just offering a relative view on what it would mean to the average Joe.

      1. Totally agree. I’ll see it as dishonest on the part of the German authorities if they go through with this complete letoff after locking up the other guy for 8 years.

        1. @lockup, (? 1 time post?) My question is does the other guy get to keep his $44m. that works out at $5.5m per year, I might consider doing a couple of years for that kind of payday.

          1. @hohum


            Lmao, i reckon I’d rather be poor than be in gaol as a rich banker type :)

    22. Any news on Martin Whitmarsh

      Is it true, that he was paid 10 million quids to disappear from the face of F1 (Source)

    23. Report from France24 says Bernie has upped his offer to $100 million.

    24. I really had a bit of a laugh about Horner lecturing Mercedes on letting their guys fight it out on track. Its not as if his team has tried to manage who finishes where in just about every situation they found themselves with cars meeting on track. And that often included their baby team.

    25. Its good to see Checo taking the mickey ,

      good for him, musta been a kick in the teeth getting marched from Mclarence, I dont think he did much wrong, he was given a dog to ride and asked to gallop,

    Comments are closed.