Next up in round two of Champion of Champions are two drivers who had long and successful careers with McLaren.
Alain Prost won three titles with them in a six-year stint with the team. Mika Hakkinen won the championship twice in an even longer time with the team, lasting from 1993 to 2001.
Prost had the benefit of driving a series of highly competitive McLarens. Only the 1987 car was unable to challenge for the championship.
But he faced tough team mates in the shape of Niki Lauda and Ayrton Senna – both of which became three-times champions.
With no disrespect to Hakkinen’s long-term team mate David Coulthard, he wasn’t in the class of Lauda and Senna. But it took until 1998 for Hakkinen to get his hands on a championship-contending car.
He delivered a pair of titles, but Michael Schumacher wrested the crown from him in 2000.
Hakkinen left F1 one year later. What was originally supposed to be a sabbatical from the 2002 season turned out to be permanent retirement.
Prost has also gone on sabbatical ten years earlier – but the difference was, he came back. He arrived at Williams, won the 1993 championship in the devastatingly quick FW15C, then retired.
Prost was a four-time runner-up as well as a four-time champion. He finished second in 1983 (to Nelson Piquet), 1984 (to Lauda), 1988 and 1990 (to Senna).
Which of these drivers should go through to the next round of the Champion of Champions? Vote for which you think was best below and explain who you voted for and why in the comments.
Don’t miss F1 Fanatic’s interview with Mika Hakkinen tomorrow. Leave a comment on the round-up if you’ve got a question for him.
|Alain Prost||Mika Hakkinen|
|Titles||1985, 1986, 1989, 1993||1998, 1999|
|Second in title year/s||Michele Alboreto, Nigel Mansell, Ayrton Senna, Ayrton Senna||Michael Schumacher, Eddie Irvine|
|Teams||McLaren, Renault, Ferrari, Williams||Lotus, McLaren|
|Notable team mates||Niki Lauda, Ayrton Senna, Nigel Mansell||Johnny Herbert, Martin Brundle, David Coulthard|
|Wins||51 (25.63%)||20 (12.42%)|
|Poles||33 (16.58%)||26 (16.15%)|
|Modern points per start1||12.48||8.58|
|% car failures2||16.58||24.22|
|Modern points per finish3||14.96||11.33|
|Notes||Lost ’83 title by two points and ’84 title by half a point||Stunned Ayrton Senna by out-qualifying him in their first race as team mates|
|Controversial clash with Senna sealed third title||Recovered from head injuries after crashing at Adelaide in 1995|
|Returned from sabbatical to clinch fourth title with Williams||Won back-to-back titles for McLaren in 1998 and 1999|
|Bio||Alain Prost||Mika Hakkinen|
1 How many points they scored in their career, adjusted to the 2010 points system, divided by the number of races they started
2 The percentage of races in which they were not classified due to a mechanical failure
3 How many points they scored in their career, adjusted to the 2010 points system, divided by the number of starts in which they did not suffer a race-ending mechanical failure
Which was the better world champion driver?
- Mika Hakkinen (21%)
- Alain Prost (79%)
Total Voters: 639
Read the F1 Fanatic Champion of Champions introduction for more information and remember to check back tomorrow for the next round.
Have you voted in the previous rounds of Champion of Champions yet? Find them all here:
Champion of Champions
- Ayrton Senna voted Champion of Champions by F1 Fanatic readers
- Champion of Champions in stats
- Champion of Champions Final: Senna vs Schumacher
- Ayrton Senna vs Juan Manuel Fangio
- Michael Schumacher vs Alain Prost
- Ayrton Senna vs Jack Brabham
- Juan Manuel Fangio vs Jackie Stewart
- Alain Prost vs Niki Lauda
- Jim Clark vs Michael Schumacher
- Jack Brabham vs Lewis Hamilton
Images ?é?® Williams/Sutton (Prost), Bridgestone Corporation (Hakkinen)